Toast Hawthorn have headf***ed everyone

Remove this Banner Ad

So conversely the interstate team enjoy at the very least a 3-4 goal advantage every second week.
Absolutely they do and I think it’s why you sometimes see interstate sides get a run on into finals when they’re a bit off the pace. I remember the media taking up Freo as the second coming back in 2013. Comparing that side now on paper to the hawks, they’re barely fit to tie our teams boot laces.
 
I remember the media taking up Freo as the second coming back in 2013.

That was one of the more bizarre media narratives I have seen. I think it was primarily fuelled by hope that they would beat us more than any rational commentary.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

That is balanced out by the home ground advantage that interstate clubs have during season.
There are 153 possible pairing of GF opponents in an 18 team competition.
Of those with 8 interstate teams there are 28 possible pairings that are solely interstate teams.
With 10 Victorian teams there are 45 possible combinations of only victorian teams contesting in the GF.
This leaves 80 combinations where there is 1 Victoria team and 1 interstate team.

Hence the chances of randomly generating two opponents in the grand final are

Interstate/Interstate 18.3%
Victorian/Interstate 52.3%
Victorian/Victorian 29.4%

The chances of an interstate team making the grand final purely by chance is 70.6%

Since the 18 team competition, 80% of grand finals have been contested by Victorian/Interstate combination, 20% by Victorian/Victorian and 0% by an all-interstate affair.
 
Threads gone way off topic

Moderators in off-season:

mad mark wahlberg GIF
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

every discussion starting with "THESE ARE JUST ALLEGATIONS".

"THERE ARE TWO SIDES TO EVERY STORY"

"ITS JUST A SHAKEDOWN"
The tone of reporting is very different.
When it was the hawks, the hawks and everyone associated were tarred and feathered before anyone even knew anything, meanwhile there's been barely a mention of the pies.

Could also be time of year impacting it though
 
The tone of reporting is very different.
When it was the hawks, the hawks and everyone associated were tarred and feathered before anyone even knew anything, meanwhile there's been barely a mention of the pies.

Could also be time of year impacting it though

It’s Pendel’s 400th game. They can come back to this story when the next bit of paperwork hits the courts.
 
The tone of reporting is very different.
When it was the hawks, the hawks and everyone associated were tarred and feathered before anyone even knew anything, meanwhile there's been barely a mention of the pies.

Could also be time of year impacting it though
There's some key differences.

The Hawthorn stuff was multiple former footballers accusing multiple former senior football staff from one of the clubs most successful and notable eras of terrible things (eg. trying to split partners, encouraging abortions, etc.). Names like Rioli, Clarkson and Fagan also make it of high interest.

The Collingwood stuff is just one former administration staff member accusing the CEO of inappropriate comments and jokes. It's newsworthy and has been discussed this week across TV, radio and articles, but there's not much else to talk about until it proceeds further in court.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Toast Hawthorn have headf***ed everyone

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top