- Aug 23, 2011
- 19,105
- 62,069
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Grand Finals at the Gabba
After looking at the ladder prediction thread, it seems Port are the popular choice as the slider in 2014 with perceived harder draw the main reason. I even tipped them to slide out of the 8 but after looking at their list I'm not so sure. The thing that stands out about Port is the age of their best 22.
B: Jonas (22), Carlisle (26), Pittard (22)/Hombsch (20)
HB: Hartlett (23), Trengove (23), O'Shea (21)
C: Broadbent (23), Boak (25), Wines (19)
HF: Monfries (26), Westhoff (27), Wingard (20)
F: Gray (25), Schulz (28), Butcher (22)/Redden (22)
Fol: Lobbe (24), Cornes (30), Ebert (23)
Int: Moore (22), Cassisi (31), Polec (21), White (26)
There's only 4 guys in there that are over 26: Cassisi (31), Cornes (30), Schulz (28) and Westhoff (27). Cassisi only played 12 games this year and the others shouldn't slow down in 2014. Odds are that a fair chunk of their young guys will continue to develop and improve this year with very few players declining no losses due to retirement.
They were the youngest (non-expansion) team in the AFL this year, yet still managed to win 13 games despite giving away a significant age and experience advantage nearly every week. Here's the average age of each club in 2013 (the age of the actual sides that lined up each week, not the irrelevant list age):
Sydney: 26.24
Hawthorn: 25.97
Geelong: 25.86
St Kilda: 25.54
Carlton: 25.33
Fremantle: 25.20
West Coast: 25.19
Collingwood: 25.17
Richmond: 24.96
Essendon: 24.82
North Melb: 24.78
Bulldogs: 24.61
Brisbane: 24.55
Adelaide: 24.40
Melbourne: 24.04
Port Adelaide: 23.75
Gold Coast: 22.98
GWS: 21.60
So as you can see the age ladder roughly correlates to the actual ladder, with a couple of big outliers. Last year it was Richmond in a similar position. They were the youngest (non-expansion) club with an average of 23.89 and won 10.5 games, and they surged up the ladder the following year.
So will Port really be the slider? With guys like Wines (19), Wingard (20), Hartlett (23) and Ebert (23) all a year closer to their prime, and nobody of any value leaving the club, it's hard to see them sliding even with a slighly harder draw. The one thing that you could count against them is that they had a pretty good run with injuries. Dom Cassisi only managed 12 games and Jarrad Redden went down for the season, but other than that their list was pretty healthy for most of the year and quite a few players played 22-24 games. Even Robbie Gray managed 20 games.
So what does everyone think? To me their scope for improvement over the next year or two is enormous.
B: Jonas (22), Carlisle (26), Pittard (22)/Hombsch (20)
HB: Hartlett (23), Trengove (23), O'Shea (21)
C: Broadbent (23), Boak (25), Wines (19)
HF: Monfries (26), Westhoff (27), Wingard (20)
F: Gray (25), Schulz (28), Butcher (22)/Redden (22)
Fol: Lobbe (24), Cornes (30), Ebert (23)
Int: Moore (22), Cassisi (31), Polec (21), White (26)
There's only 4 guys in there that are over 26: Cassisi (31), Cornes (30), Schulz (28) and Westhoff (27). Cassisi only played 12 games this year and the others shouldn't slow down in 2014. Odds are that a fair chunk of their young guys will continue to develop and improve this year with very few players declining no losses due to retirement.
They were the youngest (non-expansion) team in the AFL this year, yet still managed to win 13 games despite giving away a significant age and experience advantage nearly every week. Here's the average age of each club in 2013 (the age of the actual sides that lined up each week, not the irrelevant list age):
Sydney: 26.24
Hawthorn: 25.97
Geelong: 25.86
St Kilda: 25.54
Carlton: 25.33
Fremantle: 25.20
West Coast: 25.19
Collingwood: 25.17
Richmond: 24.96
Essendon: 24.82
North Melb: 24.78
Bulldogs: 24.61
Brisbane: 24.55
Adelaide: 24.40
Melbourne: 24.04
Port Adelaide: 23.75
Gold Coast: 22.98
GWS: 21.60
So as you can see the age ladder roughly correlates to the actual ladder, with a couple of big outliers. Last year it was Richmond in a similar position. They were the youngest (non-expansion) club with an average of 23.89 and won 10.5 games, and they surged up the ladder the following year.
So will Port really be the slider? With guys like Wines (19), Wingard (20), Hartlett (23) and Ebert (23) all a year closer to their prime, and nobody of any value leaving the club, it's hard to see them sliding even with a slighly harder draw. The one thing that you could count against them is that they had a pretty good run with injuries. Dom Cassisi only managed 12 games and Jarrad Redden went down for the season, but other than that their list was pretty healthy for most of the year and quite a few players played 22-24 games. Even Robbie Gray managed 20 games.
So what does everyone think? To me their scope for improvement over the next year or two is enormous.