Why do umpires choose to pay free kicks on assumption based on a result. It really gets my goat when players are accused of high tackles that arent there, throws that were actually hand balls and defenders accused of arm slaps all because the forward drops the ball. Oh and the assumption a defender didnt touch the ball and a goal is called.
That is very bad umpiring and I am a firm beleiver in facts. If you didnt see the incident for ****s sake dont call a free kick. you only get proved wrong and made to look like a twat.
As for touched balls being called goals, the video review is there. If a player stands in the ****ing goal square wanting to kick the ball out because he is in the beleif he touched the ball and you call a goal for ****s sake check the replay. Thats what the replays are there for. ****ING DISPUTES.
The AFL didnt just decide to put it in for shits and giggles. ****ING USE IT!!!!
That is very bad umpiring and I am a firm beleiver in facts. If you didnt see the incident for ****s sake dont call a free kick. you only get proved wrong and made to look like a twat.
As for touched balls being called goals, the video review is there. If a player stands in the ****ing goal square wanting to kick the ball out because he is in the beleif he touched the ball and you call a goal for ****s sake check the replay. Thats what the replays are there for. ****ING DISPUTES.
The AFL didnt just decide to put it in for shits and giggles. ****ING USE IT!!!!