Why not send Collingwood there. Not like they travel much.I'm glad we are staying with Ballarat
Two home games against Suns or a SA based team makes the most sense
Might as well get a full house than 1/4 at Marvel
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why not send Collingwood there. Not like they travel much.I'm glad we are staying with Ballarat
Two home games against Suns or a SA based team makes the most sense
Might as well get a full house than 1/4 at Marvel
Why not send Collingwood there. Not like they travel much.
She smiles a lot thoughNot sure why Samantha McIntosh is in that photo... other than her relentless self-promotion. She's no longer mayor, and has failed as a state political candidate on repeat attempts.
Considering that the hill that they will replace had a legal capacity for 4000, there will be an overall increase to that footprint of about 1000. Also the designs seem to show that a new smaller raised standing area will be created to the front of the video scoreboard (which is going to be moved slightly toward the West. That would increase standing room marginally and link the new stands to the old scoreboard hill. Those changes would increase capacity slightly from 11,000 to 13,000. I went to the public information session earlier this year and asked why they didn't simply extend the existing Eastern Stand near Gate 1? The Ballarat Council representative said the current position of the Eastern light tower restricts extension, so the Council have applied to the State Government for granting of an outward extension of the stadium's land and fence line by several metres toward Creswick Road. This in turn will allow for future upgrades to include re-positioning/replacement of the light tower and the extension of the Eastern Stand would allow for a further increase of at least 1500-2000 seats. Short of bulldozing the North Ballarat Sports Club (Which a lot of people in the Ballarat Football League community would love to see ) and the construction of a much bigger stand in its place, there probably isn't much scope on the site to expand seating capacity beyond 16,000, and that's only if they eventually build a Southern Stand which might add a further 3-3500 seats. A future stand at the Southern end of the oval and a future 3-3500 seat stand at the Sports Club end would result in a 20,000(+) all seater. What would drive that is if membership in Ballarat continues to grow and attendances at games regularly sell-out before matches. While attendances have never exceeded 10,400, at least six of the 12 Bulldogs games at the ground have sold-out before the matches. The other factor which currently limits the size of the grounds capacity is that there are only two senior AFL games played there per year. Why on Earth would they consider building a 20,000 seat stadium for just two games?So what is the capacity going to be. If they are building new stands, they should be aiming for 20k.
They are interesting points to note. The Development Victoria reps explained that the Ballarat Council were adamant that they did not want to have a cookie cutter soulless stadium bowl. I suppose that they figured that we can go to the MCG or to Marvel to experience that. They wanted the stadium to have distinctly different stands with gaps between them to maintain sight lines to various geographical and historical landmarks. They wanted the stadium to have its own unique character. A regional feel. Development Victoria indicated that a third stand will be built eventually to the rear of the Eastern stand to create another stand that replicates one of the two new stands that is being built so that eventually there will be three stands down the eastern side of the Oval that each look the same but have distinct gaps between them with views to the brickwork stacks and the hills beyond. I have read on another discussion thread that they seem to want the ground to eventually be a smaller version of the Adelaide Oval (which has character) rather than a smaller version of Kardinia Park which has been developed over the years as an enclosed bowl.I hate how out of whack the stands are. You'd think the small stand would extend into the existing hill slightly so it lines up with the other side. The stands don't line up, and are all different designs. Which is different I guess.
I don't know, Kardina Park is going pretty well. Maybe they should just emulate it?They are interesting points to note. The Development Victoria reps explained that the Ballarat Council were adamant that they did not want to have a cookie cutter soulless stadium bowl. I suppose that they figured that we can go to the MCG or to Marvel to experience that. They wanted the stadium to have distinctly different stands with gaps between them to maintain sight lines to various geographical and historical landmarks. They wanted the stadium to have its own unique character. A regional feel. Development Victoria indicated that a third stand will be built eventually to the rear of the Eastern stand to create another stand that replicates one of the two new stands that is being built so that eventually there will be three stands down the eastern side of the Oval that each look the same but have distinct gaps between them with views to the brickwork stacks and the hills beyond. I have read on another discussion thread that they seem to want the ground to eventually be a smaller version of the Adelaide Oval (which has character) rather than a smaller version of Kardinia Park which has been developed over the years as an enclosed bowl.
Not sure if you've done AO before but Id argue it's better than the MCG, everytime I've attended games at AO I've fallen more in love with the look, layout and atmosphere of that ground (not to mention, food options are the best I've had).I don't know, Kardina Park is going pretty well. Maybe they should just emulate it?
It comes down to personal choice whether one likes one or the other. The Ballarat Council are the owner operators, so they get to call the shots on how the stadium develops over time. Mars Stadium still comes under a fair bit of criticism locally in Ballarat as being soulless compared with the city's old ovals (City Oval and Eastern Oval). Many locals in Ballarat still prefer to watch their footy from vantage points on grass banks under trees and to have to walk from one side of the oval to the other in order to get a beer and to go to the toilet. It just shows that you can't please everyone.I don't know, Kardina Park is going pretty well. Maybe they should just emulate it?
Best ground in Aus tbh. Apart from the past two years and a year during covid, the past 10yrs i've been there every yr for a Dogs game or the Test. Amazing set up there.Not sure if you've done AO before but Id argue it's better than the MCG, everytime I've attended games at AO I've fallen more in love with the look, layout and atmosphere of that ground (not to mention, food options are the best I've had).
I'd much rather Mar's replicate AO than KP.
If the primary objective is to bring tourism (outsiders) to Ballarat then it probably doesn’t matter what the preferences of the locals are. It would be about making it attractive for as many visitors as practicable.It comes down to personal choice whether one likes one or the other. The Ballarat Council are the owner operators, so they get to call the shots on how the stadium develops over time. Mars Stadium still comes under a fair bit of criticism locally in Ballarat as being soulless compared with the city's old ovals (City Oval and Eastern Oval). Many locals in Ballarat still prefer to watch their footy from vantage points on grass banks under trees and to have to walk from one side of the oval to the other in order to get a beer and to go to the toilet. It just shows that you can't please everyone.
From what I understood from the public information session earlier this year, that is exactly what they are planning toward doing at a future point in time when the stadium requires further expansion. The stand was initially designed for future expansion when needed. But they can't practically do it ATM because there is only enough room to the existing fence line and existing light tower placement to extend the stand back by another 10-12 rows. To build another stand there that is the same size as one of the new stands (that are about to be built) would see the existing ten rows extended back another 25 rows, including a walkway that links to the existing concourse in front of the sports club and the new walkway that will be constructed behind the first nine rows of the new stands. This is why the Council want to extend the fence line out several metres and move the light tower first. Before that can happen, the Council need to secure a 250 metres long strip of land immediately outside the current fence line. Currently, what is East of the existing fence line is Crown Land and technically part of the State owned Midland Highway.They should take the roof off and extend the stand first and leave the grassy hill. The best part for me when going to Ballarat is standing in the outer like the old days on a grassy hill.
Disappointed the AFLW team only get the one game, increasing their exposure in Ballarat would be a smart move.
Yep, I went to the Australia's Biggest Morning Tea in Ballarat back when she was Mayor. When she spoke, she definitely did bang on with a long speech and she indeed made it all about her.Not sure why Samantha McIntosh is in that photo... other than her relentless self-promotion. She's no longer mayor, and has failed as a state political candidate on repeat attempts.