NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Facebook getting rid of fact checkers. Says election was a cultural tipping point and needs to embrace free speech. Going with twitter style community notes.

People on the 'right' have become everything they ever claimed was bad about 'the left'.

"Feelings don't care about your facts"...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Just a quick aside.
With all of the evidence and information I've provided you with...
Do you think that there was a single thing that the Taliban did in breach of 'the agreement', while Trump was 'in charge'?
Yes but you are comparing like stealing a pen from the bank to robbing the entire joint and clearing the safe out which is what the takeover was .

If you are going to re start a war you need more evidence of a failed agreement then Trump admin had
 
Yes but you are comparing like stealing a pen from the bank to robbing the entire joint and clearing the safe out which is what the takeover was .

If you are going to re start a war you need more evidence of a failed agreement then Trump admin had
What would you consider the minimum, as evidence of the Taliban breaching the 'agreement'?
 
What would you consider the minimum, as evidence of the Taliban breaching the 'agreement'?
Claiming Major cities mainly. Once they began overthrowing the government they should have retaliated. Would have taken them a week to push them back. They only had 60.000 troop's remaining. With more targeted attacks on key leaders that thing ends right away.

Ultimately Taliban have killed more people then the escalation of conflict again would have so that's the path to take
 
Claiming Major cities
OK. That's the minimum?

Not the movements, or attacks etc as laid out in the agreement. But taking multiple major cities?

Is that really your position? Or is that your position because it exonerates Trump, and condemns Biden? (based on your belief of troops and ease of removal of the Taliban).

Claiming Major cities mainly. Once they began overthrowing the government they should have retaliated. Would have taken them a week to push them back. They only had 60.000 troop's remaining. With more targeted attacks on key leaders that thing ends right away.

Ultimately Taliban have killed more people then the escalation of conflict again would have so that's the path to take
I disagree with this, and I've explained why previously.
 
How are the 'Trump is anti-war' cohort feeling today btw?

He's open to using military force to seize land from Denmark and Panama. And wants to use economic force to make Canada a state of the US.

Very peaceful fellow. Much expantionist.
If you believe that you will believe anything.

You should also look at what question was asked and not just blindly trust news.com.au
 
OK. That's the minimum?

Not the movements, or attacks etc as laid out in the agreement. But taking multiple major cities?

Is that really your position? Or is that your position because it exonerates Trump, and condemns Biden? (based on your belief of troops and ease of removal of the Taliban).


I disagree with this, and I've explained why previously.
It was the main part of the agreement for restarting the war. The movement was absolutely nothing compared to what was the end result. As I said pens and stealing safe comparison

I'm aware that peace deals are not easy. They take nuance and movement. I do understand the difference though between a full takeover and walking 10km down the road
 

Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top