Is he needed? Half back is one of our strongest and deepest areasNot sure if mention but would anyone be keen for Harbrow to return to the dogs.
Left on good terms and could be a good option alongside JJ off half back
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is he needed? Half back is one of our strongest and deepest areasNot sure if mention but would anyone be keen for Harbrow to return to the dogs.
Left on good terms and could be a good option alongside JJ off half back
He could play the wing and forward kinda like what's happening to JJ atmIs he needed? Half back is one of our strongest and deepest areas
Not sure if mention but would anyone be keen for Harbrow to return to the dogs.
Left on good terms and could be a good option alongside JJ off half back
Not sure if mention but would anyone be keen for Harbrow to return to the dogs.
Left on good terms and could be a good option alongside JJ off half back
Sure Harbrow turns it over, but he looks wonderful doing it.
That's what I was getting at. A club would definitely pay 500k for Goldy. Frees up 400 for Nth to have a crack at Kelly/Martin. Goldy is worth 500 if Mayne is on 500 x 4 easily.No-one would. But someone would take him at $450-$500k. North get a second round pick in and free up close to $500k in the cap.
Kinda like Collingwood should just pay out Chris Mayne, save a little money and fill that list spot with a kid.
I reckon we would in a heartbeat.Who would take Goldstein for $900k per year though? NM would have to throw in a first round pick to get rid of that salary
Harbrow, Tippett, Goldstein, ????
Haven't we got enough players already on our rookie list?
He keeps dropping his coffee just like he dropped that chest mark in the last quarter of the Prelim!That's some poor service. He'd now be ready for our forward line service
Patton to dogs confirmed
Sherman!!! You have just sent me back to therapy I thought I had forgotten about him.Jarrod Harbrow.
Of all the players that we have lost in recent years, he's the one that I don't miss at all when I see him running fast and invariably turning the ball over.
That we burnt the compensation pick on Just Sherman bothers me more. Justin Sherman!!!
That's hilarious. What a disaster that project has been.Nah. His best footy was 2009-2010, has gone massively downhill since leaving.
He has still won more games at the Doggies than the Meter Maids
Why are supporters willing to clutch at straws and think topping up our list with 30yo players is required ? I'm serious. Is there something I'm missing ? I see our list. I see some deficiencies. But surely with our list demographic we SHOULD be looking for 24-27 yo players who :-
1. Slot straight in to our best 25
2. Addresses those deficiencies.
3. Will be part of our drive to be a front runner for years.
To compromise and settle for other clubs cast offs is what desperate teams do. Are we desperate ? No. Unless somebody can demonstrate to me otherwise.
Our 2017 season MIGHT not get us what we wanted ( I haven't given up yet !) but if anybody thinks we are not already in the top bracket of team lists I'm dumbfounded
We are about to lose 2 or 3 vets, ( 2 now looking more likely if Moz gets his way) but as many of our young guns are getting into that 50-100 games bracket I don't buy the historic " we need experience" argument. Our young squad won a GF ffs and despite the doomsayers, are still in the hunt this year. And will be for a few years yet. I love the talk about a Lever type. A grade, right age, long term reward. Or a Charlie Cameron who gives us something we do not have. But I don't understand the chat on Tippett, Harbrow, Goldy et al. Do we want to end up like Norf ?
Similarly, I don't care if we trade away ALL our high picks to get the players we need that fit that age bracket. We have been longing for a list like we have, our time is NOW. Forget 5 years time, footy landscape changes by the season these days and great list management is a vital ingredient to remain competitive
Come at me folks !
What about Majak as a second ruck who floats forward a bit?
What about Majak as a second ruck who floats forward a bit?
What about Majak as a second ruck who floats forward a bit?
Let Collingwood have Harbrow. Its almost like they're trying to assemble the most inept backline ever.