Trade hypotheticals

[Bay Pie]

Angus Brayshaw is the early tip for pick 2. If Brayshaw shows the type of output Tom Mitchell has over his 1st 3 years you'd be very happy. Not forgetting the Swans have the best and deepest midfield in the comp while finishing premiers, PFist and now premiership favourites.

Draft picks are overrated. Tom Mitchell is known AFL commodity and still very young. He'll cost plenty to lure him and he's not going in the PSD of any year. Every team in the comp would love this kid and would pay quite heavily for him.

 

[Footy Mad]

I agree with that. Don't see Geelong offering Guthrie though.

Yeah Guthrie seems a bit of a stretch. Hunt defensive tagger suits Roos style. But Im sure a deal will be done.

 

[eastfreo75]

The PSD at the end of 2016?

my bad

 

[Pure_Ownage]

Yeah Guthrie seems a bit of a stretch. Hunt defensive tagger suits Roos style. But Im sure a deal will be done.

Hunt might go to Melbourne but not for pick 2. That's insane.

 

[Footy Mad]

Hunt might go to Melbourne but not for pick 2. That's insane.

Never said it would be for pick 2 only.

 

[Andy_Mac]

Never said it would be for pick 2 only.

Since you know everything, where is the ignore button?

 

[markm106]

Never said it would be for pick 2 only.

What else would be involved? Need to be a fair bit for pick 2.

 

[Dez!]

Hunt might go to Melbourne but not for pick 2. That's insane.

Read the rest of his posts, his head is stuck up his own ass.

Convinced Melbourne and Geelong will engage in tampering talks.

 

[Andy_Mac]

Read the rest of his posts, his head is stuck up his own ass.

Convinced Melbourne and Geelong will engage in tampering talks.

I just found the ignore button. Sweet relief...

You can only read the same tripe in 10 different threads for so long.

 

[Footy Mad]

Read the rest of his posts, his head is stuck up his own ass.

Convinced Melbourne and Geelong will engage in tampering talks.

Tampering talks LMAO your muppets for sure.

 

[Dez!]

Tampering talks LMAO your muppets for sure.

You keep harping on about Geelong doing Melbourne a favour giving Frawley a contract that will get them pick 3 so they can trade pick 2 to Geelong for Taylor Hunt.

 

[markm106]

You keep harping on about Geelong doing Melbourne a favour giving Frawley a contract that will get them pick 3 so they can trade pick 2 to Geelong for Taylor Hunt.

Certainly makes absolutely no sense. Plus AFL wouldn't allow 2 for Hunt.

 

[Andy_Mac]

Certainly makes absolutely no sense. Plus AFL wouldn't allow 2 for Hunt.

Dude 2 is going to the dogs for Minson. We are close to finalising Liam Jones and Tutt for P3 over on our board. Apparently Jones will allow us to play Hogan at FB.

 

[Footy Mad]

Certainly makes absolutely no sense. Plus AFL wouldn't allow 2 for Hunt.

Geelong will do what is best for Geelong to improve their list. Few will get to see the inside machinations. Geelong are playing the game.

 

[Flags_In_The_Bag]

Dogs fans including myself would be melting hard if that happened.

why?

 

[markm106]

Geelong will do what is best for Geelong to improve their list. Few will get to see the inside machinations. Geelong are playing the game.

So Melbourne won't do what's best for Melbourne. And how will AFL sign off on 2 for Hunt.

 

[Flags_In_The_Bag]

Dude 2 is going to the dogs for Minson. We are close to finalising Liam Jones and Tutt for P3 over on our board. Apparently Jones will allow us to play Hogan at FB.

Lol if that happened id be over the moon ...lol

 

[Zephiisdaman]

Can't pay a first rounder for a player who will be 30 next year, as good as Minson is. What sort of players would Dogs need/what sort of value would they put on Minson?

I do think we'll target an experienced ruck, we are pobably a good chance to lose ether McIntosh or Simpson to injury retirement and our ruck stocks are way too thin, but I'm not seeing heaps of options. Ryder will only go North, I know we targeted Clarke very heavily before he re-signed last year but he's not an option now. The best available is probably Giles if he doesn't go back to SA.

You may have to pay overs for a decent option.
Look I doubt Big Will will get traded but I would suggest to get quality you have to give quality.
Will still has 5 years of footy in his body, very durable (unlike H-Mac). It would have to be either a good trade or else your first rounder, there is no way your second rounder does it.

 

[Headless]

You may have to pay overs for a decent option.
Look I doubt Big Will will get traded but I would suggest to get quality you have to give quality.
Will still has 5 years of footy in his body, very durable (unlike H-Mac). It would have to be either a good trade or else your first rounder, there is no way your second rounder does it.

Was Minson not dropped the other week?

 

[Footy Mad]

So Melbourne won't do what's best for Melbourne. And how will AFL sign off on 2 for Hunt.

You guys are fixated with the AFL helping .... the AFL is not a charity.

Cats will make Demons an offer - simple. If Demons dont take it FINE. Cats already have Frawley for free ... now they are playing the game - as they should.

 

[Pure_Ownage]

You may have to pay overs for a decent option.
Look I doubt Big Will will get traded but I would suggest to get quality you have to give quality.
Will still has 5 years of footy in his body, very durable (unlike H-Mac). It would have to be either a good trade or else your first rounder, there is no way your second rounder does it.

Lake at about the same age, who arguably had a better career to that point, was #41 and a +6 (and the Dogs ended up doing fairly well with those picks). There is no way you are getting a first rounder for Minson, from us or anyone.

 

[markm106]

You guys are fixated with the AFL helping .... the AFL is not a charity.

Cats will make Demons an offer - simple. If Demons dont take it FINE. Cats already have Frawley for free ... now they are playing the game - as they should.

Its not about helping Melbourne its about trading pick 2 for Hunt. AFL won't sign off on it. I would rather band 2 compo than Hunt.

 

[Footy Mad]

Its not about helping Melbourne its about trading pick 2 for Hunt. AFL won't sign off on it. I would rather band 2 compo than Hunt.

What I think you DONT understand is .... now the nicest way to put this is .... you are not the most desirable location. Players dont overly like playing in front of 15,000 that boo they off the ground.

Mate what you want and then convincing the player to go is very difficult. Its not your call ... the player has to agree.

The AFL dont intervene if both sides agree. YOU dont have to agree to Cats offers. You might want a Guthrie but if he refuses to leave a successful club thats your problem.

 

[Oddhawk]

I agree with that. Don't see Geelong offering Guthrie though.

To get Danger?? May well be worth it if you're giving up Guthrie, 13 and 33.

 

[go you pups]

Lake at about the same age, who arguably had a better career to that point, was #41 and a +6 (and the Dogs ended up doing fairly well with those picks). There is no way you are getting a first rounder for Minson, from us or anyone.

Minson and our 2nd (25ish) for your 1st rounder and a fringe player with potential is the type of deal the Dogs would push for if they would trade him. That scenario is similar to the Lake one.