Congratulations to all concerned in ensuring that there is no senior football to be played this week. It is difficult to comprehend how so many qualified individuals who make their or made their living in a field which involved dispute resolution could allow a matter like this to reach this stage? Like children in a play ground each blaming the other, and yet if a left wing, gay vegeterian lodged a complaint about a frivoulous incident these same do gooders would be all over an individual or club demanding justice or whatever else these type of complaints entail. The clubs all survive on the turnover generated from home games and the functions held afterwards. Who is going to compensate them for this? What is to stop any player(s) just getting up and leaving the competition and playing in another league as it appears that the Executive cannot organise a simple round of football? How do they argue this? There is only one option available to all on the Executive, and in quoting Cromwell in his speech to the Rump Parliament: ‘You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go.’
How many lawyers does it take to change a light bulb?
Fifty four. Eight to argue, one to get a continuance, one to object, one to demur, two to research precedents, one to dictate a letter, one to stipulate, five to turn in their time cards, one to depose, one to write interrogatories, two to settle, one to order a secretary to change the bulb, and twenty-eight to bill for professional services.
How many lawyers does it take to change a light bulb?
Fifty four. Eight to argue, one to get a continuance, one to object, one to demur, two to research precedents, one to dictate a letter, one to stipulate, five to turn in their time cards, one to depose, one to write interrogatories, two to settle, one to order a secretary to change the bulb, and twenty-eight to bill for professional services.