State of umpiring

[amaz199]

This game is ****ed.

 

[Hojuman]

Was wandering around some old games today, VFL / B & W.

There is no vision of the North v Carlton 1975 qualifying final, so looked up the stats.
There were 96 free kicks in that game ! We gave away 56 !

Imagine that happening nowadays.

 

[DuckYeah]

This is the problem.. they talk about the following contest after a player took a bounce, lost control and was tackled. The holding the ball was missed BEFORE the contest. The rules are not the rules any longer. The holding the ball was in the video produced. Not post that

 

[DuckYeah]

The state of the game and the adjudication is wrong. Its beyond repair. The Adelaide player should have been pinned as he incorrectly disposed of the footy. So be it if he had clean possession and he slips, he didn’t dispose of the footy, he is deemed in possession. THATS THE ****ING RULE. The game is not the game any longer

 

[DuckYeah]

WTF have they done to this game?

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

So glad that the dissent rule has really improved, umm, standards…

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

Hmm…

 

[DarkPhoenix]

About time the club sent a please explain

 

[Horizons_00]

You cheating bunch of corrupt assholes

 

[Disco Dew]

Umpiring is the worst it has ever been. These cints apparently draw a 6 figure salary for it as well…

**** off.

 

[Marstermind]

Totally robbed today. Nick Daicos bringing his own set of rules

 

[tricknologist]

I don't like blaming umpires, but that non-50 call for Scott really needs an explanation. They were happy to give away a soft one because Powell didn't know who the free kick was for, but not when two players burst through the mark and hold up the play?

 

[Roos92]

A deadset disgrace. Yes we shouldn't have let that slip but they had 3 extras on the field and the whole afl world know it. 25vs 22

 

[Only Forwards]

Woeful.

Just f***ing woeful.

 

[Uncle_Leo]

Was 24-14 at the end

We can’t have had more than 5 in the second half, anyone got the numbers on just the second half?

 

[Mute Point]

Umpires are cooked. The one where Sheez tackled Jiath for HTB. Collingwood players ran away with the ball & Ump called play the advantage to them.
I rest my case.

 

[Marstermind]

What was the 50 to Daicos in the 3rd about? Seemed the ball was thrown straight back to him.

 

[Samsquanch]

Hmm…

Two on the mark might be something that you might expect an umpire to notice as well, but I might be nit picking.

 

[Wayne Campbell]

I don't like blaming umpires, but that non-50 call for Scott really needs an explanation. They were happy to give away a soft one because Powell didn't know who the free kick was for, but not when two players burst through the mark and hold up the play?

I’d be asking a few questions after today, just not good enough


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[rippersnipper]

Did they explain what the deal was with that crisp goal that was clearly touched? It's like it wasn't reviewed

 

[Disco Dew]

What was the 50 to Daicos in the 3rd about? Seemed the ball was thrown straight back to him.

Not quick enough, despite the fact Powell was actually turning around to give it to daicos.
The lesson is, never pick the ball up.

Shit call though

 

[Shermanator]

they absolutely shit themselves when the Collingwood supporters get rowdy.

That Daicos throw right in front of goal and the non 50 to Scott (both in the clutch) were sickening.

 

[Samsquanch]

Did they explain what the deal was with that crisp goal that was clearly touched? It's like it wasn't reviewed

I was about to ask about that as well.

 

[Samsquanch]

Clearly the umpires are setting North up for pick one.

 

[Marstermind]

Not quick enough, despite the fact Powell was actually turning around to give it to daicos.
The lesson is, never pick the ball up.

Shit call though

Riiiight

 

[scottywiper]

So 50 to Daicos for **** all. And not 50 to Scott with two guys over mark by 5m. WWE