- Nov 16, 2022
- 882
- 1,839
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
I think Bont is better than Fyfe but definitely not JuddNo doubt Bont is playing some amazing footy, in particular the last 2 seasons, but he's not at these guys level just yet.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think Bont is better than Fyfe but definitely not JuddNo doubt Bont is playing some amazing footy, in particular the last 2 seasons, but he's not at these guys level just yet.
Great post (except for the inclusion of Dusty).Leaving WCE people out here....
Absolute Top Tier - LEGENDS (since 2000)
Buddy, Dusty, Goodes & Nick Daicos
Bont not in their class.
Best player in the game.
His decade of consistency and durability actually puts him above Dangerfield, Fyfe and Martin for me personally.
Dusty is clearly still the best big game player of this era, but he has more flaws in his game. Likewise Dangerfield and Fyfe.
Bont is good to elite at every part of Australian rules football.
Been an absolute pleasure watching him. Still a lot of good years left as well.
And you view of Max Gawn then?Club best and fairest in a premiership year is a huge accolade but he's been captain of a side that's chronically underperformed in quite a few seasons, especially in finals.
Taints my view of him a little bit, maybe.
I don't think our level of underperformance has been comparable to the Dogs. We've finished Top 4 in the home and away season since the flag, and we've accounted for ourselves fairly reasonably in finals- we've lost to some decent sides.And you view of Max Gawn then?
People forget that Bont had articles like this being written about him in his third year: https://www.afl.com.au/news/42940/is-the-bont-the-best-20-year-old-weve-seenBont's output has barely changed since his 3rd year. I think he is massively under-hyped because he is at the bulldogs.
These stats line up with anyone in the game.
View attachment 2023242
Bont beats Judd on kicks, handballs, marks, goals and tackles.I think Bont is better than Fyfe but definitely not Judd
Note to self: It pays to read the replies already posted before adding your 2 cents worthAs poor as the Brownlow is as an indicator of the best player in a given season, the legacy aspect of it is huge for any players career. It would be sad if the Bont didn't win one - it would mean that his excellence would be more likely to be overshadowed in a generation's time by his contemporaries. He's clearly the best since Danger and Dusty, and will likely be held in similar acclaim by career's end. He's well on target to play at least 350+ games, and will likely extend his career by playing in the forwardline so I wouldn't be shocked if he racks up the goals in that area.
He'll easily be the best Dog of all time if his career ended tomorrow. It remains to be seen where he'll land in terms of the all-time and era discussions, which will be very nuanced.
Cleansweep17 - your thoughts?
(This is the poster who has D. Martin as the GOAT, though would rate him significantly lower had Houli received the 2017 Norm Smith Medal ahead of Martin).
There you go, folks.Yep most likely Neale.
Neale: 2 x Brownlows, 1 MVP, 1 Coaches award
Bont: 0 x Brownlow, 2 MVPs, 1 Coaches award
So Neale has more (4 v 3) and at least one of each.
Bont has no individual finals awards to counteract this either.
The End Fadge.
There you go, folks.
Falcon has spoken.
The End and Cope.
It's completely bizarre, but I think you're probably rightBont for me is like Robbie Flower. As much as we don't value the Brownlow sometimes, champions who don't win one just don't seem to be spoken in the same conversation as ones who have (Pendles is the exception because Collingwood). I think he's one of the best players I've seen. I'd rate him over Dangerfield and he's spoken about as one of the best in the last 20 years.