Current WAR CRIMES Israel - * ICC issues warrants for Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu & Yoav Gallant & for Hamas's Mohammed Deif

Remove this Banner Ad

The ICC has also issued a warrant for Hamas leader Mohammed Deif, who Israel says they have killed.

According to the ICC, the chamber “found reasonable grounds to believe” that Deif was “responsible for the crimes against humanity of murder; extermination; torture; and rape and other form of sexual violence; as well as the war crimes of murder, cruel treatment, torture; taking hostages; outrages upon personal dignity; and rape and other form of sexual violence”.

It also said there were reasonable grounds to believe the crimes against humanity were “part of a widespread and systematic attack directed by Hamas and other armed groups against the civilian population of Israel”.

For Netanyahu and Gallant, who was replaced as defence minister earlier this month, the chamber “found reasonable grounds to believe” that they “each bear criminal responsibility for the following crimes as co-perpetrators for committing the acts jointly with others: the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts”.

It also found reasonable grounds to believe that “each bear criminal responsibility as civilian superiors for the war crime of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population”.




INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT - Elements of Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes

 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

People far more learned than you or I have called it a Genocide. The ICJ has a case before them investigating it as a Genocide.

Let's not pretend it's not a realistic chance of being an attempted Genocide.

You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to know that it’s not a genocide though.

The ICJ said that it was "plausible" that there could be a genocide, which I agree could be plausible/possible if Israel were playing a very long and stealthy genocide game.

But I always thought that the likelihood of this would be slim to none and unless this ceasefire is yet another link in Israel's long-term genocide plan, then the perennial use of the word is frankly offensive and diminishes the gravitas of the word itself.
 
You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to know that it’s not a genocide though.

:)

The ICJ said that it was "plausible" that there could be a genocide

You're welcome to believe otherwise. But that's not an authoritative belief, nor does it dismiss the reality that a number of organisations do believe it's plausibly an attempted genocide.

They don't, and will never, all look the same as Germany in the 40s.
 
Interesting to see if there is a revolt against Hamas in Gaza post war. At the end of the day Hamas has brought nothing but death & destruction to Gazam, wants to establish a caliphate, will never accept a two state solution.

IF Hamas were to stay in power post war history shows another terrorist attack is probable once they're able to rebuild and smuggle in more weapons from their Iranian sponsors. Bearing in mind that there was an ongoing truce agreed between Israel & Hamas on Aug 7 2022 that was shattered in the worst possible way on Oct 7 2023.
 
:)



You're welcome to believe otherwise. But that's not an authoritative belief, nor does it dismiss the reality that a number of organisations do believe it's plausibly an attempted genocide.

They don't, and will never, all look the same as Germany in the 40s.

Simply put until anything is proven to a legal standard Israel are innocent.
 
Interesting to see if there is a revolt against Hamas in Gaza post war. At the end of the day Hamas has brought nothing but death & destruction to Gazam, wants to establish a caliphate, will never accept a two state solution.

IF Hamas were to stay in power post war history shows another terrorist attack is probable once they're able to rebuild and smuggle in more weapons from their Iranian sponsors. Bearing in mind that there was an ongoing truce agreed between Israel & Hamas on Aug 7 2022 that was shattered in the worst possible way on Oct 7 2023.

Just by watching videos out of Gaza, there's still enough weaponry for them to do another October 7 if I don't think Israel will get caught out like that again.

If Iran is neutered and the regime toppled, that might offer more security for Israel.

 
Just by watching videos out of Gaza, there's still enough weaponry for them to do another October 7 if I don't think Israel will get caught out like that again.

If Iran is neutered and the regime toppled, that might offer more security for Israel.


Blinken's comments the other day on how it might look were pretty extensive, will be interesting to see how close they are to the final agreement (assuming we get there).
 
Blinken's comments the other day on how it might look were pretty extensive, will be interesting to see how close they are to the final agreement (assuming we get there).

In his interview with Amanpour?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The ICJ said that it was "plausible" that there could be a genocide, which I agree could be plausible/possible if Israel were playing a very long and stealthy genocide game.
The ICJ didn't say that. It's a misreporting, it's been cleared up by Judge Donahue a long time ago, but it keeps coming up again and again.

“The court test for deciding whether to impose measures uses the idea of plausibility, but the test is the plausibility of the rights that are asserted by the applicant, in this case South Africa, so the court decided that the Palestinians had a plausible right to be protected from genocide, and that South Africa had the right to present that claim in the court" - Judge Donahue.

They didn't find it was plausible that there is a genocide. If the ICJ had a really good reason to believe there was an ongoing genocide, you would imagine their provisional measures would have been a lot stronger than they were. We don't really know what they think with regards to the case though.
 
Last edited:
Rubio who I think is giving indications of toppling the regime of Iran.

"I don't know of any nation in which there is a bigger difference between the people and the people who govern them than in Iran...In no way are the clerics representative of the people... its history and contributions it’s made to humanity."

"What can not be allowed under any circumstances is a nuclear armed Iran, what can not be allowed under any circumstances is an Iran that has resources and capability to restart and continue their sponsorship of terrorism, what can not be allowed under any circumstances is an Iran with a military capability of threatening and destabilising it's neighbours ... "

 
Rubio who I think is giving indications of toppling the regime of Iran.

"I don't know of any nation in which there is a bigger difference between the people and the people who govern them than in Iran...In no way are the clerics representative of the people... its history and contributions it’s made to humanity."

"What can not be allowed under any circumstances is a nuclear armed Iran, what can not be allowed under any circumstances is an Iran that has resources and capability to restart and continue their sponsorship of terrorism, what can not be allowed under any circumstances is an Iran with a military capability of threatening and destabilising it's neighbours ... "



Ironically, it was Trump who withdrew from the nuclear deal with Iran during his last presidency.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current WAR CRIMES Israel - * ICC issues warrants for Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu & Yoav Gallant & for Hamas's Mohammed Deif

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top