What would a Dutton Liberal leadership mean for the Liberals and the country?

Remove this Banner Ad

So we're supposed to give up on windfarms and transmission lines because of NIMBYs and go for Nuclear because there won't be any NIMBY issues?

You've not got any idea of the constant failure of trying to find a nuclear waste facility in Australia. It's been failing for 50 years.

Compared to whingers about turbines who are mostly just Nationals voters(egged on by Nats MPs) objecting on principle, the nuclear waste opposition is gargantuan, bipartisan and internationally co-ordinated.
Why is it gargantuan?
I was listening to Ziggy Switkowski the other day and he said its not a big deal and that most nuclear waste is disposed of on-site these days.
Like I've said ad-nauseum, if almost every other country in the world can resolve the nuclear waste issue (if it's even an issue) then I'm sure some smart minds in Australia can find a solution to it as well. Its not 1960 anymore you realise.
 
Why is it gargantuan?
I was listening to Ziggy Switkowski the other day and he said its not a big deal and that most nuclear waste is disposed of on-site these days.
Like I've said ad-nauseum, if almost every other country in the world can resolve the nuclear waste issue (if it's even an issue) then I'm sure some smart minds in Australia can find a solution to it as well. Its not 1960 anymore you realise.
The anti-nuclear movement still exists and is powerful and organised at the local and international level.


Like we keep replying ad-nauseum, other countries are having problems with the very thing you're saying they've solved.


Even if the U.S. starts today, it will take decades to site, design and build a facility for disposal of its nuclear waste stockpile. That process must accelerate now, before the reactors we need for their electricity run out of room for their growing inventories of highly radioactive waste.

It's 2024, it's much harder to get environmental approvals than it was in the 1960's.

The countries which have built plants (outside of China), did it with Russia's help and have also had Russia commit to taking their waste.

Are we going to get China or Russia to build our nuclear plants, by the way?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Who cares - Most people are heartily sick of activists these days.


These shuttered plants storing nuclear waste are all across the USA, with limited protection and next to no plans for what to do with it. And they're all next to rivers and waterways, because nuclear plants need stacks of water (another massive problem).
 
Who cares - Most people are heartily sick of activists these days.
What about the scientists who say it's a terrible idea, the economists who say it's absurdly expensive and the banks who won't fund it. Sick of all them too?
 
The overwhelming argument for nuclear is that it will safely and efficiently ease the transition to renewables without hiking up prices. Now you can disagree with that premise all you want if you like but that will be the platform that the LNP will go with at the next election.

Now this is an assumption stated as fact.
 
You're 'pretty sure' ?
How about being 100% certain next time and maybe posting a link for evidence.
Alanis Morissette Reaction GIF by MOODMAN
 
What about the scientists who say it's a terrible idea, the economists who say it's absurdly expensive and the banks who won't fund it. Sick of all them too?
There are just as many who say the opposite and there is also the knowledge that it works overseas.
I mean we could both cherry pick people to suit our arguments so its pointless at the end of the day.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

No, it is not.
Stop being so emotional.
There is not an equal amount of scientists that back it, an equal number of economists that believe it offers value for money or an equal number of banks (or other private investment) willing to fund it. You're spreading lies. This is not an equally contested idea.
 
There is not an equal amount of scientists that back it, an equal number of economists that believe it offers value for money or an equal number of banks (or other private investment) willing to fund it. You're spreading lies. This is not an equally contested idea.
Do you have the official numbers or is it just the vibe?
By the way, it appears to satisfy your criteria across the western world.
 
Apropos of nothing I can't see the point in arguing with trolls once they've made it clear they're not interested in an honest discussion, it just makes for tedious reading that I can't be bothered with.
 
Apropos of nothing I can't see the point in arguing with trolls once they've made it clear they're not interested in an honest discussion, it just makes for tedious reading that I can't be bothered with.
While this is true I have a compulsion to point out the BS. Just throwing out garbage statements like "it will safely and efficiently ease the transition to renewables without hiking up prices" can't be left unchallenged especially when the extremists who are pushing this policy haven't provided any data to back this up whatsoever.
 
Apropos of nothing I can't see the point in arguing with trolls once they've made it clear they're not interested in an honest discussion, it just makes for tedious reading that I can't be bothered with.

Whats the difference between a nuclear activist and a troll?

Who cares - Most people are heartily sick of activists these days.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

What would a Dutton Liberal leadership mean for the Liberals and the country?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top