Malibu#27
Premium Platinum
Latest news:
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
yeah i think i confused myself we need to get something more back for Luko not an F1 straight swap.. In isolation i don't think 13, F2 and Richards for Richards is as bad as everyone is saying.Horrendous
Let's say you're giving up an F1 for Luko (which most on this forum don't want to do anyway)...
That means pick 13, F2 and Joe Schmoe = Dan Houston
If that was the case why not just give the F1 for Luko and keep Houston
No deal. That’s probs almost saying straight swap Houston for Pick 13, and still bad for usIs say pick 13, F2, Luko and Joe Richards for Houston and a F1 really that bad?
This is the way to look at it. Put this way, it is absolutely awful.Yes.
One first rounder in, one first rounder out, so they cancel each other out. That leaves it as trading a contracted dual AA for a second round pick and two fringe players. It is awful.
pick 23 and luko from GC for the F1 i meant to put in.Yes.
One first rounder in, one first rounder out, so they cancel each other out. That leaves it as trading a contracted dual AA for a second round pick and two fringe players. It is awful.
Still bad. Just keep the F1 and Gold Coast can have 23. If that doesn't get it done, keep Houston.pick 23 and luko from GC for the F1 i meant to put in.
how do you get luko then?Still bad. Just keep the F1 and Gold Coast can have 23. If that doesn't get it done, keep Houston.
I reckon we’d still be looking at upgrading our 2nd for Luko, using Soldo, our future 2nd and perhaps another playeryeah i think i confused myself we need to get something more back for Luko not an F1 straight swap.. In isolation i don't think 13, F2 and Richards for Richards is as bad as everyone is saying.
And F1 for Luko plus a second rounder back, is it pick 23?
If the cost is a first round pick I'd rather not get him.how do you get luko then?
I hope we wouldn’t do that either.The only half decent outcome for us in a 3-way trade would be
Port Get: 13, Lukosius, Richards
Give: Houston
GC Get: Collingwood F1, 29
Give: Lukosius, 13
Collingwood Get: Houston
Give: Richards, F1, 29
Doubt Gold Coast are doing that though
Richmond are getting two first rounders for a worse player than Houston but sure, we're 'setting ourselves up for disappointment' by wanting ****ing one.i think a lot of you are setting yourselves up for disappointment.
I think if we can turn Houston, Soldo and a F1 into pick 13, 3 second rounders, Luko and Richards it's not that a bad result.
I'd love to hold Houston to his contract though but i would still do a deal with GC giving them our f1 for Luko and pick 23.
I agree that this is what we’ll probably settle for but it’s not that inspiring especially when we lose a F1R that may end up being an earlier pick than 13 if we finish outside the top 6 in 2025.i think a lot of you are setting yourselves up for disappointment.
I think if we can turn Houston, Soldo and a F1 into pick 13, 3 second rounders, Luko and Richards it's not that a bad result.
I'd love to hold Houston to his contract though but i would still do a deal with GC giving them our f1 for Luko and pick 23.
I ****ing hate this club. We throw away future first rounders like candy and then desperately try to trade our way back in for a premium price the year after. It's a joke.Twomey (if I heard right) did suggest we end up with 13, 23, 29, Lukosius and Richards for Houston and F1.
They can make the deal as complicated as they want but we're still losing out. We lost the moment Lukosius nominated us bc we were always going to be manipulated into including him in a Houston trade.Twomey (if I heard right) did suggest we end up with 13, 23, 29, Lukosius and Richards for Houston and F1.
'Including him in the Houston trade' should have at worst meant that we take Luko and a single first rounder for Houston instead of taking two first rounders. That was the barely passable result.They can make the deal as complicated as they want but we're still losing out. We lost the moment Lukosius nominated us bc we were always going to be manipulated into including him in a Houston trade.
I had a theory that had Port keeping their F1 but Port fans didn't like it.If the cost is a first round pick I'd rather not get him.
If we can't work out a deal where we're getting 13 + Luko + Richards and not a penny less for Houston, keep Houston. We absolutely should not be giving up Houston AND our F1 to get that haul. Adding in more second rounders doesn't move the needle.
Sounds okTwomey (if I heard right) did suggest we end up with 13, 23, 29, Lukosius and Richards for Houston and F1.
What are you thinking of the trade period though?