TrimmyTraggot
Rookie
- Oct 2, 2020
- 47
- 33
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Banned
- #51
Geelong have won 2 flags in the past 3 years and we are shooting for our 3rd. There are no other option
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You for real?The Richmond army is huge ... when we are winning ... when we are losing you can hear the sound of the crickets chirping. .
It depends on how you measure it. In 2020 West Coast had the most members. I think there is likely to be more Collingwood supporters in Australia than any other club, as annoying as it is to admit it.
The Richmond army is huge ... when we are winning ... when we are losing you can hear the sound of the crickets chirping. Whether Collingwood are winning or losing their supporters still pack the stands.
No one is forgetting the empty stadiums of Richmond home games in the 2000s when they had played one finals series in 30 yearsYou for real?
A club with claims of being the 'biggest' wouldn't have average crowds of 15,000 per game less than the top drawing clubs of that season...i suppose its pretty hard to forget something you never knew in the first place
View attachment 1009482
Good thing we didn't then, even when we were at our worst and rooted to the bottom of the ladder.A club with claims of being the 'biggest' wouldn't have average crowds of 15,000 per game less than the top drawing clubs of that season...
Ah, the old 'home game subset' argument, hey....Good thing we didn't then, even when we were at our worst and rooted to the bottom of the ladder.
To be honest, I'm impressed that while being at our worst point of the previous 25 years, we only averaged 7k lower home game attendances compared to a fellow contender for biggest club who had just come off 2 grand final appearances. If that's the best you got, I'm not particularly worried.
Fine then total average, which was 10k. That's barely different. Certainly nowhere near the 15k that people who can't do maths would claim. Again, we are comparing a 25 year basket case on the bottom of the ladder to a team that made the previous 2 grand finals. The fact we were even in the top half is a testament, only an idiot or a troll would think otherwise. And I care not for the opinion of idiots or trolls.Ah, the old 'home game subset' argument, hey....
10k, or 23%, is 'barely different'?Fine then total average, which was 10k. That's barely different. Certainly nowhere near the 15k that people who can't do maths would claim. Again, we are comparing a 25 year basket case to a team that made the previous 2 grand finals. The fact we were even in the too half is a testament, only an idiot or a troll would think otherwise. And I care not for the opinion of idiots or trolls.
What is biggest?
Is it revenue? Then probably West Coast, who are able to generate a substantial amount from their limited membership numbers and two-town market. But then again, it is a two-town market.
Is it members? Well then its Richmond. I know Tigers fans like to think this, but then again, their social media platforms trail other clubs in terms of engagement, so I think they're just really good at converting 'fans' in to 'members'.
Is it media demand? Well then it's Essendon. They drive a hell of a lot of clicks. But maybe that's just a hangover from the supplements scandal.
Is it arses in seats? Ok well then it's Collingwood. But they do play the majority of their games at a substantially sized stadium.
Whatever 'it' is - I can tell you no one here is going to be 'right'; and most will simply argue the point that suggests their team is the biggest.
Outside of the media which is run out of Melbourne, you could argue that West Coast is bigger in every other area.
Not sure how - West Coast has never been the highest attended side, and as recently as four years ago wasn't even in the top 4-5.
They also have an ability to turn a $ per ticket that other clubs can't for various reasons.
Not debating they are 'big' - just suggesting your claim they can be argued as bigger in every other area probably isn't true.
West Coast get 50,000 plus of their own supporters to their home games just about every week. No Victorian side can say that.
Agree it is difficult to say.. Essendon do have the most media demand and most website hits WCE not even close.What is biggest?
Is it revenue? Then probably West Coast, who are able to generate a substantial amount from their limited membership numbers and two-town market. But then again, it is a two-town market.
Is it members? Well then its Richmond. I know Tigers fans like to think this, but then again, their social media platforms trail other clubs in terms of engagement, so I think they're just really good at converting 'fans' in to 'members'.
Is it media demand? Well then it's Essendon. They drive a hell of a lot of clicks. But maybe that's just a hangover from the supplements scandal.
