Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Herne might be trying to suggest, I think, that the police got over the fence and drew their weapons. I can't see it in the circumstances but even if they had, it still isn't justification.
Not to forget they also shot one of their neighbours in the back and wounded the other one.
I'm not sure that logic works? What difference would it have made if they had managed to take them alive? Surely if a cover up was needed the two surviving constables would need to be silenced instead
I'm not justifying anything that the three did, I'm speculating on what force command did or didn't do, we'll only get their side of events now.
All I've asked since the start of this thread is why it was necessary to send 4 cops for a simple welfare check. If they sent 4 because of a potential problem with whoever was there, why were they all young constables, if you're sending 4, why not at least one with some rank and more experience.
Yes but isn't that the part (initial contact/ instructions/ welfare check/ warrant) that seems the most confusing? Surely this is where the two surviving cops would have the most relevant story to tell.Were the 2 surviving connies still there on site when the gun battle took place? I'd doubt it very much. Their involvement will be about the initial contact and what their orders / instructions were when going to conduct the welfare check
Coppers regulary double up on jobs if they aren't currently tasked to anything else.
Safety in numbers.
People thinking two cars heading to a welfare job as being out of the ordinary are just showing their complete lack of knowledge surrounding Police operations.
No one is saying there’s a conspiracy of the government or police to get the Trains. That’s very hard to believe, although not impossible it would be pretty far fetched.
Jesus Christ, the PC internet police are at it again. Can you all please stop with the instant dismissal of any discussion around police failures.
No one is saying anybody deserved to die. It’s a tragedy.
No one is saying there’s a conspiracy of the government or police to get the Trains. That’s very hard to believe, although not impossible it would be pretty far fetched.
What people are legitimately trying to discuss without being told they are lunatics is that the police failed and it cost lives. Do any of you actually read or just sit on your moral high horses 24/7
Two from Tara, two from Chinchilla?It's not a potential domestic, it's a simple welfare check.
My brother was a Vic cop for 20 years, he also said if there's not a lot happening it's not unusual for more than one car to be sent, in this case from two separate towns, he did however think it was overkill for a welfare.
It's not a potential domestic, it's a simple welfare check.
My brother was a Vic cop for 20 years, he also said if there's not a lot happening it's not unusual for more than one car to be sent, in this case from two separate towns, he did however think it was overkill for a welfare.
Coppers regulary double up on jobs if they aren't currently tasked to anything else.
Safety in numbers.
People thinking two cars heading to a welfare job as being out of the ordinary are just showing their complete lack of knowledge surrounding Police operations.
Sure but we were querying in the thread whether there may have been any obvious question of safety on a 'welfare check' before they attended the property, this was before we realised there was also warrant for a border breach/unsecured guns.
'Not related' until there's evidence that it is. That's how it works.
It's being investigated.
How can they rule out related or not?
It’s suspicious… do you normally rule out something before gathering all evidence?
People thinking two cars heading to a welfare job as being out of the ordinary are just showing their complete lack of knowledge surrounding Police operations.
Did you miss the part where the police finally admitted there was a weapons-related warrant involved?
No, the warrant was issued for the breach of states border. The firearms were to be asked about as part of that arrest on a seperate charge.
So you understand this was no simple 'welfare check'.
The mental gymnastics some of you guys are displaying is equal parts amusing and alarming.
So you understand this was no simple 'welfare check'.
The mental gymnastics some of you guys are displaying is equal parts amusing and alarming.
There's very little talk between state agencies (absolutely needs to change after this tragedy) so whatever information was on NSW databases wouldn't have been accessible to QLD police.
There was a couple of quotes from the other neighbour early in the piece, that I can't find now. When he came back, he told Mrs Dare that Alan was "in a bad way", but didn't give any other information. Then when they were told to evacuate, he came back and got her out.The one person that hasn’t had a lot said about, is the other neighbour that went over with Alan Dare.
Would be interesting to hear what they witnessed and the circumstances in which Alan was shot in the back. Did they even see the Trains and communicate with them, or were they just covertly hunted?
There was a couple of quotes from the other neighbour early in the piece, that I can't find now. When he came back, he told Mrs Dare that Alan was "in a bad way", but didn't give any other information. Then when they were told to evacuate, he came back and got her out.
There was no information that I read about how it happened only that they were fired on when they reached the property and Dare was shot in the back. Presumably the other neighbour left on foot as the car was left at the scene.
Kerry Dare's interview is in here. I don't think Alan and the other neighbour had gone on to the property, he was shot on the road.