stewie griffen
Make me an Admin!
And they all start coming round.... Muhahahahahaha
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
At what? Not managing minutes?Tom Thibodeau is the best coach in the NBA
Hey anytime you can play mike d for 48 minutes you have to... rightAt what? Not managing minutes?
When presented the opportunity, it is an NBA head coach's responsibility to do so.Hey anytime you can play mike d for 48 minutes you have to... right
Westbrook is a top 5-7 player, neither of those guys are as good or fit on the Thunder any better.OKC should look at trading Westbrook for Rondo or Love
2. ExplainWestbrook is a top 5-7 player, neither of those guys are as good or fit on the Thunder any better.
My stupid 3 opinions are thus:
1. Only LeBron, Durant are clearly better than Westbrook. He's somewhere in the next bracket with George, Paul and Griffin.
2. Dirk should be ranked higher than KG on the PF list.
3. David Lee isnt that bad of a defender. Love is much worse.
Can't say I agree with this at all. The best defensive teams in the league recently have been Chicago, Indy, Memphis .... all with dominant big men.
Dwight Howard would not have scored more points in the 90s. Hakeem, David Robinson and Shaq could average 25-30 ppg - Dwight? Nope.
The bolded is a myth. I'd disagree with the Griffen >> Aldridge summation too, but that's a matter of opinion.
Centres are still the most important players defensively and can have a massive impact upon their teams fortunes at the defensive end. But given so much of the play is on the perimeter, centres have less of an impact defensively than they had in previous generations.
Dwight would have almost certainly averaged a handful of points more per game in a league where players put up far fewer threes. In that environment, Howard suddenly becomes one of the most efficient scorers on the floor - even with his dreadful offensive game. Similarly Hakeem, Robinson and Shaq would all be less dominant offensively if they began their careers today because the game has shifted so much towards the three.
Takes too many mid-range jumpers for my liking. Much like Melo he can obviously shoot but mid-range jumpers are the worst shots in basketball. Aldridge is more a volume scorer at this point in time, compared with someone like Griffen who is much more efficient (even if he has little range).
This just sounds like you're repeating a mantra - the difference between Aldridge shooting a mid-range jumper and Brandon Jennings is:
a) Aldridge makes a higher than average percentage of mid-range shots
b) Aldridge does not have three point range, so he is not eschewing that shot in order to take a low percentage look
c) Aldridge can score deep in the low post, but that is i) not his absolute strength, and ii) easier for the defense to collapse in on and guard
More importantly, Aldridge's mid-range game is the pivot upon which Portland's entire offense is built - an offense which ranks number one in the league.
Aldridge does not score many easy buckets in transition like Griffin does, and unlike Griffin he cannot use raw athleticism to overpower his defender and shoot lay-ups and dunks. He scores 'contested' points in half-court sets, and those are invaluable. Very few guys in the league can guard him straight up, which means the defense has to adjust for him... at which point the Blazers move the ball around the perimeter and hit the open shot.
Stats can lie. Cory Brewer cannot shoot a lick, yet he's shooting 47% on the season. How? Because he hits three or four uncontested lay-ups a game off outlet passes made by Kevin Love - it's a high percentage shot, but there is no residual benefit to the team. His teammates do not enjoy more open looks because Brewer shoots 47%, but Aldridge's teammates benefit enormously from his presence. He is thus FAR from inefficient, no matter what stats say.
not to mention he comes across as a bit of a tossbagNot really due to anything he has done himself, but due to the media and advertisements etc. over the last few years Griffin will always have a feeling of overrated to me, until he maybe wins some championships or is the best player in the league.
not to mention he comes across as a bit of a tossbag
I'd actually go the other way, this year (not this season) Blake has been a top 5 player, that's how good he has been lately.
If he could push his midrange percentages up by 5% he'd be close to unstoppable
Westbrook is a top 5-7 player, neither of those guys are as good or fit on the Thunder any better.
My stupid 3 opinions are thus:
1. Only LeBron, Durant are clearly better than Westbrook. He's somewhere in the next bracket with George, Paul and Griffin.
2. Dirk should be ranked higher than KG on the PF list.
Agree totally. KG has always been overrated slightly in my eyes
3. David Lee isnt that bad of a defender. Love is much worse.
Damn. This is an absolutely perfect write up!This just sounds like you're repeating a mantra - the difference between Aldridge shooting a mid-range jumper and Brandon Jennings is:
a) Aldridge makes a higher than average percentage of mid-range shots
b) Aldridge does not have three point range, so he is not eschewing that shot in order to take a low percentage look
c) Aldridge can score deep in the low post, but that is i) not his absolute strength, and ii) easier for the defense to collapse in on and guard
More importantly, Aldridge's mid-range game is the pivot upon which Portland's entire offense is built - an offense which ranks number one in the league.
Aldridge does not score many easy buckets in transition like Griffin does, and unlike Griffin he cannot use raw athleticism to overpower his defender and shoot lay-ups and dunks. He scores 'contested' points in half-court sets, and those are invaluable. Very few guys in the league can guard him straight up, which means the defense has to adjust for him... at which point the Blazers move the ball around the perimeter and hit the open shot.
Stats can lie. Cory Brewer cannot shoot a lick, yet he's shooting 47% on the season. How? Because he hits three or four uncontested lay-ups a game off outlet passes made by Kevin Love - it's a high percentage shot, but there is no residual benefit to the team. His teammates do not enjoy more open looks because Brewer shoots 47%, but Aldridge's teammates benefit enormously from his presence. He is thus FAR from inefficient, no matter what stats say.
I love this kind of stuff, and think there should be more of it in basketball.
Can't wait for the 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys later this year.
Yeah the glory days of ball
Ask yourself this, how many free throws would MJ have shot per game if they officiated those games the way they do today