How about these examples?
Are you reading what I am?
Most of these don't appear as anything beyond what we've read all summer and a good portion is tongue in cheek as a direct response to what has been written all summer (2 players not being worth 1 of North's, Thomas will be AA, etc).
You have even quoted posts that are listing stats from the first week or analysing the performance of individuals in that game. That is not outlandish - they are actual facts.
Even the idea that you think posts like Newcombe > Powell is somehow outlandish, even though it was responded to by several posts declaring Powell to be a future Brownlow medallist, "Porsche" etc and Newcome having a low ceiling, amounting to nothing more than an "honest trier", "already peaked", "Toyota Camry", etc. At this stage, Powell has not proven he will significantly better so to think otherwise is not trolling. Same goes for Stephenson and Moore (which again, was more of a response to the all the off season posts saying the comparison was laughable)