- Oct 20, 2015
- 2,125
- 2,032
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
The point is I wouldn’t have a clue like everyone one else on here wouldn’t have a clue who approached who! Including you!And?
WCE didn't approach them, which is the point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The point is I wouldn’t have a clue like everyone one else on here wouldn’t have a clue who approached who! Including you!And?
WCE didn't approach them, which is the point.
All the talk was about Barrass to Bulldogs, then when he was known to be gettable, Hawthorn suddenly entered the fray.The point is I wouldn’t have a clue like everyone one else on here wouldn’t have a clue who approached who! Including you!
Then 3 West Coast supporters posted straight after that he isn't....Every fan base has them.I thought I read it all on Bigfooty but then comes along a West Coast supporter saying Barrass is a better footballer then Lake WOW.
So in other words you have no clue! GotchyaAll the talk was about Barrass to Bulldogs, then when he was known to be gettable, Hawthorn suddenly entered the fray.
Pretty sure Mitchell's known for chasing players he targets personally, so I highly doubt he was sitting around hoping for Nick Gieschen to approach him when he already knows Barrass having previously played him and coached his team.
Cool.So in other words you have no clue! Gotchya
I agree, you’ll get out 1st and maybe a token F3 or 4Cool.
Makes zero difference to the amount Hawks will cough up for him though.
It'll be your 2nd. You'll probably get our f3rd or this year's 4th coming back.I agree, you’ll get out 1st and maybe a token F3 or 4
I honestly think both club supporters will end up a little unhappy with the trade.I agree, you’ll get out 1st and maybe a token F3 or 4
Well obviously i know that. He didnt get AAs at 32.Lakes All Australians came at the Bulldogs. Your argument keeps getting sillier. Hahaha
I thought he’s worth our 1st but if you guys are keen on a 2nd so be itIt'll be your 2nd. You'll probably get our f3rd or this year's 4th coming back.
If it’s pick 10, I highly doubt there’ll be anything else involvedI honestly think both club supporters will end up a little unhappy with the trade.
Something like;
Hawks out - *10, *27
In - Barrass, *59
And some shuffling of late future picks.
To hazzard a guess
Well obviously i know that. He didnt get AAs at 32.
Barass would have 2 AAs if not for McGovern. Not even 1 single doubt about it. Not many players at FB/CHB get AA playing second fiddle to someone else. Its just how the selection process works
As number 1 in Hawks he will rack up AA selections. Ill come back in 13 months time to claim my receipt when he does. You are 100% welcome to do the same
I suspect it'll end up a tad higher than that. You guys are playing some good football. Fun to watch too.If it’s pick 10, I highly doubt there’ll be anything else involved
This works out to be pick #5 equivalent. I know precedent doesn’t account for much but what has been higher than that recently? Cameron was pick #1, Taranto pick #4I honestly think both club supporters will end up a little unhappy with the trade.
Something like;
Hawks out - *10, *27
In - Barrass, *59
And some shuffling of late future picks.
To hazzard a guess
If pick 10, most would probably agree. If you go deep in finals, that's where the later picks come in.If it’s pick 10, I highly doubt there’ll be anything else involved
Fair enough, lake probably would have received more AA selections if dogs had won more preliminary finals during his tenure. So the final tally of all Australian selections + imaginary all Australian selections sits at 4:2 in favour of lake leaving him still as the better/more talented playerWell obviously i know that. He didnt get AAs at 32.
Barass would have 2 AAs if not for McGovern. Not even 1 single doubt about it. Not many players at FB/CHB get AA playing second fiddle to someone else. Its just how the selection process works
As number 1 in Hawks he will rack up AA selections. Ill come back in 13 months time to claim my receipt when he does. You are 100% welcome to do the same
I would have thought TT would be a pretty good comparison value wise. Talented* KPP hold more value than their mid counterparts.This works out to be pick #5 equivalent. I know precedent doesn’t account for much but what has been higher than that recently? Cameron was pick #1, Taranto pick #4
I honestly think both club supporters will end up a little unhappy with the trade.
Something like;
Hawks out - *10, *27
In - Barrass, *59
And some shuffling of late future picks.
To hazzard a guess
The disrespect to Gov and Scarlett putting those other blokes in that listStop smoking crack barrass is a very good full back but Lake sits alongside Gov, Rance, McPharlin, Scarlett tier of KPD of the last 20 years absurd claim
Would you trade pick 5 for 10 and 27?This works out to be pick #5 equivalent. I know precedent doesn’t account for much but what has been higher than that recently? Cameron was pick #1, Taranto pick #4
Rance and McPharlin were both elite defenders.The disrespect to Gov and Scarlett putting those other blokes in that list
Im aware, but Gov and Scarlett are the next tier above.Rance and McPharlin were both elite defenders.
Franklin rated McPharlin his toughest opponent and Rance was a 5 time all Australian and 3 time Tigers B+F.