Vintage Bay Worst 200 game player

Remove this Banner Ad

Check out innocent looking Anthony Rocca after he tore Robert Murphy's leg off after Murphy jested he might end up the worst 200 game player in afl/vfl history.

r87919_259904.jpg


I think this is a reminder for us all to remember how all collywobble supporters chuck tantrums after certain players get named the worst 200 game player in afl/vfl history.


On the plus side, it was the first target he'd hit all day.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

ROCCA!!!!!!

This the the funniest thread I've come across on here. As much about the poster as the thread itself. Vinnie, this is karma, you've made my week. Keep it up son, you're living up to expectations just like your team. Hahahahahaha.

Spelling Bee:.....

JTG: "Vinnie, how do you spell 'Rocca' ?"

Vinnie: "I know, I know, it's um.......I know....R-O-C-K"

Vinnie: " By the way I have a trip coming up"

JTG: "Where you going Vinnie"

Vinnie: "I'm going to Ayres R-O-C-C-A."
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I've discussed this with numerous people before and in my opinion it would have to be Jarred Crouch (Tivendale can't make the grade with 188 or Nick Davis with 164). Anthony Rock would rank pretty closely behind. Who else do people think of in recent years?


No such thing as worst 200 game player. sort of contradicts itself!

But let's go one better.

Take another direction.
Which player that has played 300 games is the worst of that group!

I'll nominate Scott West of the Bulldogs!
320 games, averaged about 30 harmless possessions per week & only kicked 100 or so goals.
Never really was a devestating midfielder for someone that got plenty of the ball.
Yep..........West!
Hard to fathom he's played that many games!
 
No such thing as worst 200 game player. sort of contradicts itself!

But let's go one better.

Take another direction.
Which player that has played 300 games is the worst of that group!

Anthony Rocca is yet to play 300 games. Your post is null and void.
 
There is no such thing as "the worst 200 game player".

If you stick around long enough to play 200 games, its a great effort. Those people you mentioned have done things for their clubs at times, that you don't know what their coach has asked of them. Crouch might not have been the most talented, but him and Aker had some great battles, which I'd give the honours to him. Davis got Sydney into a GF and has excited crowds with his freakishness at times. I find it a bit stupid that you would call anyone who has played 200 games, to try and find the worst player out of it.

sounds like someones only ever won a best at training trophy to me:thumbsu:
 
No such thing as worst 200 game player. sort of contradicts itself!

But let's go one better.

Take another direction.
Which player that has played 300 games is the worst of that group!

I'll nominate Scott West of the Bulldogs!
320 games, averaged about 30 harmless possessions per week & only kicked 100 or so goals.
Never really was a devestating midfielder for someone that got plenty of the ball.
Yep..........West!
Hard to fathom he's played that many games!

Yeah but apparently he won 7 best and fairests pretty hopeless.

Now on to 200 games what does everyone else think i'm a little confused
 
This the the funniest thread I've come across on here. As much about the poster as the thread itself. Vinnie, this is karma, you've made my week. Keep it up son, you're living up to expectations just like your team. Hahahahahaha.

l totally agree. thanks so much coondogs, l hav'nt laughed so much in ages..............cacking myself, well done. by the way vinnie if you have time, our school children can never get enough help with there reading!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Vintage Bay Worst 200 game player

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top