sr36
TheBrownDog
You'd have to think Bevo is in trouble.And people complained about our loss lol
There really is no excuse for the Doggies not to be better?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You'd have to think Bevo is in trouble.And people complained about our loss lol
There really is no excuse for the Doggies not to be better?
Ain’t no way north will try and win next week. Why would you. One win to avoid a spoon or get the best player who could win flags for you.
Now without Newcombe playing today can’t see itCarlton 4th would be a dream result for us but don't think it will happen.
Does Bont poll a vote?
always isHudson's commentary is a bit over the top isn't it?
He will poll 1 or 2Does Bont poll a vote?
Doggies board would suggest thisYou'd have to think Bevo is in trouble.
Let’s change all the rules. If a ball is touched before it goes through the goals, do what. It’s a goal.A rule that says a ball grazing a post is a behind does nothing to make the game great. Though I agree with you in that it separates our sport from others in that it makes a billion dollar industry look amateurish, confusing to casual observers and sometimes devastating to a club's results. The rule change doesn't cover for incompetence, it removes ambiguity. There's no guarantee that throwing money at it going to fix the issue anyway as the updated cameras and snicko may still miss it
It's like the umpire bouncing the ball issue, where the purists both complained about the uniqueness of the game being ruined and also about bad bounces favouring the opposition. They changed the bounce rule and I would hazard a guess that not one person, turned away from the game as a result.
Only in this case, your recommendation would be that we put laser guided gyroscopes in the balls to compensate for the bad umpire bounce instead of just doing away with the antiquated mode of getting the ball in the air.
If you change the rule to allow the ball hitting the post but still going over the goal line to be a goal, the problem from last night is solved. No wasted money, no shade thrown at umpires. The game is improved and we all move on.
We never poll in losses. Others poll in our wins though.He will poll 1 or 2
Such a big goal in the context of the game. Surely you get it reviewed to be safe.Which decisions are close is still subjective though, so you have the same problem. This umpire was confident it was a point so didn't call for a review. The game then restarted too quickly for the ARC to get involved.
Sure a mistake was made, just like umpires make many other mistakes, I don't quite get the outrage.
Carlton 4th would be adreamnightmare result for us but don't think it will happen.
Grossly underperformed with the list he has. Never coached the team to a top 4 finish, but has snagged a flag and another GF appearance from the bottom half of the eight.You'd have to think Bevo is in trouble.
Why a nightmare?
SR, we are only talking about boundary line and goal line/goal post decisions here. We have the technology. It can be instantaneous. Why not use it.Let me know when we're at the point that we can review the gamut of AFL umpire decisions without interrupting the game and you'll get my vote. But I'm not a fan of the current silliness where we review whether a kick was touched off the boot when it's a direct goal but not when it results in a mark that leads to a goal.
In this case the tech was irrelevant. It wasn't used. There will be continual efforts to improve it - microchips to be trialled in VFL etc next season. It's not going to be perfect though, so there will always be complaints.But 1080/120 would still be tangibly better than what we have now
No. Want them to finish 5th and get bundled out by 8th, which may well be GWS who they play next week.Carlton 4th would be a dream result for us but don't think it will happen.