- Oct 14, 2011
- 9,668
- 13,505
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Frawley contracted until 2014 isn't he? If the rumor has any merit would should throw everything we can to land him, though I don;t we have anything the Demons would be interested in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trade out our most versatile young midfielder to address a deficiency in versatile young midfielders? hmmmm
Rumours on the D&T board that Frawley wants out of Melbourne.
He could be a good option for us. Would cost a fair bit to land him, but it might be worth it.
He more than holds his own in the Melbourne defense, AA in 2010, he would blossom in our team.He's only a few cm taller than gibson, admittedly i haven't seen many melbourne games but is he the 'gorilla' we're after? Not rejecting the idea, just curious...
Not sure if you watched the GF but centre clearances were not an issue (19-5). We needed players who could cover the ground with defensive running. Whitecross would have helped a lot.Another way of saying that is ..... move on a jack of all trades (master of none) for a specialist centre clearance extractor.
He is not undersized though. Look at Scarlett or Silvagni, two of the better FB's or recent times and they were both 193-4cm. To be a KPD doesn't mean you have to be 200cm tall, you just need to be able to defend well one on one and that's what Frawley does well.You can never have too many undersized key defenders......
Getting Frawley would be tough because of what he is and his importance to Melbourne.
We would have to part with a good player and picks. Similar to what we would have to give up for an elite midfielder.
It's unlikely IMO. Melbourne would ask for something like pick 22 and Sewell.
Would any club consider playing Dawes as a big bodied defender? Just putting it out there.
Not sure if you watched the GF but centre clearances were not an issue (19-5). We needed players who could cover the ground with defensive running. Whitecross would have helped a lot.
Young and ellis bundled out with our first pick I;d feel would almost get the deal done, though Melbourne unless they really had their arm twisted Frawley wont be moving anywhere. For the sake of Melbourne you would hope he stayed.Why would Melbourne want an elite 28 year old midfielder?
The Dees want players under the age of 25. To get Frawley we'd have to give them our first pick plus one or two players under the age of 25.
They may ask for 2 players... say Savage, Whitecross and our first pick
Really don't see how a deal could be done
Young and ellis bundled out with our first pick I;d feel would almost get the deal done, though Melbourne unless they really had their arm twisted Frawley wont be moving anywhere. For the sake of Melbourne you would hope he stayed.
Would any club consider playing Dawes as a big bodied defender? Just putting it out there.
Back page of the Sun, "Dane shown the Dawes" Now where is my overly priced pay cheque.I forecast another boatload of "Dawes" puns in the future, whether we are involved or not
Would any club consider playing Dawes as a big bodied defender? Just putting it out there.
Well as I see it we have Guerra, Burchall, Burgoyne, Suckling, Stratton, Murphy, Gibson(and if necessary Poupolo and Shiels) doing essentially the same thing whereas there is only one Mitch and he's 30. Any statistician will tell you that clearances are a vital indices in winning games and I worry about where ours are going to come from post Mitchell and Sewell (or in the case of injury).