And thats where us and Norf differ totally. We gave long contracts to star players to keep a team together to win a flag plus adding Kelly to give us another shot at winning one. We tryed as hard as we could to win premierships. Trying to be successful and being successful put us in this position. Norf gutted their already poor list so they could be putrid. I know which team i would prefer to support. The narrative that we done this to ourselves because we tried to win premierships is close to the dumbest thing i have ever heard from Vic centric media and sh#t there is a never ending list of dumb sh#t to pick from.Simply do not understand the argument that we dont deserve a PP because "we did it to ourselves."
Every single club that ever gets assistance did it to themselves. Its not like a club had half a side taken out in a plane crash.
All clubs that got a PP drafted poorly. And, in regards to keeping or not keeping old players its just a lucky dip to suit a narrative. Sometimes the media use "they offloaded aging champions too early and forced this on themselves" line (this was used for North last year). In our case, they prefer the "we held on to aging champions too long" line. Literally cannot win. In any event, holding on to older players for longer should count for us. Its not like we gutted the list and then went crawling to the AFL after playing with 18 year olds for 2 years.