NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

How long before Musk & Trump have a major rift?

  • Under one month

  • Under six months

  • Under one year

  • Under two years

  • Before the term ends

  • Not happening, never!

  • Not until Musk is ready to seize the Presidency


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

Last edited:
Yes. Thats a absolute no brainer.

They should be transported to the state whose doing the funding as opposed to left in the hands of a foreign state who you have a poor relationship with

Those 2 questions answer themselves. Not sure why you asked them
I'm sorry.

Your position is that countries should import contagions?
 
January 3, 2021
9:24 a.m.—United States Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund made his first request for D.C. National Guard to House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving: Irving told Sund he doesn't "like the optics of that" and directed Sund to consult with Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger. Afterwards, Irving immediately called Stenger to advise him of Sund’s request, insisting they come up with another plan. Irving told Stenger that he will “never get this by Pelosi.”

11:53 a.m.—Sund brought the D.C. National Guard request to Stenger. Stenger asked Sund if he could unofficially inquire with Walker about what assistance the National Guard could provide if they were needed on January 6.

Around Noon—Sund met U.S. Capitol Police head of Protective Services Bureau Sean Gallagher at USCP headquarters. Gallagher advised Sund that he had received a call from Carol Corbin, program director at the Department of Defense, who wanted to know if they would be requesting the National Guard. After having his request denied by Irving and Stenger, Sund asked Gallagher to tell Corbin, “Thank you, but at this time we will not be requesting the National Guard.”

Later in the day—Sund contacted both Irving and Stenger and told them about the call from Corbin and the inquiry from the Defense Department. Sund said that based on their instruction to him, he asked Gallagher to inform Corbin that the USCP would not be requesting the National Guard and reiterated that he was still planning to call Walker that evening to advise him of the outcome.

5:30 p.m.—Meeting with President Trump at the White House about Iran: Attendees include Milley, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and Acting Secretary of Defense Miller. In his interview with the January 6 Select Committee, Milley said he believed White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, Defense Department Chief of Staff Kash Patel, and White House General Counsel Pat Cipollone also attended the meeting.

During the meeting, President Trump said, "There's going to be a large amount of protesters here on the 6th, make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it's a safe event." He continued: "I don't care if you use Guard, or Soldiers, active duty Soldiers, do whatever you have to do. Just make sure it's safe."

Looks like a clear case of failure to carry out a direct order to me.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

January 3, 2021
9:24 a.m.—United States Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund made his first request for D.C. National Guard to House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving: Irving told Sund he doesn't "like the optics of that" and directed Sund to consult with Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger. Afterwards, Irving immediately called Stenger to advise him of Sund’s request, insisting they come up with another plan. Irving told Stenger that he will “never get this by Pelosi.”

11:53 a.m.—Sund brought the D.C. National Guard request to Stenger. Stenger asked Sund if he could unofficially inquire with Walker about what assistance the National Guard could provide if they were needed on January 6.

Around Noon—Sund met U.S. Capitol Police head of Protective Services Bureau Sean Gallagher at USCP headquarters. Gallagher advised Sund that he had received a call from Carol Corbin, program director at the Department of Defense, who wanted to know if they would be requesting the National Guard. After having his request denied by Irving and Stenger, Sund asked Gallagher to tell Corbin, “Thank you, but at this time we will not be requesting the National Guard.”

Later in the day—Sund contacted both Irving and Stenger and told them about the call from Corbin and the inquiry from the Defense Department. Sund said that based on their instruction to him, he asked Gallagher to inform Corbin that the USCP would not be requesting the National Guard and reiterated that he was still planning to call Walker that evening to advise him of the outcome.

5:30 p.m.—Meeting with President Trump at the White House about Iran: Attendees include Milley, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and Acting Secretary of Defense Miller. In his interview with the January 6 Select Committee, Milley said he believed White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, Defense Department Chief of Staff Kash Patel, and White House General Counsel Pat Cipollone also attended the meeting.

During the meeting, President Trump said, "There's going to be a large amount of protesters here on the 6th, make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it's a safe event." He continued: "I don't care if you use Guard, or Soldiers, active duty Soldiers, do whatever you have to do. Just make sure it's safe."

Looks like a clear case of failure to carry out a direct order to me.
At 2:13 p.m., rioters first gained entry to the interior of the Capitol after smashing windows on the Senate wing near S139.

Trump tweeted this at 2:24 p.m.


