![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/hawthorn.png)
HeHateMe
Norm Smith Medallist
- Nov 28, 2009
- 7,944
- 6,607
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
How would WC fans feel if the trade look something like: Baker, Sheldrick and a top 20 pick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: GWS Giants v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Semi Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The disrespect to Gov and Scarlett putting those other blokes in that listStop smoking crack barrass is a very good full back but Lake sits alongside Gov, Rance, McPharlin, Scarlett tier of KPD of the last 20 years absurd claim
Would you trade pick 5 for 10 and 27?This works out to be pick #5 equivalent. I know precedent doesn’t account for much but what has been higher than that recently? Cameron was pick #1, Taranto pick #4
Rance and McPharlin were both elite defenders.The disrespect to Gov and Scarlett putting those other blokes in that list
Im aware, but Gov and Scarlett are the next tier above.Rance and McPharlin were both elite defenders.
Franklin rated McPharlin his toughest opponent and Rance was a 5 time all Australian and 3 time Tigers B+F.
I personally disagree. I think Rance would be there too.Im aware, but Gov and Scarlett are the next tier above
Whats a top 20 pick? Pick 17-20?How would WC fans feel if the trade look something like: Baker, Sheldrick and a top 20 pick.
That’s the AFLs point system, not my opinion.Would you trade pick 5 for 10 and 27?
No, so dont value picks like that
Thats about pick 8 or 9 value
Exactly, so its a stupid way to value trades unless the whole point of the trade is to get points for biddingThat’s the AFLs point system, not my opinion.
Was bound to happen as the writing was on the wall what with Simmo being his mate. However Simmo’s time was up and Simmo knew that as well as don’t believe his heart was in it at the end, so a bit stupid King carrying on like a pork chop lol!King's gone full salt on WCE now that Simmo's gone.
Unlike baker Barrass is contracted mate, we can get what we want.Hawks will have pick #12- #16 on the table and the eagles will just take it , They have reneged on a handshake agreement and lost confidence in barrass and if doesnt want to be there then they will just take the pick and move on
29 year old with back issues thats not happy is not a player you wantb to keep on the list
Eagles want to trade him and will take whats on offerUnlike baker Barrass is contracted mate, we can get what we want.
Nah mate, we will be getting hawks 1st and Coll 2nd, if you’re lucky you might get the Coll 2nd for that little midget.Eagles want to trade him and will take whats on offer
contracts mean nothing when the club doesnt deliver what they promised
Unhappy Barrass wont give 100% specially if the eagles dont trade him to a club thats paying him 100k more a year because they are greedy 'AGAIN' and screw him for the 2nd time
He does have back issues and could get worse
Pick #15 will do
Barrass is worth a late first to early second rounder given age and back problems. Given he’s in contract and we trade fairly our first let’s say somewhere in the early teens and some later pick swaps will get it done. Adding pies 2nd is wildly optimistic and won’t happen.Nah mate, we will be getting hawks 1st and Coll 2nd, if you’re lucky you might get the Coll 2nd for that little midget.
I see you being extremely disappointed if what you post is really what you believeNah mate, we will be getting hawks 1st and Coll 2nd, if you’re lucky you might get the Coll 2nd for that little midget.
Thats simply not true. Hes easily worth a pick in the 10-12 area, contracted adds more to it. The Pies 2nd you have is conveniently placed to be an easy addition.Barrass is worth a late first to early second rounder given age and back problems. Given he’s in contract and we trade fairly our first let’s say somewhere in the early teens and some later pick swaps will get it done. Adding pies 2nd is wildly optimistic and won’t happen.
Thats simply not true. Hes easily worth a pick in the 10-12 area, contracted adds more to it. The Pies 2nd you have is conveniently placed to be an easy addition.
His back isnt an issue, if it was the the Hawks wouldnt have 4 years on the table for him.
There is talk of guys like Dan Rioli and Dan Houston fetching 2 first rounders! Barrass is a far better player than either and only 18 months older, plays a more in demand position too.
But can you get what you need?Unlike baker Barrass is contracted mate, we can get what we want.
You can ask for what you want, but big difference in what you want and what you get!Unlike baker Barrass is contracted mate, we can get what we want.
Hypothetically what is he going to do if not traded, quit?Eagles want to trade him and will take whats on offer
contracts mean nothing when the club doesnt deliver what they promised
Unhappy Barrass wont give 100% specially if the eagles dont trade him to a club thats paying him 100k more a year because they are greedy 'AGAIN' and screw him for the 2nd time
He does have back issues and could get worse
Pick #15 will do
We can’t trade our first and our second (tied to Coll) in the same draft unless we have another first or second, which we don’tNah mate, we will be getting hawks 1st and Coll 2nd, if you’re lucky you might get the Coll 2nd for that little midget.
That sounds like a you problemWe can’t trade our first and our second (tied to Coll) in the same draft unless we have another first or second, which we don’t
Try again
Sounds like you problemThat sounds like a you problem
Its a problem you guys have to sort out. Go find another 2nd rounder.Sounds like you problem
Especially when you made the claim of us trading those to WC