Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
With it sounding like we want one good 1st rounder, I can see it being just for their future 1st. We take the risk that they have another good year, they take a risk if they drop off.Yield to none.
This has to be about putting a line in the sand to stop us being pilfered by the big clubs, especially with JUH up next.
The Cats 1st and Future 1st have to be part of the deal.
What do you thinkAny worthy discussion on the main trading board?
No..?
I wouldt be happy with this at all. Future picks are inherently devalued by their nature. It's a pick for a guy you wont play until 2026 minimum froma side currently running deep in finals.With it sounding like we want one good 1st rounder, I can see it being just for their future 1st. We take the risk that they have another good year, they take a risk if they drop off.
It'd have to be the F1 plus their second round pick this year.I wouldt be happy with this at all. Future picks are inherently devalued by their nature. It's a pick for a guy you wont play until 2026 minimum froma side currently running deep in finals.
Which is why we should have done it already with Dunkley.If you keep accepting unders - you'll forever be offered unders by every other team. Smith won't be the last high value player to request a trade.
If it is true that Geelong's contract offer is not better than our, what's stopping us redrafting Smith ahead of Geelong in the PSD?
Which is fine if all we have to do is let Geelong know that they are guaranteed to miss out on him. If Richmond don't want him we'll take him one way or another through the PSD. We'll be fine because that's equalisation doing its job - as he's requesting a trade to a team that finished higher and not lower than us on the ladder.Richmond having pick 1 in the PSD
Under 50% of players taken in the 20s become long-term best 22 players.I'm happy for the club to go full chaos mode if it's just pick 20ish. Pick value drops off steeply and by the time you're in the 20s the draft is a crapshoot. It's not even giving that much up to make a point.
It would also be endlessly funny
I just wish it was North.Richmond having pick 1 in the PSD
If you keep accepting unders - you'll forever be offered unders by every other team. Smith won't be the last high value player to request a trade.
With the depth of this years draft I’d prefer a 2024 first rounder over next yearWith it sounding like we want one good 1st rounder, I can see it being just for their future 1st. We take the risk that they have another good year, they take a risk if they drop off.
Yes he can nominate for the National Draft i remember Luke Ball going down that pathCan someone confirm that he could actually nominate for the national draft?
I actually doubt he'd nominate PSD if thats the case. He'd probably nominate the national draft where he'd be much more likely to get through to Geelong. CLubs would be a lot more hesitant about using a high pick on him
Doubt it's that much. Would guess the Cotton On sponsorship to Geelong is $1M.Has anyone mentioned yet he has a massive modeling contract with Cotton On, who also sponsor the Geelong FC? He would be making more money off field than on it.
No surprise if he goes to geelong with a pay cut, Cotton On can make up for it by chucking an extra 500k on his contract
Under 50% of players taken in the 20s become long-term best 22 players.
I mean we’ve taken Dylan Addison, Toby McLean, Josh Dunkley, Kieran Collins, Jesse Wells, Will Minson and Charlie Clarke in that range. It’s a crap shoot by then.
They can GAGF if that’s it.