If that's the case can you work on upsizing your avatar? It's awfully distracting and making me squit.I...I just don't know what to say.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
If that's the case can you work on upsizing your avatar? It's awfully distracting and making me squit.I...I just don't know what to say.
No this is the topic now.
I'd like to cast Cloud Kill on Kurt Tippett.
IWD2 implented the 3e ruleset first from memory - was fun for sure - the story of BG2/SOA and ToB were amazing though.I was a bigger fan of IWD2 but BG2 was brilliant. Great memories
Horrid Wilting was more my style
But back on topic, this looks worse every day. $200k outside the cap? That's a disgrace.
I hope the AFL are going to be willing to accept Trigg's immediate firing as suitable punishment, since he was apparently the only person at the Crows who was aware of this absurd deal. Oh, and a big fine, of course, but that's a given.
Don't say anything...just get ready to bend overI...I just don't know what to say.
Also, besides Trigg, the club deserves our full support during this saga. It is very clear that Trigg is the only one to blame for all of this.... and Reid, but he aint at the club anymore anyway.
Planescape: Torment > BG and BG2
IWD2 implented the 3e ruleset first from memory - was fun for sure - the story of BG2/SOA and ToB were amazing though.
Unless we get banned from participating in it which would not surprise given the allegationsAt least if we lose draft picks, having a spare $800K in TPP ......we at least have Free Agency we can rely on
So won't be as disadvantaged as may have been previously
There are a lot of questions to be asked here. Did Trigg and Reid hav the authority to make these offers or enter these agreements with Tippett. How does the delegation of authority structure work at the crows. Would a deal like this require board approval? If yes, and board approval was not sought, then Trigg and Reid have bigger issues to worry about. Each year they would have to sign auditors reports saying they've disclosed everything to their knowledge. There are potentially criminal offenses associated with all of this.It's sad that a club gets severely punished for the actions of one or two very stupid people. It doesn't seem fair to the players, coaching staff and other administrative people who have done nothing wrong. The fans have done nothing wrong either, and now we have to watch the AFL destroy us. But I guess that highlights the importance of making sure you appoint the right people to the positions where these mistakes can be made. Sad thing is I don't think Reid or Trigg have ever placed a foot wrong in their administrative careers before or after this stupid 2009 agreement. But no matter what else they have achieved or will achieve in their careers, they will always be remembered for this. (Sigh.......)
Man, that is a cynical way of looking at things. If the AFL computer forensics team can't find a single thing wrong with all our other contracts, then all you are doing is speculating on nothing but opinion Carl. Why on earth would we invite the AFL to do this if we are doing this with other players? Trying to cover it up wouldn't work with technology the way it is these days.That's what I'm saying.
He was telling the truth. I've said all along that our denials about the clause were denials, but they were always very carefully worded. And never categorical.
I don't want to sound like a 'woe is us' supporter and I'm still microwaving my membership and taking a dump on the front step of the Westpac Centre and everything... but is every club doing stuff like this every day? The whole third party payments stuff and backroom 'off the record' deals.
The old school methods - the brown paper bags... the club credit card that got borrowed... buying a player's house and selling it back to them for less... have these little tactics just been replaxed by more elaborate and harder to trace methods? Is it like drugs in cycling where just everyone does it?
Is what has been uncovered at the AFC just the tip of the iceberg both at our club, and throughout the wider competition?
Our mistake was not making a stupid illegal contract/payment, but getting caught doing it.
"The AFL will find nothing" because we've since updated and refined our methods - not because we're clean. As long as dunces like Dangerfield don't tweet pictures of their brand new car we should be all sweet.
What have you done with AFGM?
Pretty sure I posted my disgust at Trigg as well, keep reading. Tbh though, as I said in another thread, my life isn't gonna end if he stays on as CEO, it really doesn't faze me. I have no idea what his job involves or how well he does it (besides this saga IF true), and I don't really have the education in the business area to criticise him. I'm an engineer, I hate this shit!What about Triggy mate? Lost any respect for him yet?
10 am yesterday wrote this...seems an eternity...This would be my option 1 to deal with Trigg. Then he can resign from the ambulance.I wouldn't blame him if he went into Triggy's office and punched him in the head.
FA is outside the draft ?Unless we get banned from participating in it which would not surprise given the allegations
Can't believe AFC condoned payments outside of TPP .....it's totally not the AFC "good guy" style
The question is:
1. How were 3rd party deals administered ....part of Tippetts marketing allowance
Would have all been just been sponsorship deals for Tippett, Surely you remember the bloody Tippetts Tips ads. He was flogging everything hardly saw another Crow untill Dangerfield got big.
club would have to make a contract offer to the player at some point, the AFL could prevent us from doing this. i dont think they will but i dont see it as outside the realms of possibility.FA is outside the draft ?
What ...are they going to ban all FA arrangements ?? ....hard to see that
If a player can choose a club of choice and they choose Adelaide, doesn't any ban work against the player and FA?