Anyone know when Hannerbery is out of contract?
He wouldn't leave Sydney anyhow, especially now nosecandy partner in crime Buddy is up there
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Anyone know when Hannerbery is out of contract?
Just a note on suggestions like these...
The player involved, if contracted, MUST agree to the trade before it can be done.
SO in this case I hardly think Cooney would be happy to leave when he has a contract.
Its for this reason why I think we wont get the deal done.
Melb want 6 and player... Any player we have of note is contracted and will most likely not wish to go there.
Hence why i liked someone else post for us to include a 3rd party.
we give up a second rounder for a player from another club that gets moved to melbourne.
I think the best deal we could get for Cooney would be something like: Compo pick + Cooney for Hawthorn's first rounder (If they're even still interested).
No one will give a first round pick for Cooney, no matter how late.. His injury issues and lack of ability to run in both directions (be that medical or by choice) will severely count against him. Should have traded him last year if we were trying to maximise what we would get from him.
You're looking at pick upgrade territory here, IMO.
I never really whipped Ray, I thought he was okay other than kicking on his wrong foot too much.Agreed. Add Farren Ray in there as well.... Like I said, we'll find other whipping boys once the current crop has left....
No chance Port get rid of Hombsch. He was great for them this year.
But Melbourne do get our pick 6. So they still have two pick inside the top 6 and they get Cooney.
Don't mind it, that would probably net us Reece McKenzie.
I never really whipped Ray, I thought he was okay other than kicking on his wrong foot too much.
I plead guilty to McMahon and Power though, I always seem to take it out on players I consider a little weak. It's funny because I never really disliked or pounded Eagle.
Ryder and his management remain confident he'd win a breach of contract case, in which case Port would get him for nothing. They've just tried to do the right thing by offering up a deal for him.Well they are getting Ryder....unless Ryder Walks then they have to give something up to make the deal happen.
Agree, I actually think Hannebery is better than Beams.Don't think that even comes close unfortunately. Hannebery would be on at least Beams level so that package might get him by himself but not Reid as well.
This would be my focus as well. Try to get a pick around 15 - 18, potentially using the Higgins compo and ???? ... Get Lever/Durdin at Pick 6. Get McKenzie at 18 (say). Add in Talia, Roberts and a fit Roughead and our KPP stocks beyond 2015 are looking good. Some potential pain next year, but longer term gain...
This would be my focus as well. Try to get a pick around 15 - 18, potentially using the Higgins compo and ???? ... Get Lever/Durdin at Pick 6. Get McKenzie at 18 (say). Add in Talia, Roberts and a fit Roughead and our KPP stocks beyond 2015 are looking good. Some potential pain next year, but longer term gain...
The 4 most maligned players in the past decade all out in the 1 season.
Higgins, Cooney, Jones and Gia (although his love was restored).
Throw out Austin to make it 5!!
Ryder and his management remain confident he'd win a breach of contract case, in which case Port would get him for nothing. They've just tried to do the right thing by offering up a deal for him.
I'd wager Essendon will eventually cave. Just as they did with Crameri last year. A little different with Ryder being contracted, but I doubt they want to get into more legal crap.
This is my thinking also, do you think McKenzie will still be around at 18?
Agree, he came as a purely outside player. Exactly what we got him for, he was lambasted as being soft for it. Then he turned into a run-with type player and put his head over the ball no problems.Eagle was the most missed player out the group that retired when he did. Not in terms of history or significance or games played etc - but purely from an on-field perspective. We've really struggled to replace his run and carry....
This is my thinking also, do you think McKenzie will still be around at 18?
yes well if Cooney is really on the table, then we need to maximise that and make sure we get a late first rounder. It gives us insurance if we can't get one of the big 2. A second or 3rd rounder for Cooney does not get the job done.
Ryder and his management remain confident he'd win a breach of contract case, in which case Port would get him for nothing. They've just tried to do the right thing by offering up a deal for him.
I'd wager Essendon will eventually cave. Just as they did with Crameri last year. A little different with Ryder being contracted, but I doubt they want to get into more legal crap.
Annoys me how people say Ray was a wasted draft pick. He's had a solid career.
Draft order in 2003:
1. Cooney -219 games
2. Walker - 179 games
3. Sylvia - 163 games
4. Ray - 197 games
5. McLean - 157 games
6. Bradley 117 games
7. Tenace 59 games
8. R.Clarke - 85 games
9. Trotter - 7 games
10. R.Dunn - 8 games
11. Waters 120 games
12. Ry.Murphy 48 games
13. Stanton -226 games
14. F.Watts - 6 games
15. Chaplin - 185 games
You forgot Matthew Boyd ...... Melbourne could use him for a kicking skills coachIf Cooney wants to go as well then great! This trade/draft period could go down as the one where we clear all the dead wood and one's who won't carry us forward and get in players who actually work hard.
We're losing all out whipping boys though
If Essendon are interested in Cooney the deal should be pick 17 to us Cooney and a couple of 2nd rounders to Essendon.The talk is that Cooney could be part of the Port deal with Essendon to get Ryder. Essendon want a player, they want Wines or Wingard of course. There is talk that the dogs may consider moving Cooney for the right deal and I reckon the media guys have joined the dots.
The issue I have with it is that Port will still have to give their pick 17 to Essendon. So that leaves us with their pick 37! Now unless there is massive issues with Coons and the club then that's unders for a 27 year old who still has his pace. If we can conjure a late first rounder for Cooney and there are issues between him and the club I would take it.
He's been a reasonable player, but nothing more. Clearly best 22, but bottom end of that - which is where people start to believe it's a waste. High pick and all that, should do better than just reasonable. But this highlights the difficulties with drafting - you can have good picks, but not the talent in the areas you need.
But if you get 200 games out of a player, you can say you have done well.
Not every draft is equal though. If you blew the 2012 'Macrae and Stringer' draft you'd be spewing.