NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

How long before Musk & Trump have a major rift?

  • Under one month

  • Under six months

  • Under one year

  • Under two years

  • Before the term ends

  • Not happening, never!

  • Not until Musk is ready to seize the Presidency

Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

Last edited:
Stokey said:
What utter nonsense.
Click to expand...
Reporter: Can you assure the world that as you try to get control of Greenland and the Panama Canal, that you won't use military or economic coercion?

They just dont understand the word OR

I mean im pretty sure a 12 year old could listen to that press conference and understand he means he will use economic coercsion, but the lefties just wanna hear what they wanna hear
 
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
Reporter: Can you assure the world that as you try to get control of Greenland and the Panama Canal, that you won't use military or economic coercion?

They just dont understand the word OR

I mean im pretty sure a 12 year old could listen to that press conference and understand he means he will use economic coercsion, but the lefties just wanna hear what they wanna hear
Click to expand...

MSM news broadcasts tonight (which I hardly ever watch) all had the same biased take.
 
1736189555590.png

Medal of Freedom recipients. Looks like just a list of people they'd like to meet before they get kicked out of the White House.

"Who do you want to meet?"
"I want to meet that gorilla lady."
"Okay. Let's give her a medal."
"I've always wanted to meet Bono. He's so awesome."
"All right. We'll give him a medal."
"Hey, could I get some cooking tips from Jose?"
"Yeah. We'll give him a medal."

There was one award receipient I thought was worthy though. Denzel. Big couple of weeks for him too. Baptised the day before his 70th Birthday and then the Medal of Freedom.

 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
Reporter: Can you assure the world that as you try to get control of Greenland and the Panama Canal, that you won't use military or economic coercion?

They just dont understand the word OR

I mean im pretty sure a 12 year old could listen to that press conference and understand he means he will use economic coercsion, but the lefties just wanna hear what they wanna hear
Click to expand...

You are mistaken. Stokey isn't 12
 
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
Reporter: Can you assure the world that as you try to get control of Greenland and the Panama Canal, that you won't use military or economic coercion?

They just dont understand the word OR

I mean im pretty sure a 12 year old could listen to that press conference and understand he means he will use economic coercsion, but the lefties just wanna hear what they wanna hear
Click to expand...

There was the first clip with Trump which might have been a big ambiguous on the issue of military action against Panama but then he was asked about it again! There's nothing vague about this. Do the reading.

It's you who just wanna hear what you wanna hear.
 
First Mention of Greenland in press conference.

President-elect Trump announces 20 billion foreign investment to

- Donald Trump announced that DAMAC Properties, a major Middle East business leader, will be investing at least $20 billion in the United States, potentially doubling that amount, to support new data centers and cloud/AI infrastructure. - Trump said he will work to expedite regulatory reviews...
www.rev.com

Later mention of Greenland in press conference.

President-elect Trump announces 20 billion foreign investment to

- Donald Trump announced that DAMAC Properties, a major Middle East business leader, will be investing at least $20 billion in the United States, potentially doubling that amount, to support new data centers and cloud/AI infrastructure. - Trump said he will work to expedite regulatory reviews...
www.rev.com

Pretty clear to me. A press conference over an hour long during which he called up one of his people to speak about his efforts in the Middle East assisting in negotiations on releasing the hostages and the media tries to put a spin on his comments on Greenland. Colour me shocked.
 
Last edited:
LOL superb.

1736313522810-png.2199797
 
EasternTiger said:
Personally, I’d nuke the whole region and start again.
Click to expand...
I'm going to assume that no one in this thread responded to this. Because no one in this thread values you in any form.

I look forward to being proved wrong. I'd like for you to get the validation you so desperately crave.
In the same way when I watch cringe videos on Youtube part of me wishes the cringe loser gets some human connection. It's empathy. And I wish I had less of it.
 
bourbons said:
Geez they're all really bending the knee aren't they.

The damage Trump has done and will do that country is incalculable :(
Click to expand...
Everything they argued against...

Like, literally everything they implied was happening, and because it wasn't provable that it wasn't happening... It meant we need a revolution...

They're now 100% behind... because 'at least it's obvious'.


NO...
You oppose something because of what it is...
Not because you think it exists but can't demonstrate it.


No one watched Chis Hansen's To Catch a Predator and said 'If they'd just been blatantly open and honest, I'd have supported them!'.

It's the action not the deception.

But suddenly it's all about truth (while ignoring Trumps lack of truth).



They don't say "Why don't you take a seat, and explain your hypocrisy?".
They say, take a seat and explain your ****ing actions.

I beg for a single Trump supporter in this thread to argue with me that the implication of something is worse than the application of the same thing.


Chris Hansen GIF
 
Kurve said:
There was the first clip with Trump which might have been a big ambiguous on the issue of military action against Panama but then he was asked about it again! There's nothing vague about this. Do the reading.

It's you who just wanna hear what you wanna hear.
Click to expand...
Which one? Do you have a media link . Every single media report is about that first quote also remember
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
And Biden could ?

Both get wildly misquoted. Trump more then Biden but it’s much the same strategy.
Click to expand...

Yeah but that’s Bidens fault. He has a stutter and is very old.

Trump has no excuse. As such he is completely innocent.
 
GoEaglesGoSGIO I know you asked Kurve for this but I posted a link to the second discussion of Greenland from his press conference in #4,858. It contains the transcript and video clip side by side.

Anyway here's the transcript.

Speaker 7 (50:26):
Back on Greenland. Your position is clear, but have you directed your staff to take any specific actions to draw plans and can you elaborate again, you didn't rule out military coercion in-
Donald Trump (50:37):
Well, we need Greenland for national security purposes. I've been told that for a long time, long before I even ran. I mean, people have been talking about it for a long time. You have approximately 45,000 people there. People really don't even know if Denmark has any legal right to it, but if they do, they should give it up because we need it for national security. That's for the free world. I'm talking about protecting the free world. You don't even need binoculars. You look outside, you have China ships all over the place. You have Russian ships all over the place. We're not letting that happen. We're not letting it happen. And if Denmark wants to get to a conclusion, but nobody knows if they even have any right, title, or interest. The people are going to probably vote for independence or to come into the United States. But if they did do that, then I would tariff Denmark at a very high level.
Speaker 5 (51:34):
Have you asked your staff to draw plans for acquisition? Are you active-
Donald Trump (51:35):
No, we're not at that stage. I haven't even entered office yet.
 
Kurve said:
I already posted it.
Click to expand...
Kurve is one of the most honest, engaging, supportive and inclusive people most of us will ever know.
The time and effort they've put into creating and growing a community of people that can be at each others throats while within site rules, is incredible.
Kurve will never be appreciated for their invisible moderation that makes everyone feel heard and satisfied. Without being embarrassed.
Other admin/mods do it now, but Kurve stands out.

Yet still posters need to attack them through the lens of 'mod'.
They can't attack them for what's posted, what's explained, what's sourced, what's linked.
They can only attack by attributing positions to her that she does not, and has never had.

There are a number of admin/mods etc on this site who I will always respect and admire, who are hated by others. And I can understand their positions.
But the silly attacks on Kurve over the last few pages, are purely because she is viewed through the lens of being a 'BF Mod'.
Engage with her posts and her positions.
 
CM86 said:
Kurve is one of the most honest, engaging, supportive and inclusive people most of us will ever know.
The time and effort they've put into creating and growing a community of people that can be at each others throats while within site rules, is incredible.
Kurve will never be appreciated for their invisible moderation that makes everyone feel heard and satisfied. Without being embarrassed.
Other admin/mods do it now, but Kurve stands out.

Yet still posters need to attack them through the lens of 'mod'.
They can't attack them for what's posted, what's explained, what's sourced, what's linked.
They can only attack by attributing positions to her that she does not, and has never had.

There are a number of admin/mods etc on this site who I will always respect and admire, who are hated by others. And I can understand their positions.
But the silly attacks on Kurve over the last few pages, are purely because she is viewed through the lens of being a 'BF Mod'.
Engage with her posts and her positions.
Click to expand...

Thankyou :)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

Similar threads

HitTheNailOnTheHead
Conspiracy Theory You have more chance of winning US lotto than drowning and yet the Obama and the Clinton chefs have both apparently drowned. What is going on?
Replies
7
Views
370
Ghost Patrol
Ghost Patrol
Back
Top