1737608871490.png
 
At 12:53 p.m., eighteen minutes before Trump's speech ended, rioters overran police on the west perimeter of restricted Capitol grounds.

At 2:13 p.m., rioters first gained entry to the interior of the Capitol after smashing windows on the Senate wing near S139.

At 2:24 p.m. Trump tweeted this.

1737609610341.png
 
View attachment 2209870

Now that we're on the same page regarding you and GP falling for a silly tweet, yes, I will acknowledge that biological sex is not an XX/XY thing in 100% of cases. But just as "humans are bipeds" is considered a true statement despite there being people out there who don't have two legs, "there are two biological sexes" is also the case outside of rare abnormalities. Don't blame me, blame biology!
Hey, I'm just providing sources little lady. I for one applaud Trump's inadvertent admission that he is in fact the first transgender President in US history.

Your fellow Trump fans might exclude you if you start talking science though. Be careful mate.
 
I originally said this ...



My point being the joint session wasn't subjected to the same rules as the courts and so the presentation of the evidence wouldn't be interrupted or shut down.

Which you then misrepresented as this.
Misrepresented? :drunk:

You: This was evidence that wasn't going to be able to be waved away like some courts later did when they blamed 'standing', or laches
Me: Stuff the courts couldn't wave away!

Soz I'm really not seeing the difference, talk about splitting hairs.

A lot more than that actually. Must be your selective memory in operation again.
Well considering I just proved your last claim of my selective memory wrong you'll probably need to substantiate this, post up the court case wins you're talking about please.

If it's 0 then the media, twitter and Bigfooty SRP mantra "Trump lost 60 electoral fraud cases" was a complete concoction then wasn't it.
Ha, you know you're going well when you have to retreat to semantics of this degree.

Seems your bar of proof of the 2024 result being illegitimate is hypocritically low though. Mumbling something like 'Trump said Elon's good with computers or something wasn't it?
Approaching Eagles levels of comprehension.

Go back and read that post again. I don't think the '24 election was illegitimate, I was musing about the tizzy you'd all be in if Biden had said that about a billionaire oligarch supporter in '20.
 
Last edited:
In what way do you allege the videos have been 'altered'?
Each video has the original audio muted or replaced by nonsense.

Why do that I wonder? Does the original audio offer some context that was a bit problematic for the narrative being attempted? :think:

Just on the comparison you keep making. Have we worked out where the rare, obscure getty's gif originally comes from yet or what organisation the people in it belong to?
Sounds like you have? Unsure why it matters, but don't keep us in suspense!

Smooth move ignoring the first part of my post and Elon's previous "my heart goes out", by the way :tearsofjoy:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Hey, I'm just providing sources little lady. I for one applaud Trump's inadvertent admission that he is in fact the first transgender President in US history.

Your fellow Trump fans might exclude you if you start talking science though. Be careful mate.
Little lady!? I'll have you know I was one of the XY embryos that started growing a pecker at 6 weeks in (the unfortunate fact that it didn't continue to grow in size after my birth is neither here nor there).

I actually agree with the progressive view that biological sex and gender can be separate things, with the latter being more complex and subjective. So let's not start trying to argue that the former is also some subjective spectrum just because you found a blog mentioning a sheila who ate her twin brother in the womb or whatever and gained additional chromosomes. Butchering the definitions of scientific terms won't help achieve social progress!
 
Little lady!? I'll have you know I was one of the XY embryos that started growing a pecker at 6 weeks in (the unfortunate fact that it didn't continue to grow in size after my birth is neither here nor there).

I actually agree with the progressive view that biological sex and gender can be separate things, with the latter being more complex and subjective. So let's not start trying to argue that the former is also some subjective spectrum just because you found a blog mentioning a sheila who ate her twin brother in the womb or whatever and gained additional chromosomes. Butchering the definitions of scientific terms won't help achieve social progress!
Sorry mate, going to have to defer to the medical professional on this one

1737614622751.png
 
It's not on behalf of China. It's where the pathogens are located.

So you agree now, that you shouldn't import pathogens?
It was on behalf of China… if it was a threat then why didn’t China investigate it themselves?

Perhaps if they are unwilling to provide this they should have a travel ban?

Why is it US responsibility to investigate pathogens in China for ?
 
How long until Trump declassifies the Epstein files?

Any reason he hasn't done it yet?
Probably the same reason they haven't been released before.

No pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell from Trump or Biden.Got 20yrs for child sex trafficking,not much prison time for the people she trafficked the children to.
Keeps quiet she stays alive.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

Back
Top