We Are Essendon | Round 2, 2023
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Agreed. It’s a savage attack on the senses.
As distinct to a savage attack on the ball.
Stat in the paper today. GWS as a team covered 242 kms. Essendon 147kms.
That sums it up I reckon. Unbelievable! How is that even possible!!! All our players (on average) more than 1km less than their opponent EVERY QUARTER.
This is wrong and has been proven wrong many times.
We were shit but we did run aro u nd the same as GWS (we were the two lowest teams as well)
Incorrect stat? Was front and centre on the back of the Australian.This is wrong and has been proven wrong many times.
We were shit but we did run aro u nd the same as GWS (we were the two lowest teams as well)
That stat has been proven to be false. Our GPS malfunctioned for a period. If the papers are still quoting that stat they are doing a very bad job of basic research.Agreed. It’s a savage attack on the senses.
As distinct to a savage attack on the ball.
Stat in the paper today. GWS as a team covered 242 kms. Essendon 147kms.
That sums it up I reckon. Unbelievable! How is that even possible!!! All our players (on average) more than 1km less than their opponent EVERY QUARTER.
That's unlike Murdoch's papers to be publishing sensationalist bullshit. Completely out of characterIncorrect stat? Was front and centre on the back of the Australian.
But thank god. Though the terrifying part is that it looked to the naked eye like it was probably true.
Weekly Roast/Toast based on the general feeling around the club as it evolves week-by-week.
#wooshaout
Also here
https://www.facebook.com/weareessington/
I'm pleased that the numbers were corrected and no longer look so pathetic, but the fact that a lot of us looked at those numbers and didn't even debate them for a second speaks volumes.That stat has been proven to be false. Our GPS malfunctioned for a period. If the papers are still quoting that stat they are doing a very bad job of basic research.
Mind you, it doesn't change the fact that we still stunk it up about as much as is humanly possible.
Fair call, but the rabid lunacy is normally confined to the front two thirds of the paper or the column of that giant nong Patrick Smith. Most other sport reporting is usually pretty sane.That's unlike Murdoch's papers to be publishing sensationalist bullshit. Completely out of character