Team DJ
Norm Smith Medallist
Maybe they are offering 17 or 18 to Sydney for Parker? Would they have a need for him? Then 17/18 and 23 for KT. Would that be acceptable?
17 and 18.
Sign me up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Maybe they are offering 17 or 18 to Sydney for Parker? Would they have a need for him? Then 17/18 and 23 for KT. Would that be acceptable?
michelangelo rucci @michelangeloruc
Has Brisbane put a spanner in the Kurt Tippett dealings?#afltrades
Expand
michelangelo rucci @michelangeloruc
Has Brisbane put a spanner in the Kurt Tippett dealings?#afltrades
Expand
michelangelo rucci @michelangeloruc
Has Brisbane put a spanner in the Kurt Tippett dealings?#afltrades
Expand
Rumour or fact.I imagine, given Adelaide's level of cap room following $kirts departure, we'd be more than willing to assist Brisbane in increasing their offer in the first year and absorbing some cap space in year 1, while they sort things out.
Keep in mind Brisbane are aware of Polec's desire to consider moving home next year and may not want to find themselves in the position we're in at the moment.
Vossy being proactive?
I didn't know tippet batted on the other sideYou do realise the bloke on our team that often contributes to the B column, rather than the G column will be playing for you next year right?
Back to the old Polec + 8 for Tippett + 20 chestnut?I have heard Adelaide are desperate to get him to Brisbane, will be interested in what Rucci is on about.
We wont know until the week is over but........Sydney have presented themselves as tough, protective and uncompromising. The very qualities that underpin 'culture'. Quite praiseworthy when considering they are the club seeking to recruit (read swindle) for the said Mr Tippett. Even if it all changes on Friday, the original statements by Ireland 2 weeks or so ago, casting in stone that no premiership player or even any father/son Sprigger will ever be traded by the all pervading 'blood' culture, will be left resonating as the remembered voicings and stance of the Swans. Quite clever. Do words speak louder than actions??? Unfortunately for the Crows we have been on the back foot from the first day and the weakness of our position is palpable. We have let the trade value of Tippett dissolve away to the point that in 2012 we have one of the highest paid footballers who, together with the club of his choice are now 'calling the tune'. AFC are the current 'owners' of the assett named Tippett and yet we are now placed in a scenario where we are far from the 'position of power'. I'm sure there are better analogies but it is kinda like having your car repossessed and it hurts.
I don't like it but grudgingly I have to say that (I know the week is yet to pan out and strange things could still happen) Sydney have so far strengthened the perception of their 'culture'. What can AFC do? Have we miscalculated in our previous years of sucking to the retention of Tippett? What can we do from all of this to promote any positives re the AFC 'culture'? Do we cry foul and paint Tippett, Barouche(?) et al as the villians? Or, after the dust has settled do we use the defecation (sorry defection) as a key to more hard nosed list management processes and the key to a strong ruthless on field performance - particularly against the Swans!
Anyway it is still in the mixing pot and I have faith in Noble....the Tippett inheritance is not of his doing.
However it comes out I want the AFC to come forth with strong enduring publicity statements that help to picture the Club as strong, purposeful, united and uncompromising and if need be, PIXXED OFF, rather than a closed ranks, lets keep it in house approach.
lazy journalismTrue enough.
I was listening to Trade Radio yesterday, and the hosts seemed to be in agreement that if Tippett went to the draft (either one) that he would make it to Sydney. They did not even debate it like it was an issue, more like it was an inevitability. They didn't elaborate on that certainty, which disappointed me. I'd like to know why they're so certain no other club would take a punt on Tippett if he was in the draft.
Back to the old Polec + 8 for Tippett + 20 chestnut?
With Polec coming in, we would only need one pick in the draft...pick 8
Make it happen Noble
Yeah not sure its that. I think Bris were definately in the right ball park when initial discussions began about 3 weeks ago.Back to the old Polec + 8 for Tippett + 20 chestnut?
With Polec coming in, we would only need one pick in the draft...pick 8
Make it happen Noble
What ballpark was that?Yeah not sure its that. I think Bris were definately in the right ball park when initial discussions began about 3 weeks ago.
What ballpark was that?
Would rather delist Tambling or relegate him to the rookie list and have an extra pick. Would hate to think that there is an 18 year old out there with a Football future that misses a spot on our list just so we can delist Tambling next year.
Aside from that though.
Polec and 8 for Tippett and 20. YES!!!!!
Real or fake account?
Fake account
Pretty sure this is the real oneFake account