A Bit Dusty
2017🏆2019🏆2020🏆
- Oct 6, 2017
- 13,595
- 39,616
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Are they in the window?
They did win a flag last last year teams don't drop off that much normally. I think they will bounce back next year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Are they in the window?
It's hard with the Pies as they've had a team that's been up near the mark (barring one anomalous disaster of a year) since 2018 - so their list profile is a lot older than those that have won their first flag as a group than general.They did win a flag last last year teams don't drop off that much normally. I think they will bounce back next year.
Saints only 2nd rounder is 24, which frankly would be a great result.From what I’ve heard it’s around the 2nd round with minimum chips going back , again absolutely not firm as it’s like 3rd hand info . But it’s from someone who told me about the Lapinski to pies and Coffield to the dogs well before they were done.
I think we would want to use that pick. A future second I could accept, begrudgingly. We have the ability to pay his entire contract, and I know it's not cumbersome to the Dogs TPP, but it is the smart play if other younger players are going to be prioritised in the Seniors over him.Saints only 2nd rounder is 24, which frankly would be a great result.
If we traded that pick in this awesome draft for a 30yo I think the members would tear the place down.Saints only 2nd rounder is 24, which frankly would be a great result.
Why would Saints give up pick 24 they can keep it they do have pick 43 so they can use that for the Macrae tradeSt Kilda wont give up #24 for Macrae
They can trade it for 2 later picks and give the later pick
41 & 57 from Richmond
Keep 41 and give 57 to doggies (57 will come into the 40's)
That makes the perfect trade thenWhy would Saints give up pick 24 they can keep it they do have pick 43 so they can use that for the Macrae trade
did geelong actually get named by gabelich?because i think many would just lump it in as melbourne when spoken in that context anywayGabelich was just on SEN saying Macrae wants to stay in Melbourne (so Geelong isn’t an option). Said St Kilda and North are making a play for him.
He Said Geelong is a no. Macraes Mrs runs a business in Malvern travel has been ruled outdid geelong actually get named by gabelich?because i think many would just lump it in as melbourne when spoken in that context anyway
Check out the 18min markdid geelong actually get named by gabelich?because i think many would just lump it in as melbourne when spoken in that context anyway
With your list how on earth are you so unsuccessful relative to the talent you have.Which one of Treloar, Libba and Bont should've he replaced? He should have had minutes ahead of Gallagher, Garcia and Sanders but that's a coaching issue.
We have no wings no small forwards and outside of a 33 year old no small defenders lots of mids and tall forwardsWith your list how on earth are you so unsuccessful relative to the talent you have.
It seems like the Dogs have a surplus of talent on every line. What a waste.
Cody Weightman isn’t a good small forward?? We will take himWe have no wings no small forwards and outside of a 33 year old no small defenders lots of mids and tall forwards
You will be lucky to get a future 4thSaints only 2nd rounder is 24, which frankly would be a great result.
Salary cap space isn’t an issueYou will be lucky to get a future 4th
Just be happy with the cap space
Its the terms/ years isn't itSalary cap space isn’t an issue
Plays like a pseudo tall most of his goals are from marks not crumbingCody Weightman isn’t a good small forward?? We will take him
I wouldn’t have a clue just going by what the media have said that it’s not a Salary cup issueIts the terms/ years isn't it