Which team out of Adelaide, North and Hawthorn has the better youth?

Which team has the better youth?

  • Adelaide

    Votes: 315 28.3%
  • Hawthorn

    Votes: 335 30.1%
  • North

    Votes: 462 41.5%

  • Total voters
    1,112

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yet another false equivalence from you, Adelaide’s top 10 is a lot harder to break into than hawthorns
Because of the amount of older players who you rely on every week?

1 Dawson
2 Walker
3 Laird
4 Murray
5 Hinge
6 Rankine
7 O'Brien
8 Keays
9 Jones
10 Milera
 

Log in to remove this ad.

How many hawthorn players under 23 would be on that list? I can only think of 2
They will both likely be in the top 3, so that’s 2 more than you’ll have in yours, and they’d be the 2 best young mids on your list by a street.

Did also get a chuckle out of your top 10 being headed up by Walker and Laird and being rounded out by such average players as Keays, Jones and Milera after months in here of pumping up your youth and stating your top 10 would be hard to get into.
 
They will both likely be in the top 3, so that’s 2 more than you’ll have in yours, and they’d be the 2 best young mids on your list by a street.

Did also get a chuckle out of your top 10 being headed up by Walker and Laird and being rounded out by such average players as Keays, Jones and Milera after months in here of pumping up your youth and stating your top 10 would be hard to get into.
You do you realise we haven’t had bnf yet?

Milera and Jones have both improved significantly this year, and I would still count Jones as youth

Like I said Adelaide’s top 10 a lot harder to break into
 
You do you realise we haven’t had bnf yet?

Milera and Jones have both improved significantly this year, and I would still count Jones as youth

Like I said Adelaide’s top 10 a lot harder to break into
Please, Jones is ordinary. Milera will be retired before he ever fulfills his potential.

Do you know what the word “prediction” means?
 
Higher talent not necessarily better performed.

They’re all ‘youth’ but hawthorns standout mid prospects are a year or 2 older than Adelaide’s.

How do you determine "higher" talent?

I'm not sure if you've conceded or not, but your certainly aren't saying that Crows youth has performed better.
 
That you have no response for, because it’s true
I certainly don’t watch them with the rose-coloured glasses that a few of you do.

What young talent is going to be on show in your B&F top 5?
 
I certainly don’t watch them with the rose-coloured glasses that a few of you do.

What young talent is going to be on show in your B&F top 5?

This just sounds like an argument based on "we know we're shit, how dare you for not being". Because if kids are in your B&F top 5 and you're not a finalist, that's an indicator that your list is shit.

For point two, Rankine will and Murray would have if he didn't do an ACL with 5-6 rounds left - but both are probably generous to be considered kids.
 
This just sounds like an argument based on "we know we're s**t, how dare you for not being". Because if kids are in your B&F top 5 and you're not a finalist, that's an indicator that your list is s**t.

For point two, Rankine will and Murray would have if he didn't do an ACL with 5-6 rounds left - but both are probably generous to be considered kids.
So none, therefore once again confirming that Crows 2023 wins came on the back of their older players, not any outstanding youth.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

But that doesn't matter. According to Mr MysteryGuest Crows have "higher" talent. I'm not sure what this means, although I did ask. Maybe, Crows are taller??
it’s the jumper they wear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top