Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
I think the earliest we could pick, if we lose both remaining games, is 6th. I doubt Molly will still be available then, but it's not impossible. If we went with a KPF with Pick One, it could be Emma McDonald, who's tall and fast like Franklin, but much stronger in the contest. Rookie Central have her going about 8th, I think.Assuming we finish around abouts where we are on the Ladder currently, puts us in the ballpark of picking up Molly O'Hehir, she is super clean, tall, quick and fierce in terms of 1%ers. We also BADLY need a KPF and ruck if Lakay doesn't come in Marathon runner fit next season. Who is on everyones wishlist in terms of the draft (be realistic)
Assuming we finish around abouts where we are on the Ladder currently, puts us in the ballpark of picking up Molly O'Hehir, she is super clean, tall, quick and fierce in terms of 1%ers. We also BADLY need a KPF and ruck if Lakay doesn't come in Marathon runner fit next season. Who is on everyones wishlist in terms of the draft (be realistic)
I think the earliest we could pick, if we lose both remaining games, is 6th. I doubt Molly will still be available then, but it's not impossible. If we went with a KPF with Pick One, it could be Emma McDonald, who's tall and fast like Franklin, but much stronger in the contest. Rookie Central have her going about 8th, I think.
I'd take a midfielder with Pick One, because I think the crop of mids this year is better than KPFs, and because we're still not strong enough in the middle and the middle is where most AFLW games are won and lost given there's so many stoppages.Still think, if a standout like O'Hehir doesn't slide to us, we'd be equally or better suited to picking a possession pig mid. We need another elite ball winner just as much, if it's McDonald vs a mid rated slightly higher (eg if we rate Painter or Howley higher) would take the mid (best available between those two roles I guess).
Think we need a bit more of a definitive plan with what we're doing with Lakay and Lakfer. They've sort of been thrown around, partnered up with each other and multiple other options, played random game times etc. If it's decided Lakay would do 70% ruck and Lakfer 70% forward or the other way round etc would love to train that and stick with that. Have seen with Zakfer the benefits of a more settled role week-to-week.
Obviously relies a lot on Lakay coming back way fitter but yeah, think we miss a bit of that presence with those two being lost in the forward line currently and Franky being effectively solo down there.
I'd take a midfielder with Pick One, because I think the crop of mids this year is better than KPFs, and because we're still not strong enough in the middle and the middle is where most AFLW games are won and lost given there's so many stoppages.
Agreed - We simply need a blue chip mid that can hit her targets.
We are out of finals affectively after the Geelong game, which doesn't upset me as I considered us out for a couple of weeks already.
But it's time to start breaking down what list changes are needed.
Bearing in mind, I don't think any changes outside our first three picks make any difference, in that the players we bring in are unlikely to be a significant improvement on who hey replace. Maybe replace a player with one that better fits a need.
So, who is essential to keep.
Who isn't essential, but is the sort of contributor good teams need.
Who is worth keeping on potential.
Who is borderline, who is just a bit better than an automatic delist, but not good enough to be safe.
Who has to go.
For me, starting from the bottom.
Gooch, it's past her by, way to slow now. Lions game, it was obvious that they were trying to hide her as Lions were exploiting her lack of pace.
Simmons, another taken because she looked good athletically and could impose herself at lower levels, but she lacks footy skills and nouse, and is too old to let her develop.
King maybe, except I have no idea who she is or how she would go. Looking at WAFLW, she looks like she would be an 6 - 10 possessions a game mid. We have plenty, don't need more.
Petrevsky, hasn't played in 2 seasons. 4.5 possessions a game when she did play.
For me, delist those 4, bring in 4 players that should be better, then we rely on trades for movement.
Because while there are other players I would like see changed for someone better, I don't think that happens with anything below pick 3 or 4.
On SM-A346E using BigFooty.com mobile app
I know it will be more than 4 delisted. But it's those 4, plus some from the next list.Agree with all this. NGL had no idea we had King on the list, googled her, nothing online really either, half certain she doesn't exist and has been made up for some sort of tax hoax.
No articles, no photo on our list page, seemingly no draft history, was she a top-up?
Also speaking of top-ups, if they don't increase list sizes this year (they really need to) we'll need to cut a little deeper than the 4 you mentioned to take 3-4 draft picks since we have injury replacements on the list.
Of those despite liking Harken, if Sergeant gets back to fitness I don't think there's a spot for her sadly. Good state level player but just don't think has the weapons for AFLW level.
CorrectPretty sure both King and Petrevski are only train-ons.
That would be ideal. The problem with just delisting and drafting is after a few picks, you replacing poor players, with maybe marginally better players.Pretty sure both King and Petrevski are only train-ons.
What I was most surprised with last year was how we managed to land a couple of good players from interstate teams. Would be grouse to do this again. Would allow us to cut a little deeper.
Do you think Simmons should stay. If she was 19 I would say yes, but she isn't.Correct
King was named as emergency at one stage hence why you have thought she’d be on the list
They aren’t part of the squad
Gooch and Elkington will be cut for mine (not sure of Ellington’s contract status)
Simmons will go when it's clear that we can get someone better to replace her. I don't think that's this year, there's plenty less promising players we can cut first. But if she doesn't improve fast, she won't be around too long, because the new talent is coming in fast.Do you think Simmons should stay. If she was 19 I would say yes, but she isn't.
The issue with this list is, it's easy to make an argument that someone stay, but we are having to have to delist some, unless list sizes increase.
On SM-A346E using BigFooty.com mobile app
I would comfortably have Simmons in that group. I wouldn't cut Bushby or Sergeant before her for a start, possibly even Di Donato. I also strongly suspect we might see a small increase in list size. Lyons depends on who we intend to get, If we lose Lakay to LTI for instance, we are a bit short. Also suspect, we will have long term injuries next year as well, so more injury replacement spots.Simmons will go when it's clear that we can get someone better to replace her. I don't think that's this year, there's plenty less promising players we can cut first. But if she doesn't improve fast, she won't be around too long, because the new talent is coming in fast.
There's 36 on the list right now. Assuming all our inactives come back, and all our long-term injuries are playing next year, we'll need to cut 6 just to get down to size.
Then assume four draft picks. And it's even possible there'll be another free agent, maybe we'll get an Irish player now that Daisy makes the team look more attractive... but either way, at least 10 must be cut from the current list, because all their replacements will be better than them, most of them MUCH better.
So it really doesn't matter how much a particular player might deserve to stay - if she's in that bottom ten, she's gone, because there's just no room.
So this year I'd say; King, Petrevski, Di Donato, Sergeant, Gooch, Elkington, Harken, Western, Lyons and Bushby.
The year after that, it might be Simmons, but then she might improve enormously in a year, and someone else will get cut. It's going to be an endless struggle of less-impressive players fighting to improve fast enough to avoid each year's cut. In a few years, there won't be many of the current team left.
Remember King & Petrevski are train ons, not squad members. So they won’t be cut as such.So this year I'd say; King, Petrevski, Di Donato, Sergeant, Gooch, Elkington, Harken, Western, Lyons and Bushby.
Do you think Simmons should stay. If she was 19 I would say yes, but she isn't.