Strategy What to do with pick 1 now we’ve got it - Do We Need Reid or is it Curtins

Keep pick 1, or trade it?


  • Total voters
    397
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've had enough of all of these kents already.

Nothing would satisfy me more right now than drafting H.Reid and watch him kick a bag against the tin-rattlers.


And anyone else wanting to entertain splitting the pick in this massively compromised draft needs to give themselves an uppercut as well.
 
I just love it how morons think the players of teams low down on the ladder can just flick the switch and decide if they are or aren't going to win a game........

I can tell you right now if North get pick 3 and they offer WCE 2,14,19 that the WCE will accept that for pick 1.

Whinge, bitch and moan all you like, that deal would get over the line.

When 14 ends up being 20 and 19 ends up being 26 or so, no I don’t think we’d accept that. Guess we’ll have to wait and see though.
 
Is what you heard before or after the assistance package was announced?

Before.
Things have gone a little quiet and I'm only putting two and two together that North aren't stoked about what they have or will be getting for McKay.

I'll ask some more questions after the compo is confirmed I think.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

So this is where confusion sets in as I post my own opinions and I post what I have heard.

I am 100% against trading pick 1.
Pick 2, 14 and 19 would probably get Eagles to the table.
Hmm. given you’re receiving north info it’s obvs gonna be biased towards them.
I really can’t see us settling for anything less than two top 10s and a late first.
Twomey was saying on gettable north are chasing pick 10 if they can’t get GCs pick. I think 2, 10 and 20 gets it over the line, but can’t see Norf doing that unless mckay compo is band 1 as comes across reckless otherwise.
 
Hmm. given you’re receiving north info it’s obvs gonna be biased towards them.
I really can’t see us settling for anything less than two top 10s and a late first.
Twomey was saying on gettable north are chasing pick 10 if they can’t get GCs pick. I think 2, 10 and 20 gets it over the line, but can’t see Norf doing that unless mckay compo is band 1 as comes across reckless otherwise.

I don't mean Eagles would do that trade but it would get them to the table to discuss it/negotiate.
 
Hmm. given you’re receiving north info it’s obvs gonna be biased towards them.
I really can’t see us settling for anything less than two top 10s and a late first.
Twomey was saying on gettable north are chasing pick 10 if they can’t get GCs pick. I think 2, 10 and 20 gets it over the line, but can’t see Norf doing that unless mckay compo is band 1 as comes across reckless otherwise.
If North get 10 they will use on Murphy (or O’Sullivan in the unlikely event he slides), ideally they’d want pick 7/8 before compo I think the chance of using 10 to trade to one is zero. They’ll use to (perhaps) trade up a couple of spots to get O’Sullivan.
 
Perhaps if North get pick 3 as McKay compo and trade up the priority picks with GC for 4 (5) they will offer those to us for pick 1.

Imagine gaining Reid (generational talent..?) And all you've really given up is a slightly above average KPD.
 
List manager on the radio when presented with a scenario of three top ten pics for no 1 said “keep going”
Need to remind the victorian plants in this thread sometimes, downgrading to 2 and a couple of nothing picks that will end up in the 20's is not going to cut it. Not sure why they so desperately want us to give up Reid.
 
Perhaps if North get pick 3 as McKay compo and trade up the priority picks with GC for 4 (5) they will offer those to us for pick 1.

Imagine gaining Reid (generational talent..?) And all you've really given up is a slightly above average KPD.
Imagine caving and giving in to North's desires after the AFL has just given everything to them on a silver platter. Basically giving the AFL a thumbs up for their manipulation attempts and telling them they should do it again next time they want to manufacture an outcome.

Tell them all to jam it, we're taking Reid and North can use their million other picks on whoever else they want.
 
Sex life and all that…
peeling-carrots-carrot-bukkake.gif
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

With a potential 5-7 FS/ academy players north end of first round / Mackay compo and STK with gresh keeping pick one is even more vital our first second round pick likely gets the 26-28th best player available
 
I reckon we've got enought leverage to keep 19.

Or at least get that pick they have somewhere around 30.

1 => 2 and 3
1 and 19(ish) => 2, 3 and 30(ish)

I'm not sure north will have 3 though, but as I mentioned elsewhere gold coast have 4 and are only interested in the points.
When just moving picks around between teams no team is going to ever screw another team over, its going to be a win win for both teams based on particular needs. People need to put themselves in norths position and think would they do that deal? There is no way they do 2 and 3 for just 1 alone. Im a big fan of mckercher but There is no way he goes higher than Duursma. Duursma and curtin have the two highest ceilings in the draft
 
I just love it how morons think the players of teams low down on the ladder can just flick the switch and decide if they are or aren't going to win a game........

I can tell you right now if North get pick 3 and they offer WCE 2,14,19 that the WCE will accept that for pick 1.

Whinge, bitch and moan all you like, that deal would get over the line.
That would be some crazy shit. By all reports, this draft drops off at about 11 or 12. So we're downgrading Reid to either a flight risk or CHB, and getting 2 picks which would be less than a heads or tails of getting a decent role player. I think that's what Norf will offer, but I'll be surprised if we take it.
 
When just moving picks around between teams no team is going to ever screw another team over, its going to be a win win for both teams based on particular needs. People need to put themselves in norths position and think would they do that deal? There is no way they do 2 and 3 for just 1 alone.
Good then we keep pick 1.

Im a big fan of mckercher but There is no way he goes higher than Duursma. Duursma and curtin have the two highest ceilings in the draft
What? Would've thought Reid and Walter had the highest ceilings.
 
That would be some crazy s**t. By all reports, this draft drops off at about 11 or 12. So we're downgrading Reid to either a flight risk or CHB, and getting 2 picks which would be less than a heads or tails of getting a decent role player. I think that's what Norf will offer, but I'll be surprised if we take it.
Don't question it, just shut up and take the shit offer.

If the club even considers an offer like that for a moment then it needs to be folded. Would just be genuinely negligent, delusional recruiting. Surely the club is aware that their drafting of picks in the teens and twenties is hit and miss at best and wouldn't give up the exact kind of player we need for a couple of coin tosses...

The kind of decision making a gambling addict would run with.
 
Imagine caving and giving in to North's desires after the AFL has just given everything to them on a silver platter. Basically giving the AFL a thumbs up for their manipulation attempts and telling them they should do it again next time they want to manufacture an outcome.

Tell them all to jam it, we're taking Reid and North can use their million other picks on whoever else they want.

It isn’t going to happen as no way Nth would offer it, but 2,3,5 for 1+19 would be an offer too good to refuse.

Curtin plus
Pair the Tassie boys or Duursma plus the left over Tassie boy (whoever Hawks don’t take).

No way in the world it is offered, but that is too good to refuse.

Personally I am really happy taking Reid instead of anything less. At a pinch I’d swap #5 for their 2024 1st, but again there is no way they offer (or the afl let them) that much.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
When just moving picks around between teams no team is going to ever screw another team over, its going to be a win win for both teams based on particular needs. People need to put themselves in norths position and think would they do that deal? There is no way they do 2 and 3 for just 1 alone. Im a big fan of mckercher but There is no way he goes higher than Duursma. Duursma and curtin have the two highest ceilings in the draft
Curtin hasn't done much at all. I'm not seeing this ceiling you are talking about. Been watching his matches closely for the past 6 months. His going to take a bit of time I'm afraid to get to AFL standard. 3 years minimum before we can even reap some rewards out of him.

And you forgot Reid. Who has by far the highest ceiling in the draft by a long margin if we are going to go there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top