Where does Marcus Bontempelli sit in the players of this era

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Best player in the game.

His decade of consistency and durability actually puts him above Dangerfield, Fyfe and Martin for me personally.

Dusty is clearly still the best big game player of this era, but he has more flaws in his game. Likewise Dangerfield and Fyfe.

Bont is good to elite at every part of Australian rules football.

Been an absolute pleasure watching him. Still a lot of good years left as well.
 
Best player in the game.

His decade of consistency and durability actually puts him above Dangerfield, Fyfe and Martin for me personally.

Dusty is clearly still the best big game player of this era, but he has more flaws in his game. Likewise Dangerfield and Fyfe.

Bont is good to elite at every part of Australian rules football.

Been an absolute pleasure watching him. Still a lot of good years left as well.

Yeah, I agree.

Have always been a huge Fyfe and Dusty fan but I think the Bonts versatility and consistency has seen him go past them.

The perfect Aussie rules player. I love watching him.
 
Club best and fairest in a premiership year is a huge accolade but he's been captain of a side that's chronically underperformed in quite a few seasons, especially in finals.
Taints my view of him a little bit, maybe.
 
And you view of Max Gawn then?
I don't think our level of underperformance has been comparable to the Dogs. We've finished Top 4 in the home and away season since the flag, and we've accounted for ourselves fairly reasonably in finals- we've lost to some decent sides.
Since losing the grand final, the Dogs missed finals last year entirely and completely shat the bed against Fremantle? That's with JUH being gifted to them...

That said, I feel similar about Max especially wrt to leadership. No question he's the best ruckman of this era though.

Edit: As an aside, if I recall correctly, Bontempelli had his hand on his hips while Trac and Oliver absolutely smashed them in the middle in that third quarter. I don't think you can look at the finals we've lost and say it's because Max was being brushed aside.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Bont's output has barely changed since his 3rd year. I think he is massively under-hyped because he is at the bulldogs.

These stats line up with anyone in the game.
View attachment 2023242

People forget that Bont had articles like this being written about him in his third year: https://www.afl.com.au/news/42940/is-the-bont-the-best-20-year-old-weve-seen

His 2017 and 2018 seasons saw a mild plateau due to some pretty painful hip trouble that was kept mostly under wraps. After 2019 though, he's barely missed a beat and has probably been the undisputed 'best' in league since 2021.
 
I think Bont is better than Fyfe but definitely not Judd
Bont beats Judd on kicks, handballs, marks, goals and tackles.

He also has better kicking depth.

Judd did win the Brownlow twice but one was only because of the Carlton rule that allows you to break someone's face and still be considered fairest. (Patrick Cripps also benefited from this rule).

Judd did have more burst speed but Bont loses nothing compared to Judd.
 
Bont for me is like Robbie Flower. As much as we don't value the Brownlow sometimes, champions who don't win one just don't seem to be spoken in the same conversation as ones who have (Pendles is the exception because Collingwood). I think he's one of the best players I've seen. I'd rate him over Dangerfield and he's spoken about as one of the best in the last 20 years.
 
As poor as the Brownlow is as an indicator of the best player in a given season, the legacy aspect of it is huge for any players career. It would be sad if the Bont didn't win one - it would mean that his excellence would be more likely to be overshadowed in a generation's time by his contemporaries. He's clearly the best since Danger and Dusty, and will likely be held in similar acclaim by career's end. He's well on target to play at least 350+ games, and will likely extend his career by playing in the forwardline so I wouldn't be shocked if he racks up the goals in that area.

He'll easily be the best Dog of all time if his career ended tomorrow. It remains to be seen where he'll land in terms of the all-time and era discussions, which will be very nuanced.
Note to self: It pays to read the replies already posted before adding your 2 cents worth
 
As a player he's absolute top shelf, approaching Quinlan/ Dempsey/Hawkins tier as the best Dog of my time, if not there already

Peak is amazing and regularly performs near his best too so satisfies both quality and quantity measures.

The question about him as captain isn't completely relevant, but if we include leadership as a criterion then I think he's a good captain now, excellent as an exemplar (do as I do) and getting better at on field coaching (do as i say). As for inspiration, we'd have to ask the players but he does seem to lift them with brilliant acts and to my limjted viewing it seems to lift his boys.

Leadership is a useful skill, it puts Hodge and Voss in these discussions (and was GAJs only mediocre attribute).
 
Best player in the game currently. Complete player. Does it all. Works his tail off defensively which I personally love. Beautiful to watch, at times it looks like the game is in slow motion for him.

Buddy and GaJ ahead of him but geez he's coming fast to sit comfortably with those 2. In the last 20 years they are the only 2 I'd take ahead of him.

Danger and Fyfe kicking not as good.
Dusty has no defensive side

Will be a legend.
 
He carries his team on his shoulders. It is quite outstanding that not only can he do it at the coalface, but he also hits the scoreboard. Going at 0.97 goals per game after 230 games is quite brilliant, and he'll have no issues spending his twilight years up forward and being able to kick 40 goals in a season.

He is quite sublime in all aspects.
 
Cleansweep17 - your thoughts?

(This is the poster who has D. Martin as the GOAT, though would rate him significantly lower had Houli received the 2017 Norm Smith Medal ahead of Martin).

Yep most likely Neale.

Neale: 2 x Brownlows, 1 MVP, 1 Coaches award

Bont: 0 x Brownlow, 2 MVPs, 1 Coaches award

So Neale has more (4 v 3) and at least one of each.

Bont has no individual finals awards to counteract this either.

The End Fadge.
 
There you go, folks.

Falcon has spoken.

The End and Cope.

Do you just deny reality. He literally has more big awards. Including the 2 most prestigious and 1 of each. Was also 1 vote off 3 in 4 years.

Only like 15 players have won 2 Brownlows. That’s Uber elite and that’s what people will see when they google Neale and Brownlow records.

Your stuffed eye test means f all in the record books.
 
Love the Bont and do think he’s in the best few players in the game.

He is definitely underexposed by being at the Bulldogs. Place him in a big 4 team and I think the media circle jerk would make the Naicos circle jerk look like the premature ejaculation of a teenage boy.

Will finish this season as a 29 year old 6xAA and 6xB&F winner. Will also be very close to a top 10 vote winner in the Brownlow. Could well play five more seasons and set some records.
 
Bont for me is like Robbie Flower. As much as we don't value the Brownlow sometimes, champions who don't win one just don't seem to be spoken in the same conversation as ones who have (Pendles is the exception because Collingwood). I think he's one of the best players I've seen. I'd rate him over Dangerfield and he's spoken about as one of the best in the last 20 years.
It's completely bizarre, but I think you're probably right
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Where does Marcus Bontempelli sit in the players of this era

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top