- Mar 23, 2007
- 34,932
- 23,542
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man U, Canucks and 49ers
Now that we are so cashed up, could the Hawks buy a minnow club like Gee110ng or a Franchise like Sy6n3y, turn them around and on-sell them for a tidy profit?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
We don't. Unions do. An unaffected body swooping down to save pokie patrons/victims from themselves is not going to perform the same function. There is support for problem gamblers already out there, the problem is that they have to identify themselves.
You can't help them do that.
How is stating a fact considered ignorance? Unless the Bulldogs are a powerhouse right now, why are you dishing out debt and assett advice? You don't see North telling Collingwood how to do business do you? I don't mind the Dogs but you nor your club are in a position to give financial advice. If I wanted financial advice from the WB, I might as well ask a heavy drug user who only has the clothes on his back as belongings. WB are falling further and further behind in debt while North are erasing theirs at a decent rate.
no, your club had the AFL and Mirvac, renovate and give you AFL park as well as a substantial amount of money from the sale of waverley parkhttp://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/carlton-hits-poker-machine-jackpot/story-fnelctok-1226591023028
That's right folks, My club will be rolling in cash now that our substantial investments in poker machines are in a position to pay off.
Meanwhile North supporters will blather about the virtues of being pokie free and how wonderful it is to have World Vision as their jumper sponsor. (so wonderful it yields a massive $0 per year)
Only a club as amateurishly run as North could fail to make money from poker machines.
Meanwhile as it goes even further down the gurgler James Brayshaw will inevitably beg the AFL for even larger handouts because his administration is too incompetent to raise the money itself. ******* parasites.
Oh and Doggies fans as for your club's 'suggestion' that pokie revenue should shared - I think not.
Clubs like mine took on the risk, invested the money, and spent our time making it work for us.
Now your club wants to come in and snatch the profits...... When it had exactly the same opportunities mine did but either failed to act, or wasn't willing to risk its own money to do so?
When was the last time YOUR club gave away millions of dollars to other Victorian clubs without getting a thing in return..... I'm guessing never?
Pretty sure we're reducing our debt a lot quicker than those two and we started with the same amount of debt. NFI.
Eddie, is that you? How about we strip Sydney of all assets and finances and give them to North, will that satisfy you eddie?Hmm maybe they took on some debt to buy pokies which are now delivering solid profits. Just a thought for you.
The North funding strategy seems to be, spend it, when we need more go to the Govt and AFL for more.
Eddie, is that you? How about we strip Sydney of all assets and finances and give them to North, will that satisfy you eddie?
Hmm maybe they took on some debt to buy pokies which are now delivering solid profits. Just a thought for you.
The North funding strategy seems to be, spend it, when we need more go to the Govt and AFL for more.
Make a stupid statement, "The North funding strategy seems to be, spend it, when we need more go to the Govt and AFL for more." You get one in response, so stop being a little fairy and having a whinge.Yep, typical pauper, no answers just stupid statements.
So whilst other clubs grow their revenue and profits, they are held back from investing into their footy departments because they have to 'equalise' the clubs that make terrible decisions. Whilst these clubs were putting pokies, you were organising rock on arden st.
Yep, typical pauper, no answers just stupid statements.
So whilst other clubs grow their revenue and profits, they are held back from investing into their footy departments because they have to 'equalise' the clubs that make terrible decisions. Whilst these clubs were putting pokies, you were organising rock on arden st.
Pokies are a bit like Liberal Party propaganda. They are both aimed at conning the stupid.He actually didn't bring them in, that was Joan Kirner. Their numbers exploded under Kennet. He needed the revenue after Cain / Kirner had turned the state into a financial basket case.
Make a stupid statement, "The North funding strategy seems to be, spend it, when we need more go to the Govt and AFL for more." You get one in response, so stop being a little fairy and having a whinge.
For our total gross income, $8 million from distributions out of nearly $32 million, yes solely dependent on handouts, plus we have over $9 million worth of net positive assets, we are fine. Source, 2013 report. Obviously you have an agenda and l will not engage you on this further.But that is exactly what you do. Who paid for your new facilities? In 10 years time, who will pay for the upgrade, won't be you. You do not put money into the system, you take. Why should other clubs have to fund yours? You have been around long enough to get your shit sorted, you have made terrible decisions re your finances and investments and just expect everyone else to pay.
Taxpayers, AFL, other club's, you are just the Paxtons of the AFL.
For our total gross income, $8 million from distributions out of nearly $32 million, yes solely dependent on handouts, plus we have over $9 million worth of net positive assets, we are fine. Source, 2013 report. Obviously you have an agenda and l will not engage you on this further.
Pokies are a bit like Liberal Party propaganda. They are both aimed at conning the stupid.
Now that we are so cashed up, could the Hawks buy a minnow club like Gee110ng or a Franchise like Sy6n3y, turn them around and on-sell them for a tidy profit?
Well the redevelopment and the money that has been poured into that has made Arden st indispensable in terms of business practises and club operations so is indirectly critical to our potential to revenue raise. Its a lease we haven't lost for a while, so l'm not worried about losing it anytime in the distant future and we do have other assets and much of its comes from our business/sponsorship dealings. I think we are getting a little side tracked here.Your only asset is the leasehold on Arden St.
Which:
a) reverts back to the council at the conclusion of the lease (thus - it is not really "yours"); and
b) is not a revenue-generating asset in any way, shape or form.
Hirdy hired Ian Hanke for the same reason the Liberal party did.So point out which part of what I said was actually wrong?
I should have known better than to descend to the level of a dick troll.Mmmhhhhmmm....so, tell us more about these "record memberships" in the context of having fewer home game/home and away game members than any other Victorian club?
View attachment 89379
Unions, WorkSafe, legislation.
This unaffected body is already in action, as you said, which implies that a genuine problem does exist outside of the usual propaganda of people simply choosing the lifestyle.
Really? Debt reduction advice from a Bulldog fan?
Hirdy hired Ian Hanke for the same reason the Liberal party did.
The Liberal party views you with similar respect that Hird views his supporters, or that any conman views his victims I suppose.