Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 100,983
- 253,686
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Moderator
- #18,956
2024 Picks
2025 Picks
2025 Picks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think players like Sims Zak Johnson Charlie Nicholls might get as deep as 45 or later so if we can trade back for our benefit then all good. But equally I think there is a world where at 33 Faull and Gerreyn are available and you simply take one even Sims works for me. It’s a nice place to be.That's my thinking & why it would likely only be considered on Draft Night:
1. Who is still there, &,
2. Do we have bigger plans for 2025 & beyond.
This play would give us 2x 2025 1sts, with the ability to trade 2x future 1sts. Pick purchasing could net us another 1st, so there's a scenario where we could access 5x 1sts in 2025, if all played out that way.
I reckon I'd look to sell a late 1st to keep our side together or help fund role-specific targets via Free Agency (LDU etc. ).
This. There will be no juggling it's a trade for a target or pick 33.Think it’s pretty simple.
We either trade up 33 for an earlier pick (with futures) or sit tight and use 33.
Match a bid on Cody (ideally late so no deficit). Possibly a bid goes a lot earlier then we like and we pass - then we may try to trade up (if have anything left).
Re-rookie Gunston.
Yeah, I don't see anything else happening.This. There will be no juggling it's a trade for a target or pick 33.
That is a lot. Yuck.Moving up the order in this draft is going to cost a fortune. Does 33 + F1 + F2 get Pick 18 from Richmond?
Moving up the order in this draft is going to cost a fortune. Does 33 + F1 + F2 get Pick 18 from Richmond?
Cost will be high. But if there’s a guy we rate as say top 10 available we may pull the trigger.We can't do that trade. If you trade your future first, you must have a future second and future third. In that scenario, we would have neither.
A trade of our future first would require a future third coming back next year which would further jack up the price.
Moving up in this draft will require a significant overpay. "Best" deal we'd get (IMO) is 33 + F1 to GWS for 21 and F3.
At that price I'd prefer staying at 33. Then again, if you nail the pick, it's always worth it.
Yeah we won't upgrade for the sake of it. It will only be for a specific couple or so players that may have slipped.This draft is mainly rated so highly due to the depth of talent in the draft pool. The expectation is that some seriously good kids can be picked in the 30-50 range, which hasn't been the case for some years.
Personally I would prefer to see us grab the best available talent at pick 33, rather than throwing the kitchen sink at a 10-12 pick upgrade.
IMO the Weddle draft night trade upgrade was a little different, as that particular draft was viewed as much shallower for top end talent, and we clearly identified Josh as a player we were extremely keen to get.
Me neither, trading just for the sake of, is ridiculous. We're where we are for a reason.I don’t get the fascination with having to trade just to ensure we have a first round selection in the 2024 draft.
I really like this. Trade out and arm themselves with a huge hand next year.That's my thinking & why it would likely only be considered on Draft Night:
1. Who is still there, &,
2. Do we have bigger plans for 2025 & beyond.
This play would give us 2x 2025 1sts, with the ability to trade 2x future 1sts. Pick purchasing could net us another 1st, so there's a scenario where we could access 5x 1sts in 2025, if all played out that way.
I reckon I'd look to sell a late 1st to keep our side together or help fund role-specific targets via Free Agency (LDU etc. ).
I don’t get the fascination with having to trade just to ensure we have a first round selection in the 2024 draft. We don’t have a first round pick for a reason. And we don’t need to. Great case of FOMO.
Thankfully those in charge have more logic in their decision making.
No….Yes....
Yes, it does....
Sorry, I should rephrase. I can't see pick 33 and a F1 moving us too far up the draft board in a highly toughted draft where hawthorn is tipped to do well next year.Moving up the order in this draft is going to cost a fortune. Does 33 + F1 + F2 get Pick 18 from Richmond?
Sorry, I should rephrase. I can't see pick 33 and a F1 moving us too far up the draft board in a highly toughted draft where hawthorn is tipped to do well next year.
Apologies, carlton also tipped to do well.Yeah, but it's not our F1