
Kanga Glory
Premium Platinum








Maybe the players could do this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then they'll start giving players 50s for laughing.I reckon you just laugh at them
Exactly!If the rule is strictly no dissent, then nothing wrong with asking what the decision was for. Or expressing frustration. As long as you don't express a different opinion it's not dissent.
Should be able to train players how to question, query, berate themselves but not dissent.
But.. umps need to own up and be accountable when they make a clear mistake.
And Luke would be stuffed with his resting giggle face.Then they'll start giving players 50s for laughing.
Which would be funny as fu**.
A hypocrite. Nothing more.How ironic that one of the most demonstrative players, making rules about dissent. How the tables have turned!
How ironic that one of the most demonstrative players, is now making rules about dissent. How the tables have turned!
You think we hate BS now……you think he’s not gunna be involved in the PP decision? If we are in need of a PP, portion of blame sits pretty squarely on his shoulders, he won’t cop that.
Superstitious SDS?Stop saying PP.
Nah, just that Im hearing pee pee.Superstitious SDS?
makey makes a lot more sence than scotts. i umpired jumior footy for 3 seasons and was never once intinidated by players waving their arms. some of their parents is another story.
he has become a parody of himself.Actually can’t stand the clown
Of all the people at HQ, he'd be about the only one who would give us a fair hearing over a PP.You think we hate BS now……you think he’s not gunna be involved in the PP decision? If we are in need of a PP, portion of blame sits pretty squarely on his shoulders, he won’t cop that.
Just like he graciously chose the “walk away from North when he wasn't the right man anymore” move, provided he got paid for the following year.
Actually can’t stand the clown
Geez I have quite the opposite view. It’d be like him admitting he got things wrong.Of all the people at HQ, he'd be about the only one who would give us a fair hearing over a PP.
They’ve created a solution to a problem that never existed.Scott has done more to increase vitriol towards umps than anything else. Does he think fans arent going to react to umps calling 50 for having players hold their arms out?
I get there's a shortage of umps. But he never explained the link between AFL players arguing with umps and these shortages.
I get the paying 50 for obvious abuse.
But adult relationships aren't built on this 'hold out your arms and its 50' stuff.
I remember a story where Carey was giving it to an ump. The ump turns around and tells him to shut the fu** up and get a kick. Love it.