Live Event Toby Greene fronts the tribunal - Suspension appeal

[Orange Agent]

So it's gone to the tribunal.

Has the MRO blown it "out of proportion" too?

Every charge of serious misconduct has to go directly to the tribunal. Its a charge not gradeable under the MRO system. You people are blowing it up when the reality is its the system that is forcing that outcome.

 

[Igloo]

For what, giving away a free kick? You are actually a bot.

There were 176 frees paid this week. Tribunal is gonna be ****ing busy.

 

[Shadow89]

I hope Toby Greene gets a week and the Lions beat the Giants by a point next week.

He's the only player I know that is solely responsible for the AFL to create a new rule to keep players safe

Gary Rohan says hi

 

[_M_16_]

I loved how GWS fans were crying for Bont's blood, and acting like Bont's bump which was nothing more than a reckless, late bump/smother attempt, was a deliberate sniper attack. Then spent all the time leading up to the final encouraging their own players to deliberately cheap shot and target Bontempelli.

And since the game, some were applauding Greene's act and defending him.

Seems the culture of GWS's serial thugs flows through to the fans as well. Think a reckless late bump is dirty, but cheap, dirty, deliberate tactics isn't?


How many more times does Greene need to be suspended to learn? Could he be the first AFL player to cross the total weeks suspended threshold? If he wasn't a budding AFL player and just a regular joe, he probably would have got locked up for his previous discretions off field. That, kicking people in the face, punches off the ball, eye gouging. Guy has needs anger control management. If I had a daughter I wouldn't let her within 1000 miles of this bloke, snaps to easily and doesn't even think. Its a shame cause he is talented as they come at his best. But his career will be remembered for the wrong reasons. Don't know why Giant's fans defend him so easily. I'd be dirty on him if he played for my club. Guy needs therapy sessions not just a suspension.

 

[MightyHawks]

I hope Bont gives the evidence that sinks Greene. Actions like Greene’s don’t deserve the protection of the player code.

Well if Bont doesn't give evidence that sinks Greene then I guess Greene will get let off and Bont will get a big fine

 

[TwiggleyFanClub]

This isn’t the 70s or 80s.
This sort of stuff isn’t acceptable any more.
Even that studs up incident was just wrong. Protect his space BS: you make contact to the body to protect space, not the guy’s face.

Yeah, you need someone to rough the other guy up a little bit and get under their skin.
But Greene seems to enjoy it a little too much...

 

[TwiggleyFanClub]

That said, its the finals and he brings in crowds.
Short of pulling out Bont’s eyeball, running up to the channel 7 camera and eating the thing on live tv, he’ll get a slap on the wrist.

 

[Substance]

I hope Bont gives the evidence that sinks Greene. Actions like Greene’s don’t deserve the protection of the player code.

Yep. If it's not a footballing act, it's not within the players code.

 

[Tex9798]

Anyway, he's been charged with the "totality" of misdemeanours, not just one thing.

So he has, missed that in the initial article.

To me this says the AFL are going after him for unnecessary contact to the face as eye gouging is specifically listed as direct to the tribunal in the 2019 guidelines.

I'm guessing hair pulling (misconduct), contact to the face (1 game) and they are probably throwing rough conduct in their too and just rolling it up into serious misconduct.

Honestly not sure why, feel they could classify each incident and end up at the same result the tribunal does.

 

[chunkylover53]

Anyone defending Toby needs to watch from the angle in this video, and tell me he's not a genuine piece of scum. Same guy who had criminal charges for assault with a dangerous weapon and assault causing serious injury

I agree mate it was a dog act and should get plenty of time off. Just having a laugh re: Judd.

 

[Hawk_francais]

Moron. 4 weeks

 

[Adz]

The response from the Bulldogs and Bont was pretty pathetic.

 

[FastLane]

seriously nothing in it- roughs him up a bit- looks more like he's rubbing his forearm across Bonts shnoz and a little bit of a rubbing on the hair.
Dogs fans are as emotional as Bevo

 

[FastLane]

Serious question, how is this not a dangerous tackle?

Because it's not mummy and is Bont. Umpires were a disgrace all day (all weekend in fact).

 

[JoeHawk]

Toby being Toby. Will the AFL decide to look away....sorry, silly question

There is nothing clear in that footage. Doesn’t look nice but anything from that is just speculation.

 

[JoeHawk]

The eye gouge is the act of applying pressure on the eyes is it not?

He has a bruise below his eye. How do they prove that’s from Greene anyway?

The tribunal would want to have better footage than what we saw on 7 to prove he eye gouged.

Players often have black eyes from other battle incidents. Any proof this was by Green?

 

[Sentinel]

There's apparently more clear cut footage which hasn't yet been released to the public, in addition to what they put out last night. I'd assume it's fairly damning if that's what Christian based his decision on.

Don't know why they wouldn't just show it though.

 

[Virgin Dog]

Serious question, how is this not a dangerous tackle?

It was paid as a free kick for dangerous tackle in game, what do you mean?

 

[Virgin Dog]

The response from the Bulldogs and Bont was pretty pathetic.

Frankly, I think it's just odd that this game was even happening in the first place. It's odd they'd let a bottom 6 side into the finals, don't you think Adz?

 

[Bay Giant]

If Toby did actually eye gouge him than it is safe to say that “The Bont” should change his name to “The Cat”

If anyone went near my eyes in a gouging motion I’d have chased them down and absolutely started laying in to them.

Weak as piss Bont for getting up like nothing happened.

 

[Dogs_R_Us]

Toby Greene is not Chris Judd you wally, and if you keep resorting to posting the same crap over and over, you clearly have lost the argument.

There simply is not available evidence that has been presented so far publicly that should result in a suspension for Greene.

You have yet to proven conclusively that what Greene did constitutes 'serious/gross misconduct'.

You would be a worse lawyer than Lionel Hutz.

We don’t have to prove anything. The tribunal will do that

 

[PetterdHoisted]

Really dangerous act by Bont with that sling tackle, hair pulling about the only conclusive thing from the footage re. Greene.

 

[Sentinel]

If Toby did actually eye gouge him than it is safe to say that “The Bont” should change his name to “The Cat”

If anyone went near my eyes in a gouging motion I’d have chased them down and absolutely started laying in to them.

Weak as piss Bont for getting up like nothing happened.

Yes in this situation Bontempelli is the one who is 'weak as piss' not the bloke who has jumped on top of him whilst he's defenceless on the ground, gone at his face and grabbed 2 fistfuls of his hair.

 

[Dogs_R_Us]

Is everyone ignoring the fact Bonts arms and hands were free the whole time Greene was roughing him up yet at no time did he try and grab Greene’s hands and stop him. Rather he’s just holding them out to the umpire, as if to say Ump look what happening, where is my free kick.

That says to me there was no gouging and at no stage did Bont feel seriously threatened he was in danger of injury. Reckon it’s a lot more of forceful pushing and rubbing down on the head than anything overly sinister. The hair pull at the end was probably the worst bit.

Might get one week for the totality of the incident but that would be it for me

Lol victim blaming now

 

[Bay Giant]

Lol victim blaming now

You’re missing the point.

There is no victim because there is no crime