NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

How long before Musk & Trump have a major rift?

  • Under one month

  • Under six months

  • Under one year

  • Under two years

  • Before the term ends

  • Not happening, never!

  • Not until Musk is ready to seize the Presidency

Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

Last edited:
Kurve said:
Most white supremacists are Jew hating antisemites, so he gets off the hook a bit there. That doesn't mean he's not a white supremacist on some level and that he'll break the mould.
Click to expand...

Modern white supremacy looks a bit different; they're still deeply opposed to the 'other'. It's just the hierarchy of 'other' has changed, 'Jew' isn't at the top of it any more for many of them. Or they dislike 'Jews' but like 'Israel'.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

faible said:
Modern white supremacy looks a bit different; they're still deeply opposed to the 'other'. It's just the hierarchy of 'other' has changed, 'Jew' isn't at the top of it any more for many of them. Or they dislike 'Jews' but like 'Israel'.
Click to expand...

Who's at the top then?
 
bourbons said:
Yes mate, I understand - thats why I said 'stuff the courts couldn't wave away', quoting your own terminology - you know, the thing you then bolded in a reply and accused me of strawmanning over? :drunk:
Click to expand...


I originally said this ...

HitTheNailOnTheHead said:
What most have forgotten about what happened at the Capitol was that a lot of the evidence of fraud that was going to be heard that day got shut down and most objecting senators/congress reps dropped their objections to ratifying the result after the violence erupted. This was evidence that wasn't going to be able to be waved away like some courts later did when they blamed 'standing', or laches and it was evidence the Democrats had a vested interest in not being heard.
Click to expand...

My point being the joint session wasn't subjected to the same rules as the courts and so the presentation of the evidence wouldn't be interrupted or shut down.

Which you then misrepresented as this.

bourbons said:
The evidence was going to be presented that day! Stuff the courts couldn't wave away!!
Click to expand...


bourbons said:
Yes, about observers being made to stand 15 feet away when it should have been 10, yuge things of this nature.
Click to expand...

A lot more than that actually. Must be your selective memory in operation again.

bourbons said:
Wanna have a guess how many of those won cases alleged fraud?
Click to expand...

If it's 0 then the media, twitter and Bigfooty SRP mantra "Trump lost 60 electoral fraud cases" was a complete concoction then wasn't it.

Seems your bar of proof of the 2024 result being illegitimate is hypocritically low though. Mumbling something like 'Trump said Elon's good with computers or something wasn't it?

🤣 :$ 🥴
 
faible said:
Modern white supremacy looks a bit different; they're still deeply opposed to the 'other'. It's just the hierarchy of 'other' has changed, 'Jew' isn't at the top of it any more for many of them. Or they dislike 'Jews' but like 'Israel'.
Click to expand...
It's more than that.

White supremacists support ethnostates.
So an African continent for all 'black' people.
A Jewish country for all Jews.
They support any aspect of segregation.

That doesn't mean they side with or support the survival of those people.
 
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
You are forgetting ive answered the question multiple times. Fact you found these posts and not the ones I answered you in says alot
Click to expand...
Uh huh :tearsofjoy:

Answered so many time you can't provide a single link to any instance and put this to bed once and for all.

Come on mate, you're not fooling anyone surely you can see that :drunk:
 
bourbons said:
rofl

Accusing leftists of having to 'scour the internet' while posting 3 altered videos of democrats not doing what Elon did is just chef's kiss
Click to expand...

In what way do you allege the videos have been 'altered'?

Just on the comparison you keep making. Have we worked out where the rare, obscure getty's gif originally comes from yet or what organisation the people in it belong to?
 
Kurve said:
Who's at the top then?
Click to expand...

Currently, the nebulous 'immigrants' I'd say.

The 'Jew' part was largely a product of the time and Hitler's personal views, what gets lost is that their general ideology was about the 'other' and it's who the other was that's changed somewhat. They did a fair job of slaughtering Roma (gypsies) during their reign of terror.

Whilst a fair chunk of the 1920's '25 point plan' was thrown out over time, this section gives a pretty good insight in to their views not just being directed at Jews;

4. Only those who are our fellow countrymen can become citizens. Only those who have German blood, regardless of creed, can be our countrymen. Hence no Jew can be a countryman.

