
- Sep 7, 2014
- 1,025
- 2,615
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Vancouver Canucks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True, but the listing itself doesn't disclose anything specific, other than a certain person has a court listing at a certain day and time for a criminal matter.
If any suppression order is in place it will remain in place until at least the first court appearance.
True, but the listing itself doesn't disclose anything specific, other than a certain person has a court listing at a certain day and time for a criminal matter.The info is there for attendees to be able to search when their court dates are. Looks like someone figured out they can search his name in the correct court, and that information would pop up. I don't know if that was suppressed earlier, but it's absolutely there now - and literally anyone with half a brain can go from the Geelong Magistrates page and do it themselves.
Social media and forums will run with this very shortly, and then it's game over. This website has at least 10,000 people on a given day...there'd already be hundreds that would have this info and be sharing it. Regardless of if it's an error or not, once something is out on the internet - it's out. There's no deniability anymore.
I imagine if it enters the mainstream, as I'm suspecting it will overnight, that Twitter/X will grab a hold of it - and all journos will know. Then it will be a case of 'do you have anything to say regarding the rumours circulating on social media regarding one of your players.'
Even if the order somehow remains, the information will be everywhere by tomorrow/late tonight. They'll need to give some sort of response, even if not directly naming the player in question.
True, but the listing itself doesn't disclose anything specific, other than a certain person has a court listing at a certain day and time for a criminal matter.
If any suppression order is in place it will remain in place until at least the first court appearance.
It's already all over X, I came here after seeing the same screen shot on X and checking EFAS myself.
Geelong X account has been inundated with the same screenshot on their post abut re-signings.At first they hid the replies (still viewable if you press "show hidden replies" but then they turned off comments on the post.
100% now its a shitshow especially for the victim which is unfair to them. If it is who we suspect then I just can't see how we can justify him playing when he's not injured. I know Richmond let Pickett play but I would be incredibly disappointed if he plays.Completely unsurprised. It's too big a story to contain. Things on the internet these days spread in a matter of minutes, not days anymore.
The club and the AFL would be in crisis talks right now. I daresay the courts will be contacted first thing in the morning, and the suppression order will likely be lifted given they've already unwittingly leaked it themselves.
Like I said before, these are uncharted waters, and I legitimately have no idea how this will be responded to or how the AFL/Geelong/the courts will respond. What I do know though, is what just happened will spread everywhere, and it will be the biggest story in the country come tomorrow morning. This is a serious violation of both the victim and the accused's rights, and could seriously harm the outcome of the court case. Complete and utter amateur hour, and a disgusting outcome for all parties involved.
Just so you know, the "informant" named in the listing isn't an alleged victim, it's the name of the charging police officer.100% now its a shitshow especially for the victim which is unfair to them. If it is who we suspect then I just can't see how we can justify him playing when he's not injured. I know Richmond let Pickett play but I would be incredibly disappointed if he plays.
I understand that I mean more in general. Imagine if people found out you accused a local AFL player the amount of hate you would get. Not a stretch that gets leaked now.Just so you know, the "informant" named in the listing isn't an alleged victim, it's the name of the charging police officer.
I thought the Geelong ITK said that it was a player from a Melbourne based club?
Perhaps a different Tanner Bruhn is listed to appear in court.
In all seriousness though- this is a blight on the league, no reason for point scoring here.
100% now its a shitshow especially for the victim which is unfair to them. If it is who we suspect then I just can't see how we can justify him playing when he's not injured. I know Richmond let Pickett play but I would be incredibly disappointed if he plays.
Excellent.Why should I give a shit about you, when you're the one throwing out little internet gotchas, with no concern at all for the affected parties - all the while laughing away at posts from behind your screen little a little internet loser in mummy's basement. Guarantee you wouldn't be laughing and pathetically internet trolling if the affected party was your sister, wife, friend or daughter.
Go take a long hard look at yourself in the mirror mate. You're a disgrace, and you're a child. Ignored.
I understand that Richmond believed Pickett's side of the story and the fact that the WA police keep adjourning the case means they haven't got enough evidence to convict him. That's a very different situation to this. This will be going to court.100% now its a shitshow especially for the victim which is unfair to them. If it is who we suspect then I just can't see how we can justify him playing when he's not injured. I know Richmond let Pickett play but I would be incredibly disappointed if he plays.
I am absolutely stunned the media has been has not said anything, suppression orders do get broken a lot more than people want to realize, as these stories are usually huge with reporters want to be the first to break it, in fact I would say this is one of the biggest stories ever in the AFL.
I actually feel sorry for Geelong supporters, no one want something like this happen at their club they support.
I understand that Richmond believed Pickett's side of the story and the fact that the WA police keep adjourning the case means they haven't got enough evidence to convict him. That's a very different situation to this. This will be going to court.
Having said that, he deserves the presumption of innocence until he is proven guilty.
It's still online for me.It's not for me.
100% agree mateI appreciate the sentiment mate, but a lot of your own brethren are absolutely salivating at this as a point scoring exercise to say 'Geelong bad, Richmond good'...rather than caring one iota about the victim involved. Also not focusing on the fact that Geelong as a club has nothing to do with the player's actions outside the club. North weren't responsible for Thomas' actions. Sydney weren't responsbile for Taylor's actions, and Geelong isn't responsible for said player in this thread's, actions.
Nothing is sacred anymore - all just tribal. You only need to see all the laugh reacts to anything a Geelong supporter says that's serious. Doesn't really matter honestly, but it's disappointing that people try to point score on a sexual assault case, because they wear different stripes on the weekend.
I guess that's what politics is now, so why should footy be any different. It's just Trump's trolling world now, and we're all living in it.
What can the club realistically say?I imagine if it enters the mainstream, as I'm suspecting it will overnight, that Twitter/X will grab a hold of it - and all journos will know. Then it will be a case of 'do you have anything to say regarding the rumours circulating on social media regarding one of your players.'
Even if the order somehow remains, the information will be everywhere by tomorrow/late tonight. They'll need to give some sort of response, even if not directly naming the player in question.
It's on a publicly available website. Nothing wrong with posting a screenshot.Hey maybe the screenshot of the magistrates court appearance should be removed, nobody wants to risk getting in legal trouble about this because you want to dunk on another team.
Just watch what you say about this whole thing there's likely a suppression order in plplace.
I would normally agree (3 strikes is covered up all the time) but seriously, what is Geelong supposed to do here when it's a legal issue? They are between a rock and hard place. If it was public from the beginning they would have wiped their hands of itThe fake finger injury Geelong have made up for him is absolutely pathetic. This is why people question the injury lists and players sitting out with mental health issues. Everyone knows the clubs consistently lie about these things
Don’t feel bad for us. I don’t feel bad for fellow supportersI am absolutely stunned the media has not said anything, suppression orders do get broken a lot more than people want to realize, as these stories are usually huge with reporters want to be the first to break it, in fact I would say this is one of the biggest stories ever in the AFL.
I actually feel sorry for Geelong supporters, no one want something like this happen at their club they support.
100% agree mate
It’s pretty pathetic really
Even to people tempting a possible suppression order,
We can all connect the dots but as for posting anything publicly it’s not worth posting something on any platform that could be grounds to be used to push for a mistrial
The victim and even the perpetrator deserve for this to be played out properly and it’s not the type of issue anyone should be trying to use for some bullshit footy “banter”