- Thread starter
- #26
Actually, most of my original post was not about the Hawks.
I was just stunned to see that some Vic clubs are almost at 30K already when others are only 5K- 10K. My point was than 2009 and beyond will see the rich (and well managed) getting richer and the not so rich fall further behind.
If Hawks/ Pies/ Dons / Eagles/ Crows all have 45K - 55k members then the AFL can make it very hard for clubs that have 25K and without big sponsorships to stay competitive.
This is not a good thing.
And No-name, we have over 40K last year so not much doubt we will top that next year. I look forward to having you on board.
I was just stunned to see that some Vic clubs are almost at 30K already when others are only 5K- 10K. My point was than 2009 and beyond will see the rich (and well managed) getting richer and the not so rich fall further behind.
If Hawks/ Pies/ Dons / Eagles/ Crows all have 45K - 55k members then the AFL can make it very hard for clubs that have 25K and without big sponsorships to stay competitive.
This is not a good thing.
And No-name, we have over 40K last year so not much doubt we will top that next year. I look forward to having you on board.