mmmdoughnuts
Debutant
Any help??
Go option 1, Tapscott is safe and will net you some much needed cash. The rest of the mid pricers will go down in price far less then what Tapscott will make.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Any help??
Blokes with Hibberd... Whats the go? Trade him out for Curnow orr ?
Also have a worry in the backs with Evirett but there isn't anyone i can replace him for, maybe Adcock?
Thoughts?
It would be nice actually...would force a few more different options.What if Curnow starts as sub tonight... throw's the cat amongst the pigeons and will p!ss off a lot of people that have already traded him in.
22. If you count finals, 26how many weeks will Buckley miss?
Unless i trust adcock or Suckling its gonna have to be gram and goodbye swallow. Please give me ur input! Lol
Trade out Atley, I get the feeling he will be dropped next week so you might have some problems there....Trade out Atley or Foley for Curnow?
Foley would give me $140k in flexibility for future trades.
Atley still has question marks over him.
Ughh...
Help please...
Knights (221k) to Tapscott (97k) = 120k in the bank.
Both would probably average similar scores
or
C.Richardson (97k) to Tapscott (97k) = 0k in the bank
Get rid of a lower scoring player (compared to knights) and get to keep knights.
Currently have Knights playing and Richardson on bench.
If you have Heppell in your midfield then it's an easy decision the first one. If Buckley is the only player in your midfield with defense capabilities then it is a hard decision.Buckley to Curnow. (Removes Mid-Def Link)
or
Atley to Curnow. (Keeps Mid-Def Link)