Ticketek must love this time of year

Remove this Banner Ad

Hawthorn and Swans fans have no doubt received an email from their respective clubs informing them to enter the ballot for Grand Final tickets, should their sides be successful in the prelim( I know I have).

The problem is, you have to enter this ballot before you know if you're side is going to play off in the big dance(tomorrow), and you'll be handing over $5.50 for each barcode you enter to the lovely people at Ticketek. Non refundable of course.

I'd be interested to know if Freo, Geelong, North and Port supporters have also been advised to enter the ballot? I assume so.

Even if we think about it very conservatively and presume that only half of these membership bases enter the ballot, Ticketek are looking at an influx of around $805,000.
Now, although I'm not great with maths we're talking about somewhere between 60-80% of those transactions being handed over for literally no service whatsoever(as only 2 teams will make it, in case I lost you somewhere).

If every member of every club contacted enters the ballot, Ticketek would stand to pocket $1.6million, without even printing out or selling a ticket.

It's a rort.
 
I'd be interested to know if Freo, Geelong, North and Port supporters have also been advised to enter the ballot? I assume so.

Correct - members of the four clubs involved in the semi finals this week have been told that if their team makes the prelim, they will need to register for the ballot ($5.50 per membership as you said) next week.

You think that's bad - last year I paid $180 to upgrade my membership late in the season to guarantee myself a GF ticket if we made it... I was cursing my very generous donation the day we lost the QF.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You only enter if your team is through to the prelim but your point is absolutely correct.

I had a mass panic this morning when I put my barcodes in (I have guaranteed tickets), hit next and my internet (or the site) bugged out. I reconnected and it was telling me that my barcodes had already been used. I then spent 40 minutes holding on the phone (having had to dial about 30 times before even getting into the queue) before they were able to sort it out. Not good for the heart.
 
It's a rort and it's been a rort for a few years already. For example, for Swans members we could submit an entry as a group with a maximum of 8 eligible member barcodes per group. But they're charging a $5.00 fee per barcode rather than per group entry. Seriously? All that changed for each additional barcode was to enter the number in a new line in the text box. And I had to do it myself on my browser! That's $5.00! You're bloody kidding me!
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #6
Correct - members of the four clubs involved in the semi finals this week have been told that if their team makes the prelim, they will need to register for the ballot ($5.50 per membership as you said) next week.

You think that's bad - last year I paid $180 to upgrade my membership late in the season to guarantee myself a GF ticket if we made it... I was cursing my very generous donation the day we lost the QF.
Ahh of course, that makes more sense.

Ticketek pocketed upwards of $200,000 from Hawk supporters alone in 2011 when we fell over against the Pies.
 
Yeah does seem a bit steep.
Could understand if it was $2. It does cost money to set it all up, run it, deal with problems etc. and they don't add any service/handling charges on top like the rest of the finals. I think some of it would also go towards paying for those letters we got posted, they probably cost $1 a pop all up.
 
I'd be ok with it if they used that $1.6m to develop an online system where you can choose where you sit before it randomly issues a ticket and then you have to go through the slow and poorly designed seating thing if you want to change your ticket all while trying to avoid the crash.

I'd also be ok with it if they used the money to design it so that all the stadium's tickets were released at the same time. Not sections here and sections there. :drunk:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Go down to the TAB and put a wager on your opponent if you aren't confident in your team winning.
 
Yep. Sucks especially for lower priority hawks who won't get a ticket even if we win the prelim
For the Swans ballot today, after processing the priority 1 and 2 memberships they were able to calculate whether there would be any tickets left over for priority 3 members. Turns out there were was some standing room left so they went ahead with the priority 3 registrations. If there were none left they weren't going to bother with the priority 3 registrations and save people the $5.50 when they had no chance of a ticket. I wonder if the other clubs will be doing this? Last year no priority 3 Hawk members got tickets so this approach would save them all $5.50
 
Been going on since at least 2008.

How the toothless tiger that is the ACCC hasn't done something about it, I'm not sure.

Having said that - the ACCC was until recently run by one Graeme Samuel. The same Graeme Samuel that at one time ran the AFL.

I'm sure you see where this is heading.
 
For the Swans ballot today, after processing the priority 1 and 2 memberships they were able to calculate whether there would be any tickets left over for priority 3 members. Turns out there were was some standing room left so they went ahead with the priority 3 registrations. If there were none left they weren't going to bother with the priority 3 registrations and save people the $5.50 when they had no chance of a ticket. I wonder if the other clubs will be doing this? Last year no priority 3 Hawk members got tickets so this approach would save them all $5.50
For some unexplained reason the poor Cat 3's are charged $7.50 instead of $5 too.
 
For starters, they do provide a service. If the clubs did this themselves they would struggle with processing it all. $5 worth of work is steep i guess.
I'd be ok with it if they used that $1.6m to develop an online system where you can choose where you sit before it randomly issues a ticket and then you have to go through the slow and poorly designed seating thing if you want to change your ticket all while trying to avoid the crash.

I'd also be ok with it if they used the money to design it so that all the stadium's tickets were released at the same time. Not sections here and sections there. :drunk:
They occasionally have that service during the year at the MCG. It wouldn't work for a final as too many people want seats at the same time.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #25
Just think, they are pocketing all this, without even selling a single ticket.

Would love to know what cut of each ticket they get on top of that.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Ticketek must love this time of year

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top