Is it arses in seats? Ok well then it's Collingwood. But they do play the majority of their games at a substantially sized stadium.
Whatever 'it' is - I can tell you no one here is going to be 'right'; and most will simply argue the point that suggests their team is the biggest.
Carlton would have been as big as Collingwood in around 1980-81. Massive. They seemed to fall behind as Essendon emerged in the mid-80’s and would have been 3rd for support in Victoria, from the perspective of a neutral. I think we’ll see what the blues are capable of when they climb the ladder in the next 4-5 years and hopefully they get more games at the MCG.Agree it is difficult to say.. Essendon do have the most media demand and most website hits WCE not even close.
Collingwood and Carlton are 1 and 2 in terms of overall search interest on Google since 2004. WCE are equal 4th with Richmond both way below Essendon who are third.
Collingwood and Carlton are 1 and 2 with the highest average TV audience in a season with Essendon third WCE 4th.
Collingwood and Carlton are 1 and 2 in unique Youtube views with Coll at 520,000 and Carlton at 464,000 and 1 and 2 in subscribers.
Essendon are second in Facebook have 84,000 members and not one a final since 2004 that is a big club.
Carlton would have been as big as Collingwood in around 1980-81. Massive. They seemed to fall behind as Essendon emerged in the mid-80’s and would have been 3rd for support in Victoria, from the perspective of a neutral. I think we’ll see what the blues are capable of when they climb the ladder in the next 4-5 years and hopefully they get more games at the MCG.
VFL home and away 1925-1941
Carlton 6,453,474
Richmond 5,705,325
South Melbourne 5,460,580
Collingwood 5,242,330
St Kilda 4,882,603
Essendon 4,647,125
Footscray 4,587,062
Melbourne 4,534,566
Fitzroy 4,487,053
Geelong 4,360,087
North Melbourne 3,260,847
Hawthorn 2,961,458
VFL home and away 1960-1977
Collingwood 10,653,827
Richmond 9,882,139
Carlton 9,479,277
Melbourne 9,257,471
Essendon 8,622,204
St Kilda 8,139,310
Geelong 7,801,814
Hawthorn 6,995,164
Footscray 6,939,251
South Melbourne 6,263,811
Fitzroy 5,973,928
North Melbourne 5,613,855
AFL home and away 1997 - 2014
Collingwood 20,119,156
Essendon 18,761,728
Carlton 16,157,619
Richmond 15,733,715
Hawthorn 14,189,768
Adelaide 13,498,176
Geelong 13,399,210
St Kilda 13,145,652
West Coast 12,847,639
Melbourne 12,461,141
Sydney 12,261,147
W Bulldogs 11,700,503
North Melbourne 11,584,999
Fremantle 11,247,356
Brisbane Lions 10,781,670
Port Adelaide 10,727,516
Across VFL/AFL history Carlton (1, 2, 3), Richmond (2, 2, 4) and Collingwood (4, 1, 1) have been the only consistent 'big clubs'. For all intent and purpose, in terms of football history, its really a big 3 (Collingwood, Richmond and Carlton) with Essendon in 4th
In terms of the climbers, Hawthorn (12, 8, 5) have basically been on a continuous upswing since the mid 1960s (which is a common theme in this thread). Essendon's emergence from a middle of the road club was very late from 6, 5 to a clear 2nd (probably the Sheedy factor).
South Melbourne (3, 10, 11) was a seriously big club through the 20's and 30's but dropped off dramatically in the 50's, 60's and 70's. Melbourne (8, 4, 10) started low, emerged and dropped back to mediocrity while the Saints (5, 6, 8) and Dogs (6, 9, 12) all started from pretty big bases (certainly bigger than Hawthorn and North Melbourne) but decades without premiership success have hindered their growth...
All things considered, I think you are spot on with this post...although you are selling Carlton short massively. For most of their history, Carlton was one of the 2 biggest clubs in the league (with Richmond up to 1940, with Collingwood up until the mid 1990's)
Another stat post, sorry guys