Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
Exactly, it is also medically accepted that men stop growing at 21/22. Some can grow later still, but it isn't the norm. Clay is just full of shit like normal.Everyone is different. I stopped growing at 15.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Exactly, it is also medically accepted that men stop growing at 21/22. Some can grow later still, but it isn't the norm. Clay is just full of shit like normal.Everyone is different. I stopped growing at 15.
Coming from you, that's a compliment.Clay is just full of shit like normal.
Different era, but I think he was 189 or a tiny bit smaller.How tall was Tony Modra? Not a bad high marking forward.
Different era, but I think he was 189 or a tiny bit smaller.
I also think you 2 'legends' should use the ignore button
Bingo. Fyfe's 20. No more growing for him. So let's stop making up ill informed crap, like this
Fantastic if it happens but would have to be more unlikely than likely at this stage considering he still moves so awkwardly. He has always been a mark on the lead type player.
The other problem is he is often carrying an injury and has a knee issue that I'm pretty sure needs to be managed over a season, let alone a career.
It is annoying that two of our current KPP options are more like tall floating flankers (Kep and MJ), so it would be a bonus if Kep could become the real deal consistently.
So let's just say he gets there, we still need someone else coming through in the next few years. I wouldn't want to bank on Kep leading the forward line alone once Pav retires. Hopefully they grab the 'next Kep/Lynch' in the rookie draft, and the next halfway-Pav in 2012.
Suspect that could end up burning us. Only reason we traded in that pick this year was to have a first round pick after trading away pick 16 for Clark. But that didn’t come through so we were saddled with an extra pick that we didn’t really need.
Could almost guarantee that if the club could wind back the time machine, that they’d keep that compo pick. Too late now unfortunately, but hopefully Crozier will prove the mistake to be worthwhile making.
Why talk about Fyfe as a midfielder? I think he plays well as a forward or midfielder, but regardless his versatility is perhaps his number 1 weapon. I don't have a limit on how he will be used in the future or where he may end up. Morabitto the same. If our other midfielders develop well, I could see Morabitto and Fyfe causing absolute nightmares as dual CHF's, and Pav at FF. Would screw with quite a few defensive setups.
Fair call on Kep, though I would love to see him fill that option for us. And I completely agree that even if Kep is in the role, we still have some serious issues to adddress with our KPF situation.
MJ is just kind of annoying, 'nuff said.
If we had our time again we probably wouldn't of traded it, but I don't think it'll be that big of an issue. There are 6 compo picks definitely better than ours and another 3 that are probably better (I'd expect adelaide and brisbane to finish lower than us next year). I wouldn't be surprised if more than 7 were used next year, plus the compo picks for any players poached by GWS next year. I'd also be expect 3 priority picks to come before the Palmer compo (GC, Port and GWS). I see the Palmer compo pick being around pick 30 next year.
If we didn't trade it away we would've had to use picks 16, 38, 56, 72 and 83 or delist less players.
Yeah I wasn't having a crack... it's just that 5 years on I still remain a little miffed that we took Clayton Collard one pick before Adelaide picked Kurt Tippett.
and in 2010 we were 4th top (a solitary goal off 3rd)
And in 1 year when Pav was taken out of the forward line we tumbled down the ladder. What is it going to be like in a few years when he retires?
We are going to be trading heaven and earth to get a Key Position forward because we are not going to have a quality one.
Sound like good planning to you? Sure doesnt sound that way to me!
Exactly.
I could see them causing absolute nightmares all over the ground until they get too old to be used that way. No need to limit them (and get them to change their body shape) simply because we need them to fill a position we haven't recruited for.
I'm not sure why either would have to change their body shape beyond the normal maturing and developing process. Fyfe seems to resemble Hird both physically and skill-wise (god, doesn't that just make you salivate) Hird played CHF fairly regularly without having to muscle up because he had skills other guys couldn't match and Fyfe could do the same.
Mora is already a big lad. He is tall, has reasonable bulk and is still quick and agile.
We're not after Wayne Carey, we're after somone who has the ability to play the position. And the position can be redefinded somewhat to suit the gameplan which is also based on the cattle in the team. The gorilla in the goal square is the position that demands a certain type more than the CHF.
I'm not sure why either would have to change their body shape beyond the normal maturing and developing process. Fyfe seems to resemble Hird both physically and skill-wise (god, doesn't that just make you salivate) Hird played CHF fairly regularly without having to muscle up because he had skills other guys couldn't match and Fyfe could do the same.
Mora is already a big lad. He is tall, has reasonable bulk and is still quick and agile.
We're not after Wayne Carey, we're after somone who has the ability to play the position. And the position can be redefinded somewhat to suit the gameplan which is also based on the cattle in the team. The gorilla in the goal square is the position that demands a certain type more than the CHF.
We keep talking about Kersten - we could have taken McInnes at 20. He seems good enough for the slime so why not us and at 196cm has that extra height. I would have liked to take a crack at a tall as one of those 3 picks.
Good point. Hird was a bit of a freak but he realistically became more dangerous when he roamed all over the ground and ran through the midfield, rather than just played a hit-up CHF. But you're right, perhaps Fyfe wouldn't need to bulk up much considering his leap.
Mora is a big lad but he's never played forward for any length of time or aplomb at any level - he would need to spend a lot of time there to learn the role and positioning, and to improve his contested marking. And contested marking generally requires a level of bulk that midfielders would want to shed.
Mora is a midfielder through and through at this stage and was recruited as such - I'd rather benefit from that for the first half of his career and slowly develop his forward presence, rather than try and hasten his forward presence and lose/waste his midfield impact.
It seems we are always banking on quickly turning a player into something they weren't to begin with (because we have holes in the list), rather than recruiting a player to do the things that got them recruited.
I have always believed that the best coaches can structure up a decent side that plays to its strengths if they have the good quality players. It is obviously a philosophy with some weaknesses if a side is completely unbalanced. But we aren't. We have some decent players across every line, and we have others who can fill the gaps without being total spuds.
That is what we are going to see next year I hope. It is almost what Lyon specialised in at Saint Kilda. Taking a team with some great players, and a swarm of droids, then implementing a game plan to suit.