Discussion 2023 General AFL Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Perhaps an AFLPA representative should be around for questioning in all tribunal cases.

This where I was headed with how to fix some of it.

AFL is determined to say this is not legal and it's a game, meanwhile, they have lawyers arguing said game using legal means as lawyers. At the crux of it, players are the ones that are impacted by rule changes and generally the ones that know if someone meant malice or to actually hurt instead of it being a football action that is easily misconstrued in slow mo camera. There then exists a body where players can be a sounding board for action, that being as you posit, the AFLPA.

Rather than having random board of ex players media and what not deliberating, have reps of the AFLPA for just how damaged or potential to be, their member is, whilst the clubs then indicate to them, how great they are for said player they are advocating for.
 
If Butler being the only one with momentum is a problem, does that mean that you can't tackle stationary players lol?

What a *ing joke the AFL have become.

AFL players will need to get a Physics degree to work out if the amount of momentum they impart on a player being tackled is within acceptable limits.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

whew, chasedown tackles are one of the more electrifying moments of our game, would have been a travesty

was trying to find video of Butlers almost identical tackle earlier in the season in the middle of the ground and Phillipou picked it up and played on firing it into the forward line and we scored a goal. Was at a massive moment in the game as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top