"Value" of Pick 16

Remove this Banner Ad

Stats there are pointless. If anything Schulz does well to have same goal average with less possesions. Also Schulz is second fiddle to Richo, where as Perrie is one of 6 headless chooks in the Adelaide forward line. Also in the bottom team. Schulz would be capable of 40+ in a side with a decent midfield and some good delivery, very underrated.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Stats there are pointless. If anything Schulz does well to have same goal average with less possesions. Also Schulz is second fiddle to Richo, where as Perrie is one of 6 headless chooks in the Adelaide forward line. Also in the bottom team. Schulz would be capable of 40+ in a side with a decent midfield and some good delivery, very underrated.
All potential....so you think he is worth a top 20 pick...Ports First???
 
James Kelly was a pick 17 after that got shopped through about five clubs in the 2001 draft. He finally delivered this year after some serious hills and dales.

16 is a good pick to give away when the likes of burton (98), Scott Thompson (00), Ladson (01) have gone there, and we still waiting to decide how much guys like richard douglas and mitch brown in the last couple of years will do with their careers
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Maybe it shows what the Port recruiting staff feel of the depth of this years youngsters???

They dont need to build for the future. They need a few ready made players
 
The guy has talent, he is just lazy. Every single preseason so far he ends up in the rehab group every second week with some soft injury and just gives the impression that he doesnt care. This could be changed at Port as he will know its his last chance and he might become a decent player. Pick 16 looks over the odds, but i cant see Richmond accepting 33 as we may not even use it and he is under contract. Probably worth around 25 or so.
 
Not worth 16 alone but perhaps is with the tigers throwing in their early 3rd rounder... He certainly isn't a lost cause and most tigers supporters will be pretty scared to see what he could do at port.

He also has the worst player communication in history with richo - they run to and contest the same ball in the forward line a shocking amount of times... not sure who's fault this is but I am sure that he would be better with a decent coaching staff behind him.
 
Not worth 16 alone but perhaps is with the tigers throwing in their early 3rd rounder... He certainly isn't a lost cause and most tigers supporters will be pretty scared to see what he could do at port.

He also has the worst player communication in history with richo - they run to and contest the same ball in the forward line a shocking amount of times... not sure who's fault this is but I am sure that he would be better with a decent coaching staff behind him.
Sounds like he will fit in with Ebert and Motlop....three Port players run into each other in the middle of the 50...classic...
 
Sounds like he will fit in with Ebert and Motlop....three Port players run into each other in the middle of the 50...classic...

Well it would be hard not to run into Big Head!
 
Stats there are pointless. If anything Schulz does well to have same goal average with less possesions. Also Schulz is second fiddle to Richo, where as Perrie is one of 6 headless chooks in the Adelaide forward line. Also in the bottom team. Schulz would be capable of 40+ in a side with a decent midfield and some good delivery, very underrated.

yeah definately agree, he is a very talented player who needs a bit of luck, can have some real dominating games
 

Remove this Banner Ad

"Value" of Pick 16

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top