- Moderator
- #1,701
True.They were in the form of their lives before Fraudgate got a hold of them and they had to play with an oil tanker up front.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True.They were in the form of their lives before Fraudgate got a hold of them and they had to play with an oil tanker up front.
No you didn't.Told you Spain would win it after seeing them beat Italy. 2008 repeat Celtics-Spain, and a Spaniard wins Wimbledon.
That seems a rather odd way to view it. Each to their own.England win and most would be perfectly fine with the shit football they played for 90% of the tournament.
But given they didn't win, I'm pretty sure most would rather they were braver, more creative, more attacking even if it meant they got knocked out before the final.
You’re right, Everyone stopped caring about how they played the second they beat the Netherlands, and started caring again the second they lost to Spain.England win and most would be perfectly fine with the shit football they played for 90% of the tournament.
But given they didn't win, I'm pretty sure most would rather they were braver, more creative, more attacking even if it meant they got knocked out before the final.
They were in the form of their lives before Fraudgate got a hold of them and they had to play with an oil tanker up front.
England win and most would be perfectly fine with the shit football they played for 90% of the tournament.
But given they didn't win, I'm pretty sure most would rather they were braver, more creative, more attacking even if it meant they got knocked out before the final.
Have France stopped producing creative central midfielders?Not the way I viewed the Les Bleus campaign.
I felt it would have been a travesty if they went on to win this Euros with negative dull football. That's simply not the French way. Would rather they were knocked out in the second round going all out attack.
Have France stopped producing creative central midfielders?
Unequivocally agree with this.England win and most would be perfectly fine with the shit football they played for 90% of the tournament.
But given they didn't win, I'm pretty sure most would rather they were braver, more creative, more attacking even if it meant they got knocked out before the final.
Shaken, not stirred.
This embodies all of England's issues. Not attacking enough, always looking for safe options. Went back to Pickford who couldn't maintain possession under the press and hoofs it for a goal kick to the opponent.
If you are are giving out the Golden Glove (which relies on having a good team defence as well) that's a different thing altogether, But he was clear of everyone in terms of saves, a number of them being crazy ones.I don’t know about that. He conceded 8 goals in 4 matches.
He was pretty outstanding at the Euros. Made a heap of great saves.I don’t know about that. He conceded 8 goals in 4 matches.
If you are are giving out the Golden Glove (which relies on having a good team defence as well) that's a different thing all together, But he was clear of everyone in terms of saves, a number of them being crazy ones.
He was pretty outstanding at the Euros. Made a heap of great saves.