5. Those who are not citizens must live in Germany as foreigners and must be subject to the law of aliens.

6. The right to choose the government and determine the laws of the State shall belong only to citizens. We therefore demand that no public office, of whatever nature, whether in the central government, the province, or the municipality, shall be held by anyone who is not a citizen.

7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. If it should not be possible to feed the whole population, then aliens (non-citizens) must be expelled from the Reich.

8. Any further immigration of non-Germans must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately.
Click to expand...

Point 8 is particularly topical given what's going on in the US right now.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Kurve said:
Who's at the top then?
Click to expand...
The easiest target, and one of the smallest minority groups. One of the most divisive.
Transgender.

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.​
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.​
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.​
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me. —Martin Niemöller​
​
​
​
1737607101488.png
 
Mofra said:
Oh we're going to actually listen to science for once? That's quite the about face, ma'am.

www.scientificamerican.com

Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic

Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male
www.scientificamerican.com www.scientificamerican.com
Click to expand...
sky-sky_.gif

Now that we're on the same page regarding you and GP falling for a silly tweet, yes, I will acknowledge that biological sex is not an XX/XY thing in 100% of cases. But just as "humans are bipeds" is considered a true statement despite there being people out there who don't have two legs, "there are two biological sexes" is also the case outside of rare abnormalities. Don't blame me, blame biology!
 
Kurve said:
He has autism and aspies and he was probably realised how silly this looks, so he tried again and failed.

Don't make me feel sorry for him because between him and Trump, their power is almost too big to wrap my head around and I don't think we've seen anything like it before.

They do everything big including big risks so if they fail, they'll probably take everybody down with them.

:bomb::bomb:
Click to expand...
It looks fine to me?

Kinda the same as everyone else I've seen do the "my heart goes out" thing does it.
 
Mofra said:
Cutting finding by billions is the exact opposite way to bridge that gap though.

That's also assuming that dollars are the sole reason for scientific advancement, which I personally disagree with (hence the second article that touches on the link between productivity and standard of living).
Click to expand...
Just on this, where does Dr Fauci appear in all of this? Dont forget he was taking US govt funding to do research in China itself.... Would you consider this somewhat part to blame for the removal of funding like this? Why is Dr Fauci allowed to send US govt funding and spend it on research inside China for?

Surely based on this he should be investigated no?
 
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
Just on this, where does Dr Fauci appear in all of this? Dont forget he was taking US govt funding to do research in China itself.... Would you consider this somewhat part to blame for the removal of funding like this? Why is Dr Fauci allowed to send US govt funding and spend it on research inside China for?

Surely based on this he should be investigated no?
Click to expand...
Should Dr Fauci have imported the contagions into the US to be studied, instead?


Should the research be done where the things are found, or should they be transported globally for individual research?
 
Mofra said:
Damn Big Pharma!

Except Merck (who make Ivermectin) who are apparently not part of Big Pharma. Somehow.
Click to expand...
Why do you think Big Pharma is a long term event? You think the industry of 1975 is comparable to that of 2025?

Big Pharma came when Bill Clinton came really. Remember he was the person who basically created the NIH. Before he came along it was a nothing organisation. He then started funding it and did so outside of the US interests.

In the end Ivermectin is also a good example of what the difference is. Makers of Ivermectin never had govt protections, the inventor never had doubts on the product he made and they did rigirous testing and design work which has rarely been seen since. They were EXTREMELY open on what it was, how it was made and were nothing but transparent from the beginning.

Nowadays.... nope. Just trust the govt....
 
CM86 said:
Should Dr Fauci have imported the contagions into the US to be studied, instead?


Should the research be done where the things are found, or should they be transported globally for individual research?
Click to expand...
Yes. Thats a absolute no brainer.

They should be transported to the state whose doing the funding as opposed to left in the hands of a foreign state who you have a poor relationship with

Those 2 questions answer themselves. Not sure why you asked them
 

Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

Similar threads

HitTheNailOnTheHead
Conspiracy Theory You have more chance of winning US lotto than drowning and yet the Obama and the Clinton chefs have both apparently drowned. What is going on?
Replies
7
Views
367
Ghost Patrol
Ghost Patrol
Back
Top