AFLW 2024 - Round 2 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Both list managers wouldn’t be doing their job if they weren’t trying to make it happen for minimum/maximum value. It will just come down to whether there’s a sliver of common ground between the two.
This is a fun read. Eagles fans talking down draft picks for a known commodity and vice versa for Hawks fans. I wonder why
No idea what TiAn_ wrote, one of the very few posters I have on ignore due to the constant spilling of garbage. You don’t need to “pass on” information from a readily available months old interview. No one has problems with opinions (trade value etc) but when you make statements on medical issues with to no knowledge of what you’re even talking about you’re going to get called out. Pretty ignorant if you think my conviction on this topic is coming through WCE medical statements.TiAn_ appreciate this. Clearly as a Freo supporter on here I should stay in my lane and not pass on what said player has mentioned away from a media presser or intervieweaglevision knows his flock well through WCE medical statements and his word alone should be enough to sway others on this forum.
It's not my opinion, but from Barrass himself. If it was an article or interview I would then post in here and make a judgement on that. I hope that clears it up.
“back is cooked” is an opinion.
Happy to give him a 1 year deal to see if a new environment and learning off McGovern helps him, but he's really shown nothing to suggest he can be a good AFL player
People have been trying to palm DGB off to us on this forum for years already. He is a roll of the dice DFA at best. Unfortunately you wasted a high pick on him, like we did with Brander for example.
137 games in 8 seasons is a more honest representation. Add 4 games for the covid year which he played the entirety of and its 17.6 games per year. Not that bad
Yeah, that's all really fair. I still think given his age and back issues clubs would want to be doing their due dilligence. He's a gun player no doubt, but given his likely cost, and well as his age, you'd want to make sure he's healthy and confident you're in the premiership window for the next 3-4 years.
Yep,
We don't need to do either
No Barrass doesn’t. As I’ve said earlier Barrass will make very little difference to us competing for a flag next year.
Almost that entire draft bombed out, most Hawk fans are pretty fine with how it ended up. They can’t all be winners.Is it really fun for you being reminded about a pick 6 selection a couple of years totally bombing out? If that had worked out then the Hawks wouldn't need Tom Barrass.
It's more factual than 90% of the other views being floated.
Maybe if they chuck in Harley we might be kind enough to add the 2nd one
