- Thread starter
- #101
Koch already trying to fend off a push for more member elected positions
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Koch already trying to fend off a push for more member elected positions
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Lol ofcourse he isKoch already trying to fend off a push for more member elected positions
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
George in, Snowden out. Yay.
Cardone extended another three years. Boo.
Koch laying down the law re member elected positions. Double boo.
Stinkley doesn’t even grace the agm with his presence. What a campaigner.
We need to get rid of this campaigner asapKoch laying down the law re member elected positions. Double boo.
Has anyone asked any good questions to board, yet?
Missed the Cardone for another 3 years. OUCH.George in, Snowden out. Yay.
Cardone extended another three years. Boo.
Koch laying down the law re member elected positions. Double boo.
Stinkley doesn’t even grace the agm with his presence. What a campaigner.
I haven't been given firm numbers but was told it wasn't close.
Ahhh, so they are buried for a reason.
And was denied.I don't think the numbers have been buried at all. It wouldn't be usual practice to release them. I believe Warren actually requested they be released prior to him winning.
Best not to bring that to anyone's attention.I haven't been given firm numbers but was told it wasn't close.
Not surprised, as they would have stated it at the Agm like they did with the Tredders vote. Thanks for the info.I haven't been given firm numbers but was told it wasn't close.
I don't think the numbers have been buried at all. It wouldn't be usual practice to release them. I believe Warren actually requested they be released prior to him winning.
Pretty certain it was actually Greg Boulton who spoke to one of the head honchos at the club (my best guess is Richo or Koch) and said the publicity of the vote demanded that there be transparency of vote numbers.
I believe both candidates supported that notion.
Strange concept for a football club of not allowing capable representatives to run for board positions that have a football background.It’s ironic, the club doesn’t offer board seats to former players, forces them via member elect, then says members a full member controlled board would only vote former players!
No footy members nominating don’t have a chance against former players
Yeah I reckon in the 20 odd years I've been voting, the only time they published the numbers was last year.Pretty certain it was actually Greg Boulton who spoke to one of the head honchos at the club (my best guess is Richo or Koch) and said the publicity of the vote demanded that there be transparency of vote numbers.
I believe both candidates supported that notion.