NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

[Kurve]

Here is US Politics Pt 2

Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.

Take Note

Anti-trans commentary will be deleted and warnings issued, that includes mockery and trying to pass it off as a joke.

Play nice, please.

 

[Mofra]

Sounds like a charmer. Domestic violence by strangulation.

https://www.wfla.com/news/florida-man-who-got-jan-6-pardon-arrested-on-federal-gun-charge/

 

[Kurve]

Modern white supremacy looks a bit different; they're still deeply opposed to the 'other'. It's just the hierarchy of 'other' has changed, 'Jew' isn't at the top of it any more for many of them. Or they dislike 'Jews' but like 'Israel'.

Who's at the top then?

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Yes mate, I understand - thats why I said 'stuff the courts couldn't wave away', quoting your own terminology - you know, the thing you then bolded in a reply and accused me of strawmanning over?

I originally said this ...

What most have forgotten about what happened at the Capitol was that a lot of the evidence of fraud that was going to be heard that day got shut down and most objecting senators/congress reps dropped their objections to ratifying the result after the violence erupted. This was evidence that wasn't going to be able to be waved away like some courts later did when they blamed 'standing', or laches and it was evidence the Democrats had a vested interest in not being heard.

My point being the joint session wasn't subjected to the same rules as the courts and so the presentation of the evidence wouldn't be interrupted or shut down.

Which you then misrepresented as this.

The evidence was going to be presented that day! Stuff the courts couldn't wave away!!

Yes, about observers being made to stand 15 feet away when it should have been 10, yuge things of this nature.

A lot more than that actually. Must be your selective memory in operation again.

Wanna have a guess how many of those won cases alleged fraud?

If it's 0 then the media, twitter and Bigfooty SRP mantra "Trump lost 60 electoral fraud cases" was a complete concoction then wasn't it.

Seems your bar of proof of the 2024 result being illegitimate is hypocritically low though. Mumbling something like 'Trump said Elon's good with computers or something wasn't it?

 

[CM86]

Modern white supremacy looks a bit different; they're still deeply opposed to the 'other'. It's just the hierarchy of 'other' has changed, 'Jew' isn't at the top of it any more for many of them. Or they dislike 'Jews' but like 'Israel'.

It's more than that.

White supremacists support ethnostates.
So an African continent for all 'black' people.
A Jewish country for all Jews.
They support any aspect of segregation.

That doesn't mean they side with or support the survival of those people.

 

[bourbons]

You are forgetting ive answered the question multiple times. Fact you found these posts and not the ones I answered you in says alot

Uh huh

Answered so many time you can't provide a single link to any instance and put this to bed once and for all.

Come on mate, you're not fooling anyone surely you can see that

 

[CM86]

Don't forget, Trump supposedly won on the cost of living.

 

[Nothing]

Who's at the top then?

I suspect it's POC first. They're coming for my job types.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

rofl

Accusing leftists of having to 'scour the internet' while posting 3 altered videos of democrats not doing what Elon did is just chef's kiss

In what way do you allege the videos have been 'altered'?

Just on the comparison you keep making. Have we worked out where the rare, obscure getty's gif originally comes from yet or what organisation the people in it belong to?

 

[faible]

Who's at the top then?

Currently, the nebulous 'immigrants' I'd say.

The 'Jew' part was largely a product of the time and Hitler's personal views, what gets lost is that their general ideology was about the 'other' and it's who the other was that's changed somewhat. They did a fair job of slaughtering Roma (gypsies) during their reign of terror.

Whilst a fair chunk of the 1920's '25 point plan' was thrown out over time, this section gives a pretty good insight in to their views not just being directed at Jews;

4. Only those who are our fellow countrymen can become citizens. Only those who have German blood, regardless of creed, can be our countrymen. Hence no Jew can be a countryman.

5. Those who are not citizens must live in Germany as foreigners and must be subject to the law of aliens.

6. The right to choose the government and determine the laws of the State shall belong only to citizens. We therefore demand that no public office, of whatever nature, whether in the central government, the province, or the municipality, shall be held by anyone who is not a citizen.

7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. If it should not be possible to feed the whole population, then aliens (non-citizens) must be expelled from the Reich.

8. Any further immigration of non-Germans must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately.

Point 8 is particularly topical given what's going on in the US right now.

 

[CM86]

Just on the comparison you keep making. Have we worked out where the rare, obscure getty's gif originally comes from yet or what organisation the people in it belong to?

Please tell me.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

 

[CM86]

Who's at the top then?

The easiest target, and one of the smallest minority groups. One of the most divisive.
Transgender.

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.​

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.​

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.​

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me. —Martin Niemöller​

​

​

​

 

[FireKrakouer]

Oh we're going to actually listen to science for once? That's quite the about face, ma'am.

Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic

Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male

www.scientificamerican.com

Now that we're on the same page regarding you and GP falling for a silly tweet, yes, I will acknowledge that biological sex is not an XX/XY thing in 100% of cases. But just as "humans are bipeds" is considered a true statement despite there being people out there who don't have two legs, "there are two biological sexes" is also the case outside of rare abnormalities. Don't blame me, blame biology!

 

[bourbons]

Just another goalpost shift as always. Keep to a subject please. Its bloody hard when you change topic every 15 seconds

You ****ed up. Anyone reading that sequence of posts can see it mate.

Its ok, it happens ¯\(ツ)/¯

 

[bourbons]

He has autism and aspies and he was probably realised how silly this looks, so he tried again and failed.

Don't make me feel sorry for him because between him and Trump, their power is almost too big to wrap my head around and I don't think we've seen anything like it before.

They do everything big including big risks so if they fail, they'll probably take everybody down with them.

It looks fine to me?

Kinda the same as everyone else I've seen do the "my heart goes out" thing does it.

 

[bourbons]

Like you and your cronies thinking musk is a Nazi?

Sure, go for your life.

Notice how I'm not accusing you of having MDS but rather am backing my position and thoughts on it with factual data points?

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

It looks fine to me?

Kinda the same as everyone else I've seen do the "my heart goes out" thing does it.

LOL Not quite. Here's Tim doing the "my heart goes out" thing.

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

Cutting finding by billions is the exact opposite way to bridge that gap though.

That's also assuming that dollars are the sole reason for scientific advancement, which I personally disagree with (hence the second article that touches on the link between productivity and standard of living).

Just on this, where does Dr Fauci appear in all of this? Dont forget he was taking US govt funding to do research in China itself.... Would you consider this somewhat part to blame for the removal of funding like this? Why is Dr Fauci allowed to send US govt funding and spend it on research inside China for?

Surely based on this he should be investigated no?

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

LOL Not quite. Here's Tim doing the "my heart goes out" thing.

Best to ignore

One day they will argue politics... one day

 

[CM86]

Just on this, where does Dr Fauci appear in all of this? Dont forget he was taking US govt funding to do research in China itself.... Would you consider this somewhat part to blame for the removal of funding like this? Why is Dr Fauci allowed to send US govt funding and spend it on research inside China for?

Surely based on this he should be investigated no?

Should Dr Fauci have imported the contagions into the US to be studied, instead?


Should the research be done where the things are found, or should they be transported globally for individual research?

 

[CM86]

Best to ignore

One day they will argue politics... one day

...

Logging off soon so don't have time for another gnat straining exercise right now.

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

Damn Big Pharma!

Except Merck (who make Ivermectin) who are apparently not part of Big Pharma. Somehow.

Why do you think Big Pharma is a long term event? You think the industry of 1975 is comparable to that of 2025?

Big Pharma came when Bill Clinton came really. Remember he was the person who basically created the NIH. Before he came along it was a nothing organisation. He then started funding it and did so outside of the US interests.

In the end Ivermectin is also a good example of what the difference is. Makers of Ivermectin never had govt protections, the inventor never had doubts on the product he made and they did rigirous testing and design work which has rarely been seen since. They were EXTREMELY open on what it was, how it was made and were nothing but transparent from the beginning.

Nowadays.... nope. Just trust the govt....

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

Should Dr Fauci have imported the contagions into the US to be studied, instead?


Should the research be done where the things are found, or should they be transported globally for individual research?

Yes. Thats a absolute no brainer.

They should be transported to the state whose doing the funding as opposed to left in the hands of a foreign state who you have a poor relationship with

Those 2 questions answer themselves. Not sure why you asked them

 

[CM86]

Yes. Thats a absolute no brainer.

They should be transported to the state whose doing the funding as opposed to left in the hands of a foreign state who you have a poor relationship with

Those 2 questions answer themselves. Not sure why you asked them

I'm sorry.

Your position is that countries should import contagions?

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

January 3, 2021
9:24 a.m.—United States Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund made his first request for D.C. National Guard to House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving: Irving told Sund he doesn't "like the optics of that" and directed Sund to consult with Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger. Afterwards, Irving immediately called Stenger to advise him of Sund’s request, insisting they come up with another plan. Irving told Stenger that he will “never get this by Pelosi.”

11:53 a.m.—Sund brought the D.C. National Guard request to Stenger. Stenger asked Sund if he could unofficially inquire with Walker about what assistance the National Guard could provide if they were needed on January 6.

Around Noon—Sund met U.S. Capitol Police head of Protective Services Bureau Sean Gallagher at USCP headquarters. Gallagher advised Sund that he had received a call from Carol Corbin, program director at the Department of Defense, who wanted to know if they would be requesting the National Guard. After having his request denied by Irving and Stenger, Sund asked Gallagher to tell Corbin, “Thank you, but at this time we will not be requesting the National Guard.”

Later in the day—Sund contacted both Irving and Stenger and told them about the call from Corbin and the inquiry from the Defense Department. Sund said that based on their instruction to him, he asked Gallagher to inform Corbin that the USCP would not be requesting the National Guard and reiterated that he was still planning to call Walker that evening to advise him of the outcome.

5:30 p.m.—Meeting with President Trump at the White House about Iran: Attendees include Milley, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and Acting Secretary of Defense Miller. In his interview with the January 6 Select Committee, Milley said he believed White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, Defense Department Chief of Staff Kash Patel, and White House General Counsel Pat Cipollone also attended the meeting.

During the meeting, President Trump said, "There's going to be a large amount of protesters here on the 6th, make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it's a safe event." He continued: "I don't care if you use Guard, or Soldiers, active duty Soldiers, do whatever you have to do. Just make sure it's safe."

Timeline of Events Surrounding J6 D.C. National Guard Deployment Shows Politically Motivated Decisions

As Kamala Harris and Democrats continue to use January 6 as a campaign issue, it is important to recall those responsible for preventing the National Guard from protecting the Capitol.

substack.com

Looks like a clear case of failure to carry out a direct order to me.