Recruiting Trade & Free Agency VI

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Why was trade period done for longer than a week again?

Surely the afl cant be that hungry for clicks?

And what this about a televised event on wednesday?
I think your second line is the answer to your third line, if you substitute clicks for views anyway.
 
From memory, the AFL did give them access to older players with different incentives, but other than taking Ward, Davis and a couple of others, they used them to trade for more high picks.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Not really
Except we could list anyone who had previously nominated for the draft and was not on a list. We did get Adam Kennedy that way. He was passed over in 2011.

We were loaded up with talented youngsters and expected to trade for experience and a balanced list. Although the intent of the mini-drafts was we had to trade for players. We weren't actually prohibited from trading them for picks, and we did.

Generally the club wasn't happy with the expectation 9f what we would give up the high draft picks for, so we kept them.

For the Bears start up as I understand it they could take a player from every list, and the existing clubs didn't want to do that again.

I'm certainly not whinging we got unprecedented concessions because there was real fear we wouldn't make it in foreign territory, but the AFL was determined to break into the market. A committee set up the rules which were signed off by all the ckubs and the AFL. The club staff then acted in the club's interest to get the best out of them.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Not really
Except we could list anyone who had previously nominated for the draft and was not on a list. We did get Adam Kennedy that way. He was passed over in 2011.

We were loaded up with talented youngsters and expected to trade for experience and a balanced list. Although the intent of the mini-drafts was we had to trade for players. We weren't actually prohibited from trading them for picks, and we did.

Generally the club wasn't happy with the expectation 9f what we would give up the high draft picks for, so we kept them.

For the Bears start up as I understand it they could take a player from every list, and the existing clubs didn't want to do that again.

I'm certainly not whinging we got unprecedented concessions because there was real fear we wouldn't make it in foreign territory, but the AFL was determined to break into the market. A committee set up the rules which were signed off by all the ckubs and the AFL. The club staff then acted in the club's interest to get the best out of them.
The clubs set the concessions up the way they were because they knew they would be able to plunder the expansion teams down the track. I think GWS had the option to get the older uncontracted players the same as Gold Coast, and chose to target younger players like Ward and Davis as opposed to offering out pensions to players like Bock and Brown. It seems pretty obvious which method has worked best.

I think it's actually worked out well with GWS not gifted a flag, but able to stay up the pointy end of both the draft and ladder for the time being.
 
Barret reckons the deal will go down tomorow
He was questioned about whether the media influences the club's thinking about the value of players ("because Trade Radio always gets it right"). According to him, the role of the media is to describe what is happening but they don't influence the clubs, and he of course always knows the whispers and therefore only says what is actually happening, never speculates or bullshits or anything, and that's why Trade Radio is always right... :rolleyes:

I therefore look forward to finding out who manages to start the Welcome thread when it becomes official tomorrow. If Damo says it Then it must be true.
 
He was questioned about whether the media influences the club's thinking about the value of players ("because Trade Radio always gets it right"). According to him, the role of the media is to describe what is happening but they don't influence the clubs, and he of course always knows the whispers and therefore only says what is actually happening, never speculates or bullshits or anything, and that's why Trade Radio is always right... :rolleyes:

I therefore look forward to finding out who manages to start the Welcome thread when it becomes official tomorrow. If Damo says it Then it must be true.
Surprised Barrett's most recent "Sliding doors" hasn't stirred up the nuffies a bit